Skip to main content
Log in

Multifocality in testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT): what is the significance of this finding?

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to determine the association between multifocality and the pathological features of testicular germ cell tumors and its clinical implication.

Methods

Orchiectomy specimens from 254 consecutive patients with testis cancer between 2003 and 2013 were included. Multifocality was defined as a distinct tumor focus of cluster of malignant cells > 0.5 mm and separable from the main tumor mass. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between multifocality and other pathological features. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify potential predictive factors of multifocality for clinical stages II–III and the pathological stage ≥ pT2.

Results

Median patient age was 33 years (range 19–70). Multifocality was identified in 58 (22.83 %) orchiectomy specimens. Subjects with multifocality had larger primary tumor lesions (3.7 vs. 3.0 cm; p < 0.05). No association was found between histology and multifocality (p = 0.95). On univariate logistic regression analysis, multifocality was not significantly associated with all pathological features. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, multifocality was not demonstrated to be an adverse pathological feature of clinical stages II–III (p = 0.23) or pathological stage ≥ pT2 (p = 0.30) when included in a model with tumor size ≥ 4 cm and rete testis invasion in seminoma tumor and neither of clinical stages II–III (p = 0.36) or pathological stage ≥ pT2 (p = 0.20) when included in a model with lymphovascular invasion and percentage of embrional cancer ≥ 50 % in non-seminoma ones.

Conclusion

Multifocality should not be considered an adverse pathological feature in patients with testis cancer, independently to histological subtypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Bray F, Gjerstorff ML, Klint A, Kotlum JE, Olafsdottir E, Pukkala E, Storm HH (2010) NORDCAN—a Nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research. Acta Oncol 49(5):725–736. doi:10.3109/02841861003782017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. La Vecchia C, Bosetti C, Lucchini F, Bertuccio P, Negri E, Boyle P, Levi F (2010) Cancer mortality in Europe, 2000–2004, and an overview of trends since 1975. Ann Oncol 21(6):1323–1360. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249. doi:10.3322/caac.20006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Fizazi K, Horwich A, Laguna MP (2011) EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. Eur Urol 60(2):304–319. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albers P, Siener R, Kliesch S, Weissbach L, Krege S, Sparwasser C, Schulze H, Heidenreich A, de Riese W, Loy V, Bierhoff E, Wittekind C, Fimmers R, Hartmann M (2003) Risk factors for relapse in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1505–1512. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.07.169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bokemeyer C, Kuczyk MA, Serth J, Hartmann JT, Schmoll HJ, Jonas U, Kanz L (1996) Treatment of clinical stage I testicular cancer and a possible role for new biological prognostic parameters. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 122(10):575–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer, 7th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 249–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aparicio J, Germa JR, Garcia del Muro X, Maroto P, Arranz JA, Saenz A, Barnadas A, Dorca J, Guma J, Olmos D, Bastus R, Carles J, Almenar D, Sanchez M, Paz-Ares L, Satrustegui JJ, Mellado B, Balil A, Lopez-Brea M, Sanchez A (2005) Risk-adapted management for patients with clinical stage I seminoma: the Second Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group study. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8717–8723. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Warde P, Specht L, Horwich A, Oliver T, Panzarella T, Gospodarowicz M, von der Maase H (2002) Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 20(22):4448–4452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valdevenito JP, Gallegos I, Fernandez C, Acevedo C, Palma R (2007) Correlation between primary tumor pathologic features and presence of clinical metastasis at diagnosis of testicular seminoma. Urology 70(4):777–780. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrlich Y, Konichezky M, Yossepowitch O, Baniel J (2009) Multifocality in testicular germ cell tumors. J Urol 181(3):1114–1119. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.025 (discussion 1119–1120)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hargreave TB (1986) Carcinoma in situ of the testis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 293(6559):1389–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Skakkebaek NE (1972) Possible carcinoma-in situ of the testis. Lancet 2(7776):516–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Russo GI, Cimino S, Castelli T, Favilla V, Urzi D, Veroux M, Madonia M, Morgia G (2013) Percentage of cancer involvement in positive cores can predict unfavorable disease in men with low-risk prostate cancer but eligible for the prostate cancer international: active surveillance criteria. Urol Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmoll HJ, Souchon R, Krege S, Albers P, Beyer J, Kollmannsberger C, Fossa SD, Skakkebaek NE, de Wit R, Fizazi K, Droz JP, Pizzocaro G, Daugaard G, de Mulder PH, Horwich A, Oliver T, Huddart R, Rosti G, Paz Ares L, Pont O, Hartmann JT, Aass N, Algaba F, Bamberg M, Bodrogi I, Bokemeyer C, Classen J, Clemm S, Culine S, de Wit M, Derigs HG, Dieckmann KP, Flasshove M, Garcia del Muro X, Gerl A, Germa-Lluch JR, Hartmann M, Heidenreich A, Hoeltl W, Joffe J, Jones W, Kaiser G, Klepp O, Kliesch S, Kisbenedek L, Koehrmann KU, Kuczyk M, Laguna MP, Leiva O, Loy V, Mason MD, Mead GM, Mueller RP, Nicolai N, Oosterhof GO, Pottek T, Rick O, Schmidberger H, Sedlmayer F, Siegert W, Studer U, Tjulandin S, von der Maase H, Walz P, Weinknecht S, Weissbach L, Winter E, Wittekind C (2004) European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 15(9):1377–1399. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict interest

Each author discloses that no competing financial interests exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Ivan Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favilla, V., Russo, G.I., Spitaleri, F. et al. Multifocality in testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT): what is the significance of this finding?. Int Urol Nephrol 46, 1131–1135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0617-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0617-6

Keywords

Navigation