Skip to main content
Log in

Wool characteristics in the third generation of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbreed sheep

  • SI Fat Tailed Sheep
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation was conducted to evaluate the comparative productive performances and effect of some environmental factors on wool characteristics of Arkharmerino × Ghezel (Ar × Gh) and Arkharmerino × Moghani (Ar × Mo) crossbreed sheep. The mid-side fleece samples taken from animals during 2 years (2007–2008) were analyzed. Each sample was measured for average fiber diameter, fiber diameter variability, staple length, proportion of medullated fiber, proportion of kemp, and comfort factor. The comparative values for these fleece characteristics in F3 generation Ar × Gh were 28.78 ± 0.48 μm, 36.84 ± 1.16%, 11.94 ± 0.35 cm, 7.07 ± 0.93%, 1.02 ± 0.23%, and 68.93%, respectively; while those traits were 29.79 ± 0.43 μm, 41.86 ± 1.16%, 11.96 ± 0.37 cm, 8.13 ± 1.06%, 2.71 ± 0.45%, and 63.33 ± 3.66% for Ar × Mo, respectively. The effects of genotype, sex, birth type, and year of birth were analyzed. Genotype had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on average fiber diameter and proportion of kemp, and Ar × Gh crossbreeds had lower diameter with less proportion of kemp. The two differences in fiber characteristics that were attributable to sex were fiber diameter variability and proportion of medullated fiber, and females had higher measure than males for both traits. Statistical analysis showed that crossbreeding with Arkharmerino generally had positive effects on the fleece favored to be used in the hand woven authentic carpet production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM, 1989a. Standard test method for diameter of wool and other animal fibers by micro projection, D2130-90.

  • ASTM, 1989b. Standard test method for med and kemp fibers in wool and other animal fibers by microprojection, D2968-83.

  • AWTA, 2008. Wool diameter: fact and fiction, Australian Wool and Textile Association, Available at www.awta.com.au.

  • Brash, L.D., Fogarty, N.M. and Gilmour, A.R., 1994. Genetic parameters for Australian maternal and dual-purpose meat sheep breeds. I. Live weight, wool-production and reproduction in Border Leicester and related types, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45, 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, R., Thomas, D.L., Nash, T.G. and Lupton, C.J., 1996. Performance of hair breeds and prolific wool breeds of sheep in Southern Illinois: wool production and fleece quality, Journal of Animal Science, 74, 25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cedillo, R.M., Hohenboken, W. and Drummond, J., 1977. Genetic and environmental effects on age at first estrus and on wool and lamb production of crossbred ewe lambs, Journal of Animal Science, 44, 948–955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Çolakoglu, N. and Özebyaz, C., 1999. Comparison of some production traits in Malya and Akkaraman sheep, Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 23, 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çorekci, S.G. and Evrum, M., 2000. Comparative studies on the production performances of Chios and Imroz breeds kept under semi-intensive conditions II. Milk production, fleece yields and characteristics, Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 24, 545–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashab, G., Edriss, M.A., Ghare Aghaji, A.A., Movasagh, H. and Nilforoshan, M.A., 2006. Wool fiber quality of Naeini sheep, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, J., 2003. Perspectivas de la producci´on de fibra de llama en Bolivia, (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Hohenheim).

  • Delgado, J., Valle Zarate, A. and Mamani, C., 1999. Fiber quality of a Bolivian meat-oriented llama population, Progress in South American Camelids Research, EAAP Publication No. 105, 2001, 101–109.

