Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emergence and singular limits

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent work by Robert Batterman and Alexander Rueger has brought attention to cases in physics in which governing laws at the base level “break down” and singular limit relations obtain between base- and upper-level theories. As a result, they claim, these are cases with emergent upper-level properties. This paper contends that this inference—from singular limits to explanatory failure, novelty or irreducibility, and then to emergence—is mistaken. The van der Pol nonlinear oscillator is used to show that there can be a full explanation of upper-level properties entirely in base-level terms even when singular limits are present. Whether upper-level properties are emergent depends not on the presence of a singular limit but rather on details of the ampliative approximation methods used. The paper suggests that focusing on explanatory deficiency at the base level is key to understanding emergence in physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batterman R. W. (1997) Into a mist: Asymptotic theories on a caustic. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28B(3): 395–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman R. W. (2002a) Asymptotics and the role of minimal models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53(1): 21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman R. W. (2002b) The Devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman R. W. (2005a) Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36B(2): 225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman R. W. (2005b) Response to Belot’s “Whose devil? Which details?”. Philosophy of Science 72(1): 154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman R. W. (2009) Idealization and modeling. Synthese 169: 427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedau M. A. (1997) Weak emergence. In: Tomberlin J. (eds) Philosophical perspectives: Mind, Causation and world. Blackwell, Malden, pp 375–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau M. A. (2008) Is weak emergence just in the mind?. Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science 18(4): 443–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Belot G. (2005) Whose devil? Which details?. Philosophy of Science 72(1): 128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad C. D. (1925) The mind and its place in nature. Routledge & K. Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P. (1997) How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P. (2008) Computational and conceptual emergence. Philosophy of Science 75(5): 584–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1999) Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (2006) Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese 151(3): 547–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, P. (2007). Comments on Andrew Wayne’s ‘Singular limits, explanation and emergence in physics’. Pacific APA meeting.

  • Nagel E. (1961) The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt, Brace World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles T. (1973) Two concepts of inter-theoretic reduction. Journal of Philosophy 70(7): 181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redhead M. (2004) Asymptotic reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35B(3): 527–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueger A. (2000a) Physical emergence, diachronic and synchronic. Synthese 124: 297–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueger A. (2000b) Robust supervenience and emergence. Philosophy of Science 67: 466–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueger A. (2001) Explanations at multiple levels. Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence 11(4): 503–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueger A. (2004) Reduction, autonomy, and causal exclusion among physical properties. Synthese 139(1): 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueger A. (2006) Functional reduction and emergence in the physical sciences. Synthese 151(3): 335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner K. F. (1976) Reduction in biology: Prospects and problems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32: 613–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner K. F. (2008) Theories, models, and equations in biology: The heuristic search for emergent simplifications in neurobiology. Philosophy of Science 75(5): 1008–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Pol B., van der Mark J. (1928) The heartbeat considered as a relaxation oscillation, and an electrical model of the heart. Philosophical Magazine 6: 763–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A. (2010). Expanding the scope of explanatory idealization. Philosophy of Science (forthcoming).

  • Wayne A., Arciszewski M. (2009) Emergence in physics. Philosophy Compass 4(1): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of philosophy, University of Guelph, Guelph, NIG 2W1, Canada

    Andrew Wayne

Authors
  1. Andrew Wayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Wayne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wayne, A. Emergence and singular limits. Synthese 184, 341–356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9817-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9817-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation