Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the internal inguinal ring need closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy with Prentiss manoeuvre?

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Undescended testis is a common problem, which is prevalent in 3 % of male infants. This study aimed to determine the effect of leaving the deep inguinal ring (DIR) without closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy (LO), with regard to post-operative hernia formation and other outcomes.

Methods

From 2012 to 2014, 63 testicular units were managed with laparoscopy for non-palpable testis (NPT). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed for all NPTs, and when they were intra-abdominal (42 testicular units), the DIR was left open after mobilization of the testis into the scrotum medial to the inferior epigastric vessels (Prentiss manoeuvre). We followed up these cases to check for hernia formation.

Results

The ages ranged from 10 months to 11 years with mean age at 3.7 years. Clinically, no cases presented with hernia, hydrocele or any other complications during a mean follow-up period of 34.4 months.

Conclusion

Closing the peritoneum over the DIR might be omitted in LO with Prentiss manoeuvre, saving operative time and effort. By doing so, there is no risk of hernia formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sijstermans K, Hack WW, Meijer RW, van der Voort-Doedens LM (2008) The frequency of undescended testis from birth to adulthood: a review. Int J Androl 32:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esposito C, Garipoli V (1997) The value of 2-step laparoscopic Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy for intraabdominal testes. J Urol 158:1952–1954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Samadi AA, Palmer LS, Franco I (2003) Laparoscopic orchiopexy: report of 203 cases with review of diagnosis, operative technique, and lessons learned. J Endourol 17(6):365–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro F (1998) The non-palpable testis. In: Bax NMA, Georgeson KE, Najmaldin AS, Valla JS (eds) Endoscopic surgery in children. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–407

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bogaert GA, Kogan BA, Mevorach RA (1993) Therapeutic laparoscopy for intra-abdominal testes. Urology 42:182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang B, Palmer LS, Franco I (2001) Laparoscopic orchidopexy: a review of a large clinical series. BJU Int 87:490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prentiss RJ, Weickgenant CJ, Moses JJ et al (1960) Undescended testis: surgical anatomy of spermatic vessels, spermatic surgical triangles and lateral spermatic ligament. J Urol 83:686–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Gohary MA (1997) The role of laparoscopy in the management of impalpable testes. Pediatr Surg Int 12(5–6):463–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphrey GM, Najmaldin AS, Thomas DF (1998) Laparoscopy in the management of the impalpable undescended testis. Br J Surg 85:983–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss RM, Carter AR, Rosenfield AT (1986) High resolution real-time ultrasonography in the localization of the undescended testis. J Urol 135:936–938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handa R, Kale R, Harjai MM (2005) Laparoscopic orchiopexy: is closure of the internal ring necessary? J Postgrad Med 51:266–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khairi A, Shehata S, El-Kholi N (2013) Is it necessary to close the peritoneum over the deep inguinal ring during laparoscopic orchidopexy? J Pediatr Urol 9:157–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain VK, Singh S, Garge S, Joshi M, Sanghvi J (2011) Orchidopexy san ligation technique of orchidopexy. Afr J Paediatr Surg 8:112–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohta A, Jain N, Irniraya KP et al (2003) Non-ligation of hernial sac during herniotomy: a prospective study. Pediatr Surg Int 19:451–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Banieghbal B (2005) Laparoscopic orchidopexy: expert’s comment. J Postgrad Med 51:268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarath Kumar Narayanan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained as applicable from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narayanan, S.K., Puthenvariath, J.N., Somnath, P. et al. Does the internal inguinal ring need closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy with Prentiss manoeuvre?. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 13–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1438-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1438-1

Keywords

Navigation