Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of improved dual purpose chickens under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to analyze the low input backyard poultry production system practiced by the tribal farmers, and evaluate the performance of an improved dual-purpose breed, the Vanaraja. Results revealed that a significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of farmers used temporary, non-conventional poultry houses made of locally available materials, such as bamboo and wood. Most of the farmers (65.9 %) did not provide balanced feed to their poultry and did not vaccinate their birds against any disease. Under standard management conditions, the average body weight of Vanaraja birds at 6 weeks was 625 ± 10.9 g. Under backyard conditions, the body weight at 18 months was 3.6 ± 0.8 kg. The age at first egg was 154 ± 9 days in the backyard system, whereas under the intensive system it was 196 ± 4 days. Annual production under the backyard and intensive systems of rearing was 176 ± 9 and 152 ± 7 eggs, respectively. Mortality of adult birds was 12 % and predation by foxes and wild cats accounted for 1.67 %. This study revealed that village chickens are an important income source for household expenses, and that traditional free-range poultry production in the smallholder sector of developing countries can possibly be improved through the use of improved dual-purpose birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ghosh, M. K., Ahmed, F.A., Buragohain, R., Pathak, P.K. and Bhattacharya, M. 2005. Growth performance of Vanaraja birds in high altitude areas of Arunachal Pradesh under Backyard system of management. XXIII Annual Conference and National Symposium, Indian Poultry Science Association, Project Directorate on Poultry, Hyderabad, from 2–4 February 2005.pp.198

  • Gueye, E.H.F. 1998.Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 54,73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondombo, S.R., Nianogo, A.J., Kwakkel, R.P., Udo, H.M.Y. and Slingerland, M., 2003. Comparative analysis of village chicken production in two farming systems in Burkina Faso. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35 (6), 563–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaresan, A., Hussain, J., Ahmed, S.K., Pathak, K.A., Das, A.,and Bujarbaruah, K.M. 2005. Backyard Poultry in Mizoram: Status, Potential and Managemental Practices. Indian Farming. 55(5): 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaresan, A., Pathak, K.A., Bujarbaruah, K.M. and Anubrata Das. 2006. Backyard poultry production in Mizoram. Research bulletin No 48, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Barapani, Meghalaya.

  • Nguyen Thi Loc, Preston, T.R., and Ogle, R.B. 1997. Protein supplementation of traditional diets for crossbred pigs under village conditions in Central Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. (9) 2: 8–11

  • Padhi, M.K., Ahlawat, S.P.S., Senani, S., Saha, S.K. and Kundu, A. 2004. Comparative evaluation of White Leghorn, Brown Nicobari and their Crossbred in A & N Islands. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 74 (5): 557 – 558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M., Roy, T.C., and Bula Das. 2003. Genetic studies on some economic traits of White Leghorn chickens of Meghalaya. Indian Veterinary Journal, 80: 999 – 1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakuntala Devi. 2003. Time trend in egg quality traits and their inheritance in control population of White Leghorn. Indian Veterinary Journal, 80: 1030 – 1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santosh, H., Biswajit, D., Saxena, S.C. and Bujarbaruah, K.M. 2005. Effect of some liver stimulants on performance of Vanaraja chicken. XXIII Annual Conference and National Symposium, Indian Poultry Science Association, Project Directorate on Poultry, Hyderabad, from 2–4 February 2005.pp.198

  • Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

  • Statistical Abstract, 2002 – 2003. Department of Agriculture & Minor Irrigation, Govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kumaresan.

Additional information

Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Pathak, K.A., Chhetri, B., Ahmed, S.K and Haunshi,S., 2007. Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of an improved dual purpose chicken under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India. Tropical Animal Health and Production

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Pathak, K.A. et al. Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of improved dual purpose chickens under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India. Trop Anim Health Prod 40, 395–402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9097-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9097-y

Keywords

Navigation