Abstract
This study examines the links between sexual identity and participation in political protests. Among a sample of college students (N = 2175), we determined that sexual minority students were three times more likely to join a protest than heterosexual students. “Political distinctiveness” theories are used to explain this sexual identity gap in protesting. Following a series of path analyses, we conclude that marital status, exposure to discrimination (as a victim or observer), connections to LGB communities, participation in political groups, and liberal identities mediate the sexuality difference in protesting. Conversely, measures of educational attainment, exposure to multicultural classes, and internalized homophobia were not mediators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The subsample of participants recruited from the convenience sample of students involved in LGBT organizations had attended more protests than those recruited through the other means (57.0% to 14.9%, chi-square = 36.11, p < .000). The subsample also differed on other variables, namely personal heterosexism (\(\bar{x}\) = 1.03 and \(\bar{x}\) == .07), ambient heterosexism (\(\bar{x}\) = 4.19 and \(\bar{x}\) = 2.42), supporting same-sex marriage (\(\bar{x}\) = 6.96 and \(\bar{x}\) = 5.50), having a liberal identity (\(\bar{x}\) = 5.92 and \(\bar{x}\) = 4.80), and being single (97% compared to 88%).
The 240 respondents who selected mostly heterosexual suggest more sexual fluidity than the majority of people who chose completely heterosexual (n = 1785). Further, preliminary analyses (t tests and chi-square tests) indicate that mostly heterosexuals significantly differed from complete heterosexuals on every variable and differed with completely lesbian/gay on only three measures (personal exposure to heterosexism, ambient heterosexism, and number of LGBT friends).
References
Andersen, E., & Jennings, M. K. (2010). Exploring multi-issue activism. PS: Political Science & Politics,43, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096510990604.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bailey, R. (1999). Gay politics, urban politics: Identity and economics in the urban setting. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barth, J., Overby, M., & Huffmon, S. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an antigay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly,62, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908317033.
Bishin, B. G., & Smith, C. A. (2013). When do legislators defy popular sovereignty? Testing theories of minority representation using DOMA. Political Research Quarterly,66(4), 794–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913475875.
Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States. Demography,37, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648117.
Bowman, N. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research,81, 29–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310383047.
Broadhurst, C., & Martin, G. L. (2014). Part of the “establishment”? Fostering positive campus climates for student activists. Journal of College and Character,15(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcc-2014-0012.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Burgess, E. O., & Baunach, D. M. (2014). Heterosexual allies? Understanding heterosexuals’ alliance with the gay community. Sexuality and Culture,18(4), 936–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9230-9.
Calcagno, J. (2016). Transforming straight guilt into collective action for LGBs via close cross-group friendships. Psychology of Women Quarterly,40(3), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315627362.
Carpenter, C. S. (2009). Sexual orientation and outcomes in college. Economics of Education Review,28(6), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.010.
Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (1996). Master framing and cross-movement networking in contemporary social movements. The Sociological Quarterly,37, 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb01755.x.
Case, K. A., Hensley, R., & Anderson, A. (2014). Reflecting on heterosexual and male privilege: Interventions to raise awareness. Journal of Social Issues,70(4), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12088.
Chenoweth, E., Finn, D., & Pressman, J. (2017, July 25). More people in the U.S. protested in June than in any month since the January Women’s Marches,” The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage.
Coley, J. S. (2014). Social movements and bridge building: Religious and sexual identity conflicts. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts & Change,37, 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20140000037005.
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science,25(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252.
Cravens, R. G. (2018). The politics of queer religion. Politics & Religion,11, 576–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048318000056.
Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Cole, E. R. (2015). Challenging the status quo: The role of intersectional awareness in activism for social change and pro-social intergroup attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly,39, 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315580439.
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology,30, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82.
Diamond, L. (2008). Sexual fluidity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology,20(3), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00159.
Dunn, T. L., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Heterosexist discrimination and LGBQ activism: Examining a moderated mediation model. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity,5(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000250.
Dwyer, P. C., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2013). When stigma-by-association threatens, self-esteem helps: Self-esteem protects volunteers in stigmatizing contexts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,35(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746605.
Egan, P. J. (2008). Explaining the distinctiveness of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals in American politics. Working paper, New York University. Social Science Research Network.
Egan, P. J. (2012). Group cohesion without group mobilization: The case of lesbians, gays and bisexuals. British Journal of Political Science,42, 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000500.
Egan, P. J. (2019). Identity as dependent variable: How Americans shift their identities to align with their politics. American Journal of Political Science (online first)
Egan, P. J., Edelman, M. S., & Sherrill, K. (2008). Findings from the Hunter College poll of lesbians, gays and bisexuals. New York: Hunter College.
Evans, N. J. (2000). Creating a positive learning environment for gay, lesbian, and bisexual students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,82, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8208.
Fine, L. E. (2015). Penalized or privileged? Sexual identity, gender, and postsecondary educational attainment. American Journal of Education,121, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1086/679393.
Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Frost, D. M., & Cabana, A. L. (2018). Queer solidarities: New activisms erupting at the intersection of structural precarity and radical misrecognition. Journal of Social and Political Psychology,6(2), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i2.905.
Fingerhut, A. W. (2011). Straight allies: What predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? Journal of Applied Social Psychology,41, 2230–2248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00807.x.
Fisher, D. R., Dow, D. M., & Ray, R. (2017). Intersectionality takes it to the streets: Mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women’s March. Science Advances,3(9), eaao1390. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao1390.
Flores, A. R. (2014). Reexamining context and same-sex marriage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research,26, 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu020.
Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Simoni, J. M., Kim, H. J., Lehavot, K., Walters, K. L., Yang, J., et al. (2014). The health equity promotion model: Reconceptualization of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health disparities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,84, 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000030.
Friedman, C., & Ayres, M. (2013). Predictors of feminist activism among sexual-minority and heterosexual college women. Journal of Homosexuality,60, 1726–1744. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.824335.
Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual-minority college women’s experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly,34, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01558.x.
Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2012). Measuring community connectedness among diverse sexual minority populations. Journal of Sex Research,49(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.565427.
Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Gates, G. J. (2014). LGB families and relationships: Analyses of the 2013 National Health Interview Survey. UCLA School of Law: Williams Institute.
Goldstein, S. B., & Davis, D. S. (2010). Heterosexual allies: A descriptive profile. Equity & Excellence in Education,43, 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2010.505464.
Gortmaker, V. J., & Brown, R. D. (2006). Out of the college closet: Differences in perceptions and experiences among out and closeted lesbian and gay students. College Student Journal,40, 606–619.
Greenwood, R. M. (2008). Intersectional political consciousness: Appreciation for intragroup differences and solidarity in diverse groups. Psychology of Women Quarterly,32, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00405.x.
Grollman, E. A. (2017). Sexual orientation differences in attitudes about sexuality, race, and gender. Social Science Research,61, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.05.002.
Grollman, E. A. (2019). Americans’ gender attitudes at the intersection of sexual orientation and gender. Journal of Homosexuality,66(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1398022.
Harnois, C. E. (2017). Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: How do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for gender activism? Sex Roles,77(3–4), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515607844.
Harr, B. E., & Kane, E. W. (2008). Intersectionality and queer student support for queer politics. Race, Gender & Class,15, 283–299.
Harris, A., Battle, J., Pastrana, A., & Daniels, J. (2015). Feelings of belonging: An exploratory analysis of the sociopolitical involvement of Black, Latina, and Asian/Pacific Islander sexual minority women. Journal of Homosexuality,62(10), 1374–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1061360.
Heaney, M. T. (2018). Making protest great again. Contexts,17(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766550.
Hettinger, V. E., & Vandello, J. A. (2014). Balance without equality: Just world beliefs, the gay affluence myth, and support for gay rights. Social Justice Research,27(4), 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0226-2.
Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., Gustafson, A. M., Seabrook, R. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment against men: Examining the roles of feminist activism, sexuality, and organizational context. Psychology of Men & Masculinity,17(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039151.
Hong, J. S., Woodford, M. R., Long, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2016). Ecological covariates of subtle and blatant heterosexist discrimination among LGBQ college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,45, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0362-5.
Hughes, B. E., & Hurtado, S. (2018). Thinking about sexual orientation: College experiences that predict identity salience. Journal of College Student Development,59(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0029.
Hyers, L. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-Black racism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles,56(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9142-8.
Jefferson, S. D., & Bramlett, F. (2010). The moderating roles of gender and anti-gay prejudice in explaining stigma by association in male dyads. Journal of Homosexuality,57(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903543113.
Jennings, M. K., & Andersen, E. A. (2003). The importance of social and political context: The case of AIDS activism. Political Behavior,25(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023851930080.
Jones, K. N., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). From awareness to action: Examining predictors of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activism for heterosexual people. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,87, 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000219.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology,25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
Kane, M. D. (2007). Timing matters: Shifts in the causal determinants of sodomy law decriminalization, 1961–1998. Social Problems,54, 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.2.211.
Katz-Wise, S. L. (2015). Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: Associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychology & Sexuality,6(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.876445.
Kazyak, E., & Stange, M. (2018). Backlash or a positive response? Public opinion of LGB issues after Obergefell v. Hodges. Journal of Homosexuality,65, 2028–2052. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1423216.
King, B. G., Bentele, K. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Protest and policymaking: Explaining fluctuation in congressional attention to rights issues, 1960–1986. Social Forces,86, 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0101.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.
Kleiman, S., Spanierman, L., & Grant-Smith, N. (2015). Translating oppression: Understanding how sexual minority status is associated with White men’s racial attitudes. Psychology of Men & Masculinity,16, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038797.
Kroeper, K. M., Sanchez, D. T., & Himmelstein, M. S. (2014). Heterosexual men’s confrontation of sexual prejudice: The role of precarious manhood. Sex Roles,70(1–2), 1–13.
Lewis, G. B., Rogers, M. A., & Sherrill, K. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual voters in the 2000 US presidential election. Politics & Policy,39, 655–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17471346.2011.00315.x.
Li, S. D. (2011). Testing mediation using multiple regression and structural equation modeling analyses in secondary data. Evaluation Review,35(3), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X11412069.
Lombardi, E. (1999). Integration within a transgender social network and its effect upon members’ social and political activity. Journal of Homosexuality,37, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v37n01_08.
Longerbeam, S. D., Inkelas, K. K., Johnson, D. R., & Lee, Z. S. (2007). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual college student experiences: An exploratory study. Journal of College Student Development,48(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0017.
Louis, W. R., Amiot, C. E., Thomas, E. F., & Blackwood, L. (2016). The “activist identity” and activism across domains: A multiple identities analysis. Journal of Social Issues,72(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12165.
Lundquist, J. H., & Lin, K. H. (2015). Is love (color) blind? The economy of race among gay and straight daters. Social