Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Identities and Protesting Among College Students: Exploring Political Distinctiveness Mediation Factors

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the links between sexual identity and participation in political protests. Among a sample of college students (N = 2175), we determined that sexual minority students were three times more likely to join a protest than heterosexual students. “Political distinctiveness” theories are used to explain this sexual identity gap in protesting. Following a series of path analyses, we conclude that marital status, exposure to discrimination (as a victim or observer), connections to LGB communities, participation in political groups, and liberal identities mediate the sexuality difference in protesting. Conversely, measures of educational attainment, exposure to multicultural classes, and internalized homophobia were not mediators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The subsample of participants recruited from the convenience sample of students involved in LGBT organizations had attended more protests than those recruited through the other means (57.0% to 14.9%, chi-square = 36.11, p < .000). The subsample also differed on other variables, namely personal heterosexism (\(\bar{x}\) = 1.03 and \(\bar{x}\) == .07), ambient heterosexism (\(\bar{x}\) = 4.19 and \(\bar{x}\) = 2.42), supporting same-sex marriage (\(\bar{x}\) = 6.96 and \(\bar{x}\) = 5.50), having a liberal identity (\(\bar{x}\) = 5.92 and \(\bar{x}\) = 4.80), and being single (97% compared to 88%).

  2. The 240 respondents who selected mostly heterosexual suggest more sexual fluidity than the majority of people who chose completely heterosexual (n = 1785). Further, preliminary analyses (t tests and chi-square tests) indicate that mostly heterosexuals significantly differed from complete heterosexuals on every variable and differed with completely lesbian/gay on only three measures (personal exposure to heterosexism, ambient heterosexism, and number of LGBT friends).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Swank.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Eric Swank, Brittanie Atteberry-Ash, Simon Coulombe and Michael R. Woodford declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. It also has IRB approval from the University of Michigan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swank, E., Atteberry-Ash, B., Coulombe, S. et al. Sexual Identities and Protesting Among College Students: Exploring Political Distinctiveness Mediation Factors. Soc Just Res 33, 352–378 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00346-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00346-4

Keywords

Navigation