  • Demir, H. and Baspinar, H., 1992. Production performance of Kivircik sheep under semi-intensive conditions. 2. Fertility, milk production, body weight and wool characteristics of ewes. Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Istanbul, 17 (2), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J.L. and Sumner, R.M.W., 1996. Development of fiber and follicle characteristics related to wool bulk in Perendale sheep over the first year of life. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 56, 314–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahvash, T., Shodja, J., Rafat A. and Keshtkaran, A., 2010. The effect of bilateral crossbreeding between arkhamerino and ghezel sheep on the quality of wool of their F1 crosses, Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 6, 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iniguez, L.C., Alem, R., Wauer, A. and Mueller, J., 1998. Fleece types, fiber characteristics and production system of an outstanding llama population from Southern Bolivia, Small Ruminant Research, 30, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempester, A.J., Croston, D., Guy, D.R. and Jones, D.W., 1987. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred lambs by ten sire breed, compared at the same estimated carcass subcutaneous fat proportion, Animal Production Science, 44, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, C.J., Freking, B.A. and Leymaster, K.A., 2004. Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: III. Wool characteristics of F1 ewes, Journal of Animal Science, 82, 2293–2300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, C.J., McColl, A. and Stobart, R.H., 2006. Fiber characteristics of the Huacaya Alpaca, Small Ruminant Research, 64, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, Z., I˜niguez, L.C. and Rodr´ıguez, T., 1997. Influence of effects on quality traits and relationships between traits of the llama fleece, Small Ruminant Research, 24, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, B.A. and Butler, K.L., 2004. Sources of variation in fiber diameter attributes of Australian alpacas and implication for fleece evaluation and animal selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55(4), 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S.C., Choprn, S.K., Singh, V.K., Ayub, M. and Mahrotra, V., 2004. Production and quality of wool in Magra breed of sheep, Indian Journal of Animal Science, 74 (7), 792–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhber, M., 2005. Evaluation of wool characteristics of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbreed sheep in second generation (MSc Thesis, University of Tabriz)

  • Notter, D.R. and Hough, J.D., 1997. Genetic parameter estimates for growth and fleece characteristics in Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 75, 1729–1737.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafat, S.A., Rochambeau, H.D, Brims, M., Thébault, R.G., Deretz, S., Bonnet, M. and Allain, D., 2007. Characteristics of Angora rabbit fiber using optical fiber diameter analyzer, Journal of Animal Science, 85, 3116–3122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Safari, E., Fogarty, N.M. and Gilmour, A. R., 2005. A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep, Livestock Production Science, 92, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 2004. SAS/STAT Software Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

  • Shodja, J., Farahvash, T. and Rafat, S.A., 2004. The evaluation of fleece characteristics in Arkharmerino × Moghani F1 crossbreds, Proceedings of the 11th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Kuala Lumpour, 624–626.

  • Sidwell, G. M., Wilson, R. L. and Hourihan, M.E., 1973. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. IV: effect of crossbreeding on wool production, Journal of Animal Science, 32, 1099–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabbaa, M.J., Al-Azzawi, W.A. and Campbell, D., 2001. Variation in fleece characteristics of Awassi sheep at different ages, Small Ruminant Research, 41, 95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tekin, M.E., Gurkan, M. and Kadak, R., 1998. The wool characteristics of Akkaraman, Awassi and their F1 and B1 crossbreed with German Blackheaded Mutton and Hampshire Down breed, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 118, 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, B.T., Smith, C. and Sales, D.I., 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep, Animal Production Science, 31, 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuliji, T.G., Davis, H.K., Dodds, G., Turner, P.R., Andrews, R.N. and Bruce, G.D., 2000. Production performance, repeatability and heritability estimates for live weight, fleece weight and fiber characteristics of alpacas in New Zealand, Small Ruminant Research , 37, 189–201

  • Wurzinger, M., Delgado, J., Nurnberg, M., Valle Z´arate, A., Stemmer, A., Ugarte, G. and Solkner, J., 2005. Genetic and non-genetic factors influencing fiber quality of Bolivian llamas, Small Ruminant Research, 6, 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, A., Ozcan, M., Ekiz, B., Ceyhan, A. and Altinel, A., 2003. The body weights and wool characteristics of the indigenous Imroz and Kivircik sheep breeds of Turkey, Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding, 51(1), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the staff of the Khalat Poshan Research Station and Mr. Davood Teimoury for their invaluable research assistance and specific thanks to the reviewers and Dr. André de Almeida for their helpful suggestions and constructive comments which led to a substantial improvement of submitted manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Esfandyari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esfandyari, H., Aslaminejad, A.A. & Rafat, S.A. Wool characteristics in the third generation of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbreed sheep. Trop Anim Health Prod 43, 1337–1343 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9862-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9862-9

Keyword

Navigation