Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of Permeability Heterogeneity on Miscible CO2 Flooding Efficiency in Sandstone Reservoirs: An Experimental Investigation

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we systematically investigate the effect of core-scale heterogeneity on the performance of miscible CO2 flooding under various injection modes (secondary and tertiary). Manufactured heterogeneous core plugs are used to simulate vertical and horizontal heterogeneity that may be present in a reservoir. A sample with vertical heterogeneity (i.e. a layered sample) is constructed using two axially cut half plugs each with a distinctly different permeability value. In these samples, the permeability ratio (PR) defines the ratio between the permeabilities of adjacent half plugs. Horizontal heterogeneity (i.e. a composite sample) is introduced by stacking two or three short cylindrical core segments each with a different permeability value. Our special sample construction techniques have also enabled us to investigate the effect of permeability ratio and crossflow in layered samples and axial arrangement of core segments in composite samples on the ultimate recovery of the floods. Core flooding experiments are conducted with an n-Decane–brine–CO2 system at a pore pressure of 17.2 MPa and a temperature of 343 K. At this temperature, the minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 with n-Decane is 12.6–12.7 MPa so it is expected that at 17.2 MPa CO2 is fully miscible with n-Decane. The results obtained for both the composite and layered samples indicate that CO2 injection would achieve the highest recovery factor (RF) when performed under the secondary mode (e.g. layered: 79.00%, composite: 89.83%) compared with the tertiary mode (e.g. layered: 73.2%, composite: 86.2%). This may be attributed to the effect of water shielding which impedes the access of the injected CO2 to the residual oil under the tertiary injection mode. It is also found that the oil recovery from a layered sample decreases noticeably with an increase in the PR as higher PR makes the displacement more uneven due to CO2 channelling. The RFs of 93.4, 87.89, 77.9 and 69.8% correspond to PRs of 1, 2.5, 5, and 12.5, respectively. In addition, for the layered samples, crossflow was found to have an important role during the recovery process; however, due to excessive channelling, this effect tends to diminish as PR increases. Compared with the layered heterogeneity, the effect of composite heterogeneity on the RF seems to be very subtle as the RF is found to be almost independent from the permeability sequence along the length of a composite sample. This outcome may have been caused by the small diameter of the plugs resulting in invariable 1-D floods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Sulaiman, A.A., Krinis, D., Hossain, M.E.: Assessment of capillary pressure heterogeneity to optimize oil recovery and development cost of carbon dioxide floods. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2016)

  • Al Wahaibi, Y.M., Al Hadhrami, A.K.: First-contact-miscible, vaporizing- and condensing-gas drive processes in a channeling heterogeneity system. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)

  • Al-Bayati, D., et al.: An experimental investigation of immiscible CO2 flooding efficiency in sandstone reservoirs: influence of permeability heterogeneity. In: SPE Europec Featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Copenhagen (2018)

  • Almehaideb, R.A., Shedid, S.A., Zekri, A.Y.: Laboratory study of miscible carbon dioxide flooding of UAE carbonate oil reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2008)

  • Alvarado, V., Manrique, E.: Enhanced oil recovery: an update review. Energies 3(9), 1529–1575 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahralolom, I.M., Bretz, R.E., Orr Jr., F.M.: Experimental investigation of the interaction of phase behavior with microscopic heterogeneity in a CO2 flood. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 3, 662–672 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikkina, P., et al.: Influence of wettability and permeability heterogeneity on miscible CO2 flooding efficiency. Fuel 166, 219–226 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.E., Mohanty, K.K.: Mass transfer from bypassed zones during gas injection. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 12, 124–130 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaouche, M., et al.: Capillary effects in immiscible flows in heterogeneous porous media. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 21(1), 19 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, A.: Reservoir descriptions via pulse testing: a technology evaluation. In: International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1988)

  • Cooney, G., et al.: Evaluating the climate benefits of CO2-enhanced oil recovery using life cycle analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(12), 7491–7500 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dindoruk, B., Firoozabadi, A.: Crossflow in fractured/layered media incorporating gravity, viscous, and phase behavior effects: part I-formulation and features in layered media. SPE J. 2(02), 120–135 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, M., et al.: Extraction and its effects on crude oil properties during CO2 flooding. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 35(23), 2233–2241 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, M., et al.: Oil recovery from a CO2 injection in heterogeneous reservoirs: the influence of permeability heterogeneity, CO2–oil miscibility and injection pattern. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 44, 140–149 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, E.C., et al.: Enhanced Oil Recovery. I. Fundamentals and Analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Enick, R.M., et al.: Mobility and conformance control for CO2 EOR via thickeners, foams, and gels—a literature review of 40 years of research and pilot tests. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  • Fayers, F.J., Lee, S.-T.: Crossflow mechanisms by gas drive in heterogeneous reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1992)

  • Fernø, M.A., et al.: Parametric study of oil recovery during CO2 injections in fractured chalk: influence of fracture permeability, diffusion length and water saturation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 27, Part 2, 1063–1073 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, A., et al.: Interfacial tension measurements and modelling of (carbon dioxide + n-alkane) and (carbon dioxide + water) binary mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures. J. Supercrit. Fluids 55(2), 743–754 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghedan, S.G.: Global laboratory experience of CO2-EOR flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2009)

  • Grigg, R.B., Schechter, D.S.: State of the industry in CO2 floods. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)

