Abstract
Background
Undescended testis is a common problem, which is prevalent in 3 % of male infants. This study aimed to determine the effect of leaving the deep inguinal ring (DIR) without closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy (LO), with regard to post-operative hernia formation and other outcomes.
Methods
From 2012 to 2014, 63 testicular units were managed with laparoscopy for non-palpable testis (NPT). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed for all NPTs, and when they were intra-abdominal (42 testicular units), the DIR was left open after mobilization of the testis into the scrotum medial to the inferior epigastric vessels (Prentiss manoeuvre). We followed up these cases to check for hernia formation.
Results
The ages ranged from 10 months to 11 years with mean age at 3.7 years. Clinically, no cases presented with hernia, hydrocele or any other complications during a mean follow-up period of 34.4 months.
Conclusion
Closing the peritoneum over the DIR might be omitted in LO with Prentiss manoeuvre, saving operative time and effort. By doing so, there is no risk of hernia formation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sijstermans K, Hack WW, Meijer RW, van der Voort-Doedens LM (2008) The frequency of undescended testis from birth to adulthood: a review. Int J Androl 32:1–11
Esposito C, Garipoli V (1997) The value of 2-step laparoscopic Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy for intraabdominal testes. J Urol 158:1952–1954
Samadi AA, Palmer LS, Franco I (2003) Laparoscopic orchiopexy: report of 203 cases with review of diagnosis, operative technique, and lessons learned. J Endourol 17(6):365–368
Ferro F (1998) The non-palpable testis. In: Bax NMA, Georgeson KE, Najmaldin AS, Valla JS (eds) Endoscopic surgery in children. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–407
Bogaert GA, Kogan BA, Mevorach RA (1993) Therapeutic laparoscopy for intra-abdominal testes. Urology 42:182
Chang B, Palmer LS, Franco I (2001) Laparoscopic orchidopexy: a review of a large clinical series. BJU Int 87:490
Prentiss RJ, Weickgenant CJ, Moses JJ et al (1960) Undescended testis: surgical anatomy of spermatic vessels, spermatic surgical triangles and lateral spermatic ligament. J Urol 83:686–692
El-Gohary MA (1997) The role of laparoscopy in the management of impalpable testes. Pediatr Surg Int 12(5–6):463–465
Humphrey GM, Najmaldin AS, Thomas DF (1998) Laparoscopy in the management of the impalpable undescended testis. Br J Surg 85:983–985
Weiss RM, Carter AR, Rosenfield AT (1986) High resolution real-time ultrasonography in the localization of the undescended testis. J Urol 135:936–938
Handa R, Kale R, Harjai MM (2005) Laparoscopic orchiopexy: is closure of the internal ring necessary? J Postgrad Med 51:266–268
Khairi A, Shehata S, El-Kholi N (2013) Is it necessary to close the peritoneum over the deep inguinal ring during laparoscopic orchidopexy? J Pediatr Urol 9:157–160
Jain VK, Singh S, Garge S, Joshi M, Sanghvi J (2011) Orchidopexy san ligation technique of orchidopexy. Afr J Paediatr Surg 8:112–114
Mohta A, Jain N, Irniraya KP et al (2003) Non-ligation of hernial sac during herniotomy: a prospective study. Pediatr Surg Int 19:451–452
Banieghbal B (2005) Laparoscopic orchidopexy: expert’s comment. J Postgrad Med 51:268
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained as applicable from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narayanan, S.K., Puthenvariath, J.N., Somnath, P. et al. Does the internal inguinal ring need closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy with Prentiss manoeuvre?. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 13–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1438-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1438-1