Abstract
We report new developments concerning the symmetry properties and their actions on special solutions allowed by certain field theory models on the noncommutative plane. In particular, we seek Galilean-invariant models. The analysis indicates that this requirement strongly restricts the admissible interactions. Moreover, if a scalar field is coupled to a gauge field, then a geometric phase emerges for vortexlike solutions transformed by Galilean boosts.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, Rev. Modern Phys., 73, 977 (2001).
R. J. Szabo, Phys. Rep., 378, 207 (2003); hep-th/0109162 (2001).
R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50, 1395 (1983).
D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, 772 (1984).
S. M. Girvin and T. Jach, Phys. Rev. A, 29, 5617 (1984).
P. A. Horvathy, L. Martina, and P. C. Stichel, “Enlarged Galilean symmetry of anyons and the Hall effect,” hep-th/0412090 (2004).
M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B, 53, 7010 (1996).
A. Bohm, A. Mostafazadeh, H. Koizumi, Q. Niu, and J. Zwanziger, The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems, Springer, Berlin (2003).
J. Lukierski, P. C. Stichel, and W. J. Zakrzewski, Ann. Phys., 260, 224 (1997); 306, 78 (2003); hep-th/0207149 (2002).
C. Duval and P. A. Horvathy, Phys. Lett. B, 479, 284 (2000); hep-th/0002233 (2000); J. Phys. A, 34, 10097 (2001); hep-th/0106089 (2001); P. A. Horvathy, Ann. Phys. 299, 128 (2002); hep-th/0201007 (2002).
J.-M. Levy-Leblond, “Galilei group and Galilean invariance,” in: Group Theory and Applications (E. Loebl, ed.), Vol. 2, Acad. Press, New York (1971), p. 221; A. Ballesteros, N. Gadella, and M. del Olmo, J. Math. Phys., 33, 3379 (1992); Y. Brihaye, C. Gonera, S. Giller, and P. Kosinski, “Galilean invariance in 2+1 dimensions,” hep-th/9503046 (1995); D. R. Grigore, J. Math. Phys., 37, 240, 460 (1996).
L. Susskind, “The quantum Hall fluid and non-commutative Chern Simons theory,” hep-th/0101029 (2001).
G. S. Lozano, E. F. Moreno, and F. A. Schaposnik, JHEP, 0102, 036 (2001); hep-th/0012266 (2000); F. A. Schaposnik, “Three lectures on noncommutative field theories,” hep-th/0408132 (2004).
D. Bak, S. K. Kim, K.-S. Soh, and J. H. Yee, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 025018 (2001).
D. Bak, K. Lee, and J.-H. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 030402 (2001).
D. Bak, S. K. Kim, K.-S. Soh, and J. H. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 3087 (2000).
P. A. Horvathy, L. Martina, and P. C. Stichel, Phys. Lett. B, 564, 149 (2003).
P. A. Horvathy, L. Martina, and P. C. Stichel, Nucl. Phys. B, 673, 301 (2003).
P. A. Horvathy and P. C. Stichel, Phys. Lett. B, 583, 353 (2004).
L. Hadasz, U. Lindstrom, M. Rocek, and R. von Unge, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 105020 (2004).
R. Jackiw, Phys. Today, 25, 23 (1980); U. Niederer, Helv. Phys. Acta, 45, 802 (1972); C. R. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D, 5, 377 (1972).
E. Langmann and R. J. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B, 533, 168 (2002); E. Langmann, Nucl. Phys. B, 654, 404 (2003); E. Langmann, R. J. Szabo, and K. Zarembo, “Exact solution of noncommutative field theory in background magnetic fields,” hep-th/0303082 (2003).
N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP, 09, 032 (1999).
R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 1116031 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 144, No. 1, pp. 64–73, July, 2005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horvathy, P.A., Martina, L. & Stichel, P.C. Symmetries of Field Theories on the Noncommutative Plane. Theor Math Phys 144, 935–943 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-005-0120-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-005-0120-z