Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

(Mis)Understanding Strategy as a ‘Spectacular Intervention’: A Phenomenological Reflection on the Strategy Orientations Underpinning School Improvement in England

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of the ‘National Strategies’ for primary education in 1998, positioned ‘strategy’ as a powerful instrument for mobilising the school ‘workforce’ in England in the cause of continuous improvement. Government approaches to strategy formulation and enactment appear to reflect an instrumentalist orientation found in many mainstream strategic management publications. This paper reflects on how the strategic pursuit of quick, ‘spectacular’ gains may lead to the loss of ethics of care. Phenomenological insights into modes of being-in-the-world are drawn upon to suggest that a preoccupation with strategy and its accompanying ‘toolkit’ of targets, standards and inspections diminishes a deeper engagement with the meaning and purpose of education. Based on Heidegger’s premise that understanding is at the core of being human, it is posited that the concern with ‘spectacular’ outputs is both superficial and potentially de-humanising. At the root of strategic thinking and the resulting forgetfulness of being is the Cartesian dogma and its dualistic (mis)understandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state’. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2008). Instruction to deliver: Fighting to transform Britain’s public services. London: Methuen Pub. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2011). Deliverology 101: A field guide for educational leaders. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. (2000). The National Literacy Strategy: Review of research and other related evidence. Sudbury: DfEE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organisations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, C. H., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2006). Leading the strategically focused school: Success & sustainability. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2009). The essentials of school leadership (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools White Paper 2010. Available at: www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/Schools-White-Paper2010.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2012.

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2011). The National Strategies 19972011: A brief summary of the impact and effectiveness of the National Strategies. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/http://nsonline.org.uk/node/512121?uc=force_uj. Accessed 6 August 2013.

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for teaching. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). Excellence and enjoyment: A strategy for primary schools. London: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2004). Five year strategy for children and learners. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2006). Primary National Strategy: Primary framework for literacy and mathematics. Norwich: Crown Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (2005). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy (E.S. Haldane, Trans.). Stilwell: Digireads.com Publishing.

  • Ferguson, H. (2006). Phenomenological sociology: Insight and experience in modern society. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2010). A Heideggerian phenomenology approach to higher education as workplace: A consideration of academic professionalism. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(3), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (1999). Modern strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. M. (2012). Leadership and the reform of education. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Heidegger, M. (1975). Building dwelling thinking. In Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.) (pp. 141–161). New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

  • Hill, R., & Matthews, P. (2010). Schools leading schools II: The growing impact of National Leaders of Education. National College Publishing.

  • Jardine, D. W. (1998). To dwell with a boundless heart: Essays in curriculum theory, hermeneutics, and ecological imagination. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S. (2006). Education reform lessons from England: An interview with Sir Michael Barber. http://www.educationsector.org/publications/education-reform-lessons-england. Accessed 6 September 2012.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Quinn, J. (1991). The strategy process: Context, contexts, cases. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • National College for School Leadership (NCSL). (2001). ‘Think tank’ report to governing council. Nottingham: NCSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • National College for School Leadership (NCSL) (2012). System leadership prospectus. http://www.education.gov.uk/nationalcollege/docinfo?id=176721&filename=system-leadership-prospectus.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2012.

  • Philips, N., & Dar, S. (2009). Strategy. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1996). History of western philosophy. Bungay, Suffolk: The Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2010). Complexity and organisational reality: Uncertainty and the need to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronach, I. (2010). Globalizing education, educating the local: How method made us mad. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. ForgottenBooks.org.

  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: Suny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. (2011). Martin Heidegger. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/. Accessed 31 July 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers of a previous draft of this paper for their very insightful and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Bates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, A. (Mis)Understanding Strategy as a ‘Spectacular Intervention’: A Phenomenological Reflection on the Strategy Orientations Underpinning School Improvement in England. Stud Philos Educ 33, 353–367 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9382-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9382-3

Keywords

Navigation