Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of railroad user count using number of route searches via bivariate state–space modeling

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional demand-prediction methods predominantly rely on past user behaviors to predict regular future transportation demands using acquired user preference data. Nevertheless, predicting unforeseen travel demands arising from bad weather or emergency events remains challenging owing to the absence of data on such future contingencies. This study introduces a method to predict travel demand by leveraging search history data, which potentially signal unforeseen travel requirements. We elucidate the correlation between the search count and integrated circuit (IC) card usage on an aggregate level. Subsequently, we propose a two-stage analytical technique to estimate the number of IC card usages based on route-search counts. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed model has superior accuracy, and the route-search count plays a pivotal role in predicting the number of IC card usages, especially unforeseen shifts in demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Takamastu-Kotohira Electric Railroad Co. Ltd. but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Takamastu-Kotohira Electric Railroad Co. Ltd.

References

  1. Hao S, Lee DH, Zhao D (2019) Sequence to sequence learning with attention mechanism for short-term passenger flow prediction in large-scale metro system. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 107:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liyanage S, Abduljabbar R, Dia H, Tsai PW (2022) AI-based neural network models for bus passenger demand forecasting using smart card data. J Urban Manage 11(3):365–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khattak AJ, De Palma A (1997) The impact of adverse weather conditions on the propensity to change travel decisions: a survey of Brussels commuters. Transp Res A Policy Pract 31(3):181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00025-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cools M, Moons E, Creemers L, Wets G (2010) Changes in travel behavior in response to weather conditions: do type of weather and trip purpose matter? Transp Res Rec 2157(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2157-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou M, Wang D, Li Q, Yue Y, Tu W, Cao R (2017) Impacts of weather on public transport ridership: results from mining data from different sources. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 75:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abad RPB, Fillone AM (2020) Changes in travel behavior during flood events in relation to transport modes: The case of Metro Manila, Philippines. Transp Res Proc 48:1592–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira FC, Rodrigues F, Ben-Akiva M (2015) Using data from the web to predict public transport arrivals under special events scenarios. J Intell Transp Syst 19(3):273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2013.868284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei M (2021) How does the weather affect public transit ridership? A model with weather-passenger variations. J Transport Geogr 98:103242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103242.

  9. Ohler F, Krempels KH, Möbus S (2017) Forecasting public transportation capacity utilisation considering external factors. VEHITS, 300–311. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006345703000311.

  10. Egu O, Bonnel P (2020) Investigating day-to-day variability of transit usage on a multimonth scale with smart card data. A case study in Lyon. Travel Behav Soc 19:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaller B (2002) Effective use of transit Websites: A synthesis of transit practice (No. 43). Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.

  12. Pelletier M, Trépanier M, Morency C (2011) Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 19(4):557–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Espinoza C, Munizaga M, Bustos B, Trépanier M (2018) Assessing the public transport travel behavior consistency from smart card data. Transp Res Proc 31:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaffash S, Nguyen AT, Zhu J (2021) Big data algorithms and applications in intelligent transportation system: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ 231:107868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107868.

  15. Meng C, Cui Y, He Q, Su L, Gao J (2017) Travel purpose inference with GPS trajectories, POIs, and geo-tagged social media data, vol 2017. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 1319–1324. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258062.

  16. Iliashenko O, Iliashenko V, Lukyanchenko E (2021) Big data in transport modelling and planning. Transp Res Proc 54:900–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison G, Grant-Muller SM, Hodgson FC (2020) New and emerging data forms in transportation planning and policy: Opportunities and challenges for “Track and Trace” data. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 117:102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102672.

  18. Alsger A, Tavassoli A, Mesbah M, Ferreira L, Hickman M (2018) Public transport trip purpose inference using smart card fare data. Transp Res C: Emerg Technol 87:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang L, Thakuriah PV (2012) Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the City of Chicago. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 22:146–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iliopoulou C, Kepaptsoglou K (2019) Combining ITS and optimization in public transportation planning: state of the art and future research paths. Eur Transp Res Rev 11(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0365-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, He SY, Leung Y (2018) Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research: a literature review. Travel Behav Soc 11:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zannat KE, Choudhury CF (2019) Emerging big data sources for public transport planning: a systematic review on current state of art and future research directions. J Indian Inst Sci 99(4):601–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00125-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mepparambath RM, Soh YS Jayaraman V. Tan HE, Ramli MA (2023) A novel modelling approach of integrated taxi and transit mode and route choice using city-scale emerging mobility data. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 170:103615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103615.

  24. Dixit M, Cats O, van Oort N, Brands T, Hoogendoors S (2023) Validation of a multi-modal transit route choice model using smartcard data. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-023-10387-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodnyansky S (2018) Do it yourself: obtaining updated transit stop and route shapefiles in urban and nonurban areas. Cityscape 20(1):205–214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26381228.

  26. Kujala R, Weckström C, Darst RK, Mladenović MN, Saramäki J (2018) A collection of public transport network data sets for 25 cities. Scientific Data 5(1):180089. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.89.

  27. Borole N, Rout D, Goel N, Vedagiri P, Mathew TV (2013) Multimodal public transit trip planner with real-time transit data. Proc Soc Behav Sci 104:775–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Z, Pel AJ, Verma T, Krishnakumar P, van Brakel P, van Oort N (2022) Effectiveness of trip planner data in predicting short-term bus ridership. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 142:103790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103790.

  29. Trépanier M, Chapleau R, Allard B (2005) Can trip planner log files analysis help in transit service planning? J Public Transp 8(2):79–103. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.8.2.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roosmalen JJ (2019) Forecasting bus ridership with trip planner usage data: A machine learning application. https://essay.utwente.nl/77590/, Master’s thesis. University of Twente.

  31. Chang GL, Wu J (1994) Recursive estimation of time-varying origin-destination flows from traffic counts in freeway corridors. Transp Res B Methodol 28(2):141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)90022-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Montero L, Codina E, Barceló J (2015) Dynamic OD transit matrix estimation: Formulation and model-building environment. In: Progress in systems engineering. Springer, Cham, 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08422-0_51.

  33. Rrecaj AA, Todorova MM (2018) Estimating short time interval densities in a CTM-KF model. Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J 3(2):85–89. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj030210.

  34. Durbin J, Koopman S (2012) Time series analysis by state space methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Elghafghuf A, Vanderstichel R, St-Hilaire S, Stryhn H (2018) Using state-space models to predict the abundance of juvenile and adult sea lice on Atlantic salmon. Epidemics 24:76–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to TAKAMATSU-KOTOHIRA ELECTRIC RAILROAD Co., Ltd. for providing the data for this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JSPS KAKENHI (grant Number JP20H02277).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, project administration, writing-review & editing, and supervision. MH helped in data curation, formal analysis, methodology, and software. TM performed methodology, validation, and writing-review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masashi Kuwano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuwano, M., Hosoe, M. & Moriyama, T. Prediction of railroad user count using number of route searches via bivariate state–space modeling. J Supercomput 80, 4554–4576 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05642-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05642-0

Keywords

Navigation