Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of modified penoplasty in the management of concealed penis.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 96 consecutive patients with concealed penis, which had been surgically corrected between July 2013 and July 2015. All patients underwent modified Shiraki phalloplasty. All patients were scheduled for regular follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. Data on the patients’ age, operative time, postoperative complications, and parents’ satisfaction grade were collected and analyzed.
Results
The mean follow-up period was 17.4 months (range 7–31 months). The mean operative time was 63.2 ± 8.7 min. The mean perpendicular penile length was 1.89 ± 0.77 cm preoperatively and 4.42 ± 0.87 cm postoperatively, with an improved mean length of 2.5 ± 0.68 cm in the flaccid state postoperatively (p < 0.05). The patients’ satisfaction grades after the surgery were improved significantly (p < 0.05). Fifty-two patients had penile lymphedema postoperatively; however, it disappeared spontaneously within 3 months. Additionally, postoperative wound infection occurred in two patients. There were no complications such as flap necrosis, penile shaft contracture, voiding difficulty, and erection difficulties.
Conclusion
The modified Shiraki phalloplasty for concealed penis can achieve maximum utilization of prepuce to assure coverage of the exposed penile shaft. It has fewer complications, achieving marked asthetics, and functional improvement. It is a relatively ideal means for treating concealed penis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM (1999) A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol 161(2):455–459
Warren AG, Peled ZM, Borud LJ (2009) Surgical correction of a buried penis focusing on the mons as an anatomic unit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(3):388–392
Cheng F, Yu WM, Xia Y et al (2010) Effects of buried penis on the structure and function of corpus cavernosum in a rat model. Chin Med J (Engl) 123(13):1736–1740
Sugita Y, Ueoka K, Tagkagi S et al (2009) A new technique of concealed penis repair. J Urol 182(4 Suppl):1751–1754
Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M et al (2001) Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg 36(3):421–425
Shiraki IW, Shirai RS (1975) Congenital micropenile skin sleeve. J Urol 114(3):469–472
Crawford BS (1977) Buried penis. Br J Plast Surg 30(1):96–99
Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J et al (1986) Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol 136(1 Pt 2):268–271
Rivas S, Romero R, Parente A et al (2011) Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis. Actas Urol Esp 35(5):310–314
Jian-Guo Xu, Lv Chuan, Wang Yu-Chong et al (2015) Management of concealed penis with modified penoplasty. Urology 85(3):698–702
Herndon CD, Casale AJ, Cain MP et al (2003) Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol 170(4 Pt 2):1695–1697
Redman JF (2005) Buried penis: congenital syndrome of a short penile shaft and a paucity of penile shaft skin. J Urol 173(5):1714–1717
Srinivasan AK, Palmer LS, Palmer JS (2011) Inconspicuous penis. Sci World J 11:2559–2564
Valioulis IA, Kallergis IC, Ioannidou DC et al (2015) Correction of concealed penis with preservation of the prepuce. J Pediatr Urol 11(5):259e1–259e4
Kim JJ, Lee DG, Park KH et al (2014) A novel technique of concealed penis repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24(2):158–162
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Guangxi Education Department Promotion Program for Middle-Aged and Young Teacher (KY2016YB102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Chao Chen and Ning Li have contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C., Li, N., Luo, Yg. et al. Effects of modified penoplasty for concealed penis in children. Int Urol Nephrol 48, 1559–1563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1360-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1360-6