Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of modified penoplasty for concealed penis in children

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of modified penoplasty in the management of concealed penis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 96 consecutive patients with concealed penis, which had been surgically corrected between July 2013 and July 2015. All patients underwent modified Shiraki phalloplasty. All patients were scheduled for regular follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. Data on the patients’ age, operative time, postoperative complications, and parents’ satisfaction grade were collected and analyzed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 17.4 months (range 7–31 months). The mean operative time was 63.2 ± 8.7 min. The mean perpendicular penile length was 1.89 ± 0.77 cm preoperatively and 4.42 ± 0.87 cm postoperatively, with an improved mean length of 2.5 ± 0.68 cm in the flaccid state postoperatively (p < 0.05). The patients’ satisfaction grades after the surgery were improved significantly (p < 0.05). Fifty-two patients had penile lymphedema postoperatively; however, it disappeared spontaneously within 3 months. Additionally, postoperative wound infection occurred in two patients. There were no complications such as flap necrosis, penile shaft contracture, voiding difficulty, and erection difficulties.

Conclusion

The modified Shiraki phalloplasty for concealed penis can achieve maximum utilization of prepuce to assure coverage of the exposed penile shaft. It has fewer complications, achieving marked asthetics, and functional improvement. It is a relatively ideal means for treating concealed penis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM (1999) A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol 161(2):455–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren AG, Peled ZM, Borud LJ (2009) Surgical correction of a buried penis focusing on the mons as an anatomic unit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(3):388–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng F, Yu WM, Xia Y et al (2010) Effects of buried penis on the structure and function of corpus cavernosum in a rat model. Chin Med J (Engl) 123(13):1736–1740

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sugita Y, Ueoka K, Tagkagi S et al (2009) A new technique of concealed penis repair. J Urol 182(4 Suppl):1751–1754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M et al (2001) Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg 36(3):421–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shiraki IW, Shirai RS (1975) Congenital micropenile skin sleeve. J Urol 114(3):469–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford BS (1977) Buried penis. Br J Plast Surg 30(1):96–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J et al (1986) Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol 136(1 Pt 2):268–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rivas S, Romero R, Parente A et al (2011) Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis. Actas Urol Esp 35(5):310–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jian-Guo Xu, Lv Chuan, Wang Yu-Chong et al (2015) Management of concealed penis with modified penoplasty. Urology 85(3):698–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herndon CD, Casale AJ, Cain MP et al (2003) Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol 170(4 Pt 2):1695–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Redman JF (2005) Buried penis: congenital syndrome of a short penile shaft and a paucity of penile shaft skin. J Urol 173(5):1714–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan AK, Palmer LS, Palmer JS (2011) Inconspicuous penis. Sci World J 11:2559–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valioulis IA, Kallergis IC, Ioannidou DC et al (2015) Correction of concealed penis with preservation of the prepuce. J Pediatr Urol 11(5):259e1–259e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JJ, Lee DG, Park KH et al (2014) A novel technique of concealed penis repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24(2):158–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Guangxi Education Department Promotion Program for Middle-Aged and Young Teacher (KY2016YB102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ti-quan Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Chao Chen and Ning Li have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Li, N., Luo, Yg. et al. Effects of modified penoplasty for concealed penis in children. Int Urol Nephrol 48, 1559–1563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1360-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1360-6

Keywords

Navigation