  • He, L., et al.: Potential evaluation of CO2 EOR and sequestration in Yanchang oilfield. J. Energy Inst. 89(2), 215–221 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L.: Carbon dioxide solvent flooding for increased oil recovery. SPE 216, 225–231 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L., Josendal, V.: Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbon dioxide. J. Pet. Technol. 26(12), 1427–1438 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, P., et al.: Practical Aspects of CO2 Flooding. SPE Monograph, vol. 22. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Martínez, J., et al.: Mixing in a three-phase system: enhanced production of oil-wet reservoirs by CO2 injection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43(1), 196–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, F., Hussain, F., Cinar, Y.: An experimental and numerical analysis of water-alternating-gas and simultaneous-water-and-gas displacements for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery and storage. SPE J. 20, 227–237 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, M., et al.: Mechanistic investigation of bypassed-oil recovery during CO2 injection in matrix and fracture. Fuel 117, Part A, 43–49 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M.H., Perrin, J.-C., Benson, S.M.: Modeling permeability distributions in a sandstone core for history matching coreflood experiments. SPE J. 16(04), 768–777 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, M.M., Rao, D.N.: Experimental investigation of miscible secondary gas injection. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2005)

  • Lake, W.: Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, L., Jensen, J.: A review of heterogeneity measures used in reservoir characterization. SPE (1989)

  • Langaas, K., Ekrann, S., Ebeltoft, E.: A criterion for ordering individuals in a composite core. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 19(1), 21–32 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., et al.: An improved method to study CO2–oil relative permeability under miscible conditions. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 5(1), 45–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobakht, M., Moghadam, S., Gu, Y.: Mutual interactions between crude oil and CO2 under different pressures. Fluid Phase Equilib. 265(1), 94–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, K.K., Orr Jr., F.M.: Effect of viscous crossflow on miscibility development in a two-layer flow system: part I—ternary vaporizing gas drives. Soc. Pet. Eng. Adv. Technol. Ser. 2, 7–17 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pini, R., Krevor, S.C.M., Benson, S.M.: Capillary pressure and heterogeneity for the CO2/water system in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions. Adv. Water Resour. 38, 48–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pini, R., et al.: Capillary heterogeneity in sandstone rocks during CO2/water core-flooding experiments. Energy Procedia 37, 5473–5479 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, L., Leas, W.: Properties of linear waterfloods. J. Pet. Technol. 5(05), 139–148 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeedi, A.: Experimental Study of Multiphase Flow in Porous Media During CO2 Geo-Sequestration Processes. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saeedi, A., et al.: Multiphase flow behaviour during CO2 geo-sequestration: emphasis on the effect of cyclic CO2–brine flooding. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 79(3–4), 65–85 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, R., Robinson, R., Gasem, K.: An automated apparatus for equilibrium phase compositions, densities, and interfacial tensions: data for carbon dioxide + decane. Fluid Phase Equilib. 179(1), 43–66 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedid, S.: Influences of different modes of reservoir heterogeneity on performance and oil recovery of carbon dioxide miscible flooding. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 48(02), 29–36 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, M., et al.: Mechanisms of oil recovery by carbonated water injection. In: SCA Annual Meeting (2009)

  • Stalkup, F.I.: Miscible Displacement. SIAM, Philadelphia (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, D., Yellig, W.: Effects of mobile water on multiple-contact miscible gas displacements. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 23(03), 447–455 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, J., Babadali, T.: Optimal injection strategies for CO2 and flue gas sequestration during tertiary oil recovery. Oil Gas Eur. Mag. 33, 22–26 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunio, S.Q., et al.: Comparison of different enhanced oil recovery techniques for better oil productivity. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 1(5), 143–153 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorton, L.P., Kieschnick, W.F.: A Preliminary Report on Oil Recovery by High-Pressure Gas Injection. American Petroleum Institute, Washington (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorton, L.P., Brownscombe, E.R., Dyes, A.B.: Method for producing oil by means of carbon dioxide, U.s.p. office, editor (1952)

  • Yongmao, H., et al.: Laboratory investigation of CO2 flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2004)

  • Zapata, V.J., Lake, L.W.: A theoretical analysis of viscous crossflow. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1981)

  • Zekri, A.R.Y., Shedid, S.A., Almehaideb, R.A.: Experimental investigations of variations in petrophysical rock properties due to carbon dioxide flooding in oil heterogeneous low permeability carbonate reservoirs. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 3(4), 265–277 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D.F., Liao, X.W., Yin, D.D.: Evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and sequestration potential in low permeability reservoirs, Yanchang Oilfield, China. J. Energy Inst. 87(4), 306–313 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., et al.: CO2 mobility control and sweep efficiency improvement using starch gel or ethylenediamine in ultra-low permeability oil layers with different types of heterogeneity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 133, 52–65 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., et al.: Novel insights into IOR/EOR by seawater and supercritical CO2 miscible flooding using dual carbonate cores at reservoir conditions. Saudi Aramco J. Technol. (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duraid Al-Bayati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Bayati, D., Saeedi, A., Xie, Q. et al. Influence of Permeability Heterogeneity on Miscible CO2 Flooding Efficiency in Sandstone Reservoirs: An Experimental Investigation. Transp Porous Med 125, 341–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1121-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1121-3

Keywords

Navigation