Abstract
In this article I wish to defend hope by arguing that it is a child-like predisposition and that its strength and uniqueness stem exactly from its naïve, infantilizing character. To discuss the concepts of hope and of childhood and the relationship between them, I read in Kazuo Ishiguro’s latest book – Klara and the Sun (2021), using Lyotard’s concepts of the inhuman, development, and infancy (1991, 1998). I argue for an alternative approach to childhood, in which it is not viewed merely as a basic developmental phase or as a lack in maturity but as an irreducible and potent element in human life, further showing that when understood as an event, childhood can be a strong basis for hope, and as such should be recognized by educators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this essay I intentionally refrain from discussing historical accounts of the concept of ‘childhood.’ While there is a vast body of literature on this important topic (Aries 1960; Fass 2013), I follow here Lyotard’s approach to infancy and childhood that is largely ahistorical and ignores specific temporal expressions of the phenomenon.
References
Aries, Phillip. 1960. Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. Vintage.
Bovens, Luc. 1999. The value of hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3): 667–681.
Camus, Albert. 1965. [1942]. In The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. London: Hamilton.
Dhillon, Pradeep, and Paul Standish, eds. 2013. Lyotard: just education. London: Routledge.
Eherenreich, Barbara. 2010. Bright-sided: how positive thinking is undermining America. New York: Picador Press.
Fass, Paula S. 2013. The Routledge history of childhood in the western world. Routledge.
Ford, Derek. 2021. Inhuman Educations Jean-François Lyotard, Pedagogy, Thought. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. 2021.
Ishiguro, Kazuo. 2021. Klara and the Sun. London: Faber.
Kant, Immanuel. 1784 [1959]. What is Enlightenment? Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment, tr. by L. W. Beck, New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1959.
Kant, Immanuel. 1781 [1998]. Critique of Pure Reason P. Guyer and A.W. Wood (transl. and eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, Cindi. 2004. Growing up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, Jean F. 1991. The inhuman: reflections on time. G. Bennington & R. Bowlby, Trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lyotard, Jean F. 1997. Postmodern fables. G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, Jean F. Return upon the return. 1999. Toward the postmodern Robert Harvey and Mark S. Roberts trans. and eds. 192–206.
Lyotard, Jean. F. 1992. Voices of a voice. G Van Den Abbeele Trans Discourse 14 (1): 126–245.
Lyotard, Jean F. 1999. The survivor. In Toward the Postmodern. Robert Harvey and Mark S. Roberts trans. And eds, 144–163. New York: Humanity books.
Marcel, Gabriel. 1951. [1962]. In Homo Viator: introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope. New York: Harper & Row.
Martin, Adrienne M. 2014. How we hope: a moral psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nietzsche, Friedreich. 1910. Human, all too human. H. Zimmern (Trans.). Edinburgh: T.N. Foulis.
Nuyen, A. T. 1997. Education for imaginative knowledge. Journal of Thought 32: 37–47.
Palumbo-Liu, David. 2000. Fables and apedagogy: Lyotard’s relevance for a pedagogy of the other. In Lyotard: just education. Dhillon, eds. P. A., & P. Standish, London: Routledge.
Pettit, Philip. 2004. Hope and its place in mind. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 592 (1): 152–165.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. Who is the subject of the Rights of Man? The South Atlantic Quarterly 103: 2/3.
Rogoff, Barbara. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smeyers, Paul, and Jan Masschelein. 2013. L’enfance, education and the politics of meaning. In Lyotard: just education, eds. P. Dhillon, and P. Standish, London: Routledge.
Spielberg Steven. 2001. A.I. Artificial intelligence. Warner bros.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
not aplicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zipory, O. Hope and Resistance in Lyotard’s Concept of Infancy. Stud Philos Educ 42, 247–259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09872-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09872-w