Skip to main content
Log in

Systems without a graphical causal representation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 February 2015

Abstract

There are simple mechanical systems that elude causal representation. We describe one that cannot be represented in a single directed acyclic graph. Our case suggests limitations on the use of causal graphs for causal inference and makes salient the point that causal relations among variables depend upon details of causal setups, including values of variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See also Woodward (2003, p. 234).

  2. The possibility that some systems cannot be represented in any single causal graph is implied by an example Glymour considers (2010, p. 202).

  3. Here we are interpreting directed acyclic graphs in the way specified by Pearl (2009) and Spirtes et al. (1993).

  4. Below we consider the possibility that there are arrows going in both directions between P and V.

  5. Korb et al. (2004) model interventions in such a way that they do not necessarily wipe out a variable’s relationship to its prior causes, but might merely alter its probability distribution. But even interventions of this sort are incapable of rendering some of a variable’s causes inactive while activating others. See also Eberhardt and Scheines (2007).

  6. See, for example, Strotz and Wold (1960) and Glymour et al. (2001, pp. 297–299).

References

  • Eberhardt, F., & Scheines, R. (2007). Interventions and causal inference. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 981–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (1998). Causal asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (2005). Causal relata: Tokens, types or variables. Erkenntnis, 63, 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C., Richard, S., & Peter, S. (2001). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (2010). What is right with ‘Bayes Net Methods’ and what is wrong with ‘Hunting Causes and Using Them’? British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 61, 161–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judea, P. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korb, K. B., Nicholson, L. R., & Axnick, K. (2004). Varieties of causal intervention. PRICAI 2004: Trends in artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, prediction and search. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, R. H., & Wold, H. O. A. (1960). Recursive versus nonrecursive systems: An attempt at synthesis. Econometrica, 28, 417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J., & Robins, J. M. (2007). Four types of effect modification: A classification based on directed acyclic graphs. Epidemiology, 18(5), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Elliott Sober and Jim Woodward for helpful discussion. We are grateful to several anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naftali Weinberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausman, D.M., Stern, R. & Weinberger, N. Systems without a graphical causal representation. Synthese 191, 1925–1930 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0380-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0380-3

Keywords

Navigation