Skip to main content
Log in

Insights into Operationalizing Communities of Practice from SSM-Based Inquiry Processes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two systemic inquiries, based on soft systems methodology (SSM), into the potential for using community of practice (CoP) theory by an Australian-government created research and development corporation to change its knowledge management (KM) strategy, are reported. Key staff were engaged in the inquiry into how to build a third-order KM strategy based on CoPs; an exploration of key published work on CoPs yielded four SSM activity models—‘being a community practice system’; ‘doing the work of imagination sub-system’; ‘doing the work of alignment sub-system’ and ‘doing the work of engagement sub-system’. These models can be used as heuristics to aid the purposeful design of CoPs in other settings. SSM, enacted as a systemic inquiry, can be understood as a form of systemic action research, which was well equipped to deal with CoP theory and, when enacted participatively, can generate important systemic insights. The inquiry began the process of fostering an appreciation of third order KM but, on the evidence available, did not lead to on-going commitment to a CoPs-based KM strategy. Future research should acknowledge how the framing of research situations influences the research process, the importance of the design of practice change settings and the limited evidence for purposeful interventions leading to successful CoPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The organisation L&WA was closed by the Australian Federal Government as part of cost-saving measures in the 2009 budget.

References

  • Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Roberts J (2008) Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice. Res Policy 37(2):353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) (2007) Tackling wicked problems: a public policy perspective. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore CP (2009) Learning systems and communities of practice for environmental decision making. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Communication & Systems Department, The Open University, Milton Keynes

  • Campbell A (2006) The Australian natural resource management knowledge system. Land and Water Australia: Canberra. http://triplehelix.com.au/documents/KnowledgeforManagingAustralianLandscapesfullversion_000.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2012

  • Campbell A, Schofield N (2007) The getting of knowledge: a guide to funding and managing applied research, 2nd edn. L&WA, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin S, Lave J (1993) Understanding practice perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2002) The role of the practitioner in a soft systems study. Q Newsl Open Univ Syst Soc March(27):S5–S11

  • Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action. A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice: includes a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1971) The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organizations. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10(4):381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN, Wagenaar H (2012) Navigating the eternally unfolding present: toward an epistemology of practice. Am Rev Public Admin 42(1):1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen P, Cottingham P, Doolan J, Edgar B, Ellis C, Fisher M, Flett D, Johnson D, Sealie L, Stocklmayer S, Vanclay F, Whittington J (2001) Knowledge seeking strategies of natural research professionals. Technical Report 2/2001, Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Land and Water Australia: Canberra

  • Duguid P (2008) ‘The art of knowing’: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. In: Amin A, Roberts J (eds) Community economic creativity and organization. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 69–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elshaiekh NM, Woods PC, Raman M (2010) The impact of KM on small and medium sized organisations in Sudan. J Inf Knowl Manag 9(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gausdal AH (2008) Developing regional communities of practice by network reflection: the case of the Norwegian electronics industry. Entrep Reg Dev 20(May):209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman J, Paucar-Caceres A (2011) A soft systems methodology (SSM) based framework for evaluating managed learning environments. Syst Pract Action Res 24(2):165–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iaquinto B, Ison R, Faggian R (2011) Creating communities of practice: scoping purposeful design. J Knowl Manag 15(1):4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL (2010) Systems practice. How to act in a climate-change world. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Russell DB (2000) Exploring some distinctions for the design of learning systems. Cybern Hum Knowing 7(4):43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Russell DB (2007) Agricultural extension and rural development: breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Russell DB (2011) The worlds we create: designing learning systems for the underworld of extension practice. In: Jennings J, Packham RP, Woodside D (eds) Shaping change: natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension. Australasia-Pacific Extension Network, Canberra, pp 52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Röling N, Watson D (2007) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning—legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgely G (2000) Systemic intervention philosopy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000) An idea ahead of its time: the history and development of soft systems methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 13(6):733–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Open University (2003) Systems primer Diagramming. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University (2006) Techniques for environmental decision making. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst G, Borzillo S (2008) Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. Eur Manage J 26:335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L (2007) Major paradigm shifts in NRM in Australia. Int J Global Environ 7(4):300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007) Community-based NRM boards of management: are they up to the task? Australas J Environ Manag 14:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Kanowski P (2011) ‘Crying for our country’: eight ways in which ‘Caring for our Country’ has undermined Australia’s regional model for natural resource management. Aust J Environ Manag 18(2):88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell DB, Ison RL, Gamble DR, Williams RK (1989) A critical review of rural extension theory and practice. Australian Wool Corporation/University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1995) The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change 27:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P (2011) Oral assessment: preparing learners for discourse in communities of practice. Syst Pract Action Res 24(3):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden D (2002) Complex acts of knowing; paradox and descriptive self awareness. J Knowl Manag 6(2):100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J (2003) Knowledge management in action? In: Holsapple CW (ed) Handbook of knowledge management 1: knowledge matters. Springer, New York, pp 271–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Scarborough H, Robertson M (2002) The construction of ‘Communities of Practice’ in the management of innovation. Manag Learn 33(4):477–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M (2005) Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organ Sci 16(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner G, Minonne C (2010) Measuring the effects of knowledge management practices. Electron J Knowl Manag 8(1):161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers G (1965) The art of judgement: a study of policy making. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice—learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2002) Building communities of practice: a developmental model. http://www.ewenger.com/. Accessed 29 March 2011

  • Wenger E (2010) Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore C (ed) Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer, London, pp 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, Snyder W (2000) Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Bus Rev 78:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice—a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna MS (2006) Tacit knowledge in communities of practice. In: Coakes E, Clarke S (eds) Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management. Idea Group, Hershey, pp 508–513

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank anonymous reviewers, Christine Ellis for her interest in this work, Andrew Campbell for making the work possible and L&WA for financial support. SRES (School of Resources, Environment & Society), now The Fenner School of Environment and Society, at the Australian National University supported the work through a Visiting Professorship to RLI. We are grateful to Phil Wallis for preparing Fig. 1 and Simon Kneebone for Fig. 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Ison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ison, R., Blackmore, C., Collins, K. et al. Insights into Operationalizing Communities of Practice from SSM-Based Inquiry Processes. Syst Pract Action Res 27, 91–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9275-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9275-3

Keywords

Navigation