Abstract
This paper examines civic mobilization for school improvement in Rivergrove, a small suburban city within the inner rings of a large Florida metro (All names of individuals, schools, organizations and communities are pseudonyms per IRB agreement with district. Subsequently, references to local media reports and city documents are disguised to meet IRB requirements.). Here, civic mobilization is understood as a movement against technocratic control over decision-making in a struggle over the social construction of place (Lake 1994). Faced with limited growth and demographic change, Rivergrove’s civic leaders embrace strategies utilized in major cities to address blight and increasing school segregation. Rivergrove’s elected and appointed leaders sought independence from the larger metropolitan school district in order to confine school boundaries to Rivergrove’s city limits, at the exclusion of low income, predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Although local control proved infeasible, civic mobilization increased inter-governmental cooperation between city leaders and metropolitan school district officials. Efforts to improve public schooling focus on building a community identity within the schools, establishing themed academic programs in schools undergoing social economic and racial turnover, providing grants for instructional innovation, and forming regular communication between elected officials and district and school level leaders. The case of Rivergrove offers insight into the racial and class boundary making that occurs when building civic capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This project was directed by the Civil Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles with support from the Spencer Foundation.
References
Brantlinger, E. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Brennan, C., Hackler, D., & Hoene, C. (2005). Demographic change in small cities, 1990 to 2000. Urban Affairs Review, 40(3), 342–361.
Briffault, R. (2010). The most popular tool: Tax increment financing and the political economy of local government. The University of Chicago Law Review, 77(1), 65–95.
Cucchiara, M. (2008). Re-branding urban schools: Urban revitalization, social status, and the marketing public schools in the upper middle class. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 165–179.
Finnigan, K. S., & Lavner, M. (2012). A political analysis of community influence over school closure. The Urban Review, 44(1), 133–151.
Frankenberg, E. (2013). The role of residential segregation in contemporary school segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45(5), 548–570.
Frankenberg, E., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (2012). The resegregation of suburban schools: A hidden crisis in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
Gillborn, D. (2014). Racism as policy: A critical race analysis of education reforms in the United States and England. The Educational Forum, 78(1), 26–41.
Hackworth, J. (2002). Local autonomy, bond–rating agencies and neoliberal urbanism in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4), 707–725.
Henig, J., & Rich, W. (Eds.). (2004). Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hill, P., Campbell, C., & Harvey, J. (2000). It takes a city: Getting serious about urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Keating, W. (2010). The suburban racial dilemma: Housing and neighborhoods. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lake, R. W. (1994). Negotiating local autonomy. Political Geography, 13(5), 423–442.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge.
Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
Lucy, W., & Phillips, D. (2000). Suburban decline: The next urban crisis. Issues in Science and Technology, 17(1), 55–62.
McDermott, K., DeBray, E., & Frankenberg, E. (2012). How does Parents Involved in Community Schools matter? Legal and political influence in education politics and policy. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1–39.
Nader, L. (1972). Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing anthropology (pp. 281–311). New York: Vintage Books.
Payne, C. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. New York: Harvard Educational Press.
Shipps, D. (2004). Chicago: The national “model” reexamined. In J. Henig & W. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools (pp. 59–95). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shipps, D. (2008). Urban regime theory and reform of public schools: Governance, power and leadership. In B. Copper, J. Cibulka, & L. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 89–108). New York: Routledge.
Shirley, D. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas.
Short, J. R., Hanlon, B., & Vicino, T. J. (2007). The decline of inner suburbs: The new suburban gothic in the United States. Geography Compass, 1(3), 641–656.
Siskind, P. (2006). Suburban growth and discontents. In K. Kruse & T. Sugrue (Eds.), The new suburban history. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Smith, J. J., & Stovall, D. (2008). ‘Coming home’ to new homes and new schools: Critical race theory and the new politics of containment. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 135–152.
Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, C. (1998). Changing urban education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, C., Henig, J., Jones, B., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Swanstrom, T., Winter, W., Sherraden, M., & Lake, J. (2013). Civic capacity and school/community partnerships in a fragmented suburban setting: The case of 24: 1. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(1), 25–42.
Tilly, C. (2003). Changing forms of inequality. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 31–36.
Walford, G. (Ed.). (1994). Researching the powerful in education. London: UCL Press.
Warren, M. R. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133–173.
Weber, R. (2003). Equity and entrepreneurialism the impact of tax increment financing on school finance. Urban Affairs Review, 38(5), 619–644.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shircliffe, B.J., Lance Rowland, M. Civic Mobilization for School Reform in Rivergrove, Florida: Contesting the “Social Construction of Place” in an Inner Ring Suburban City. Urban Rev 47, 413–432 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0324-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0324-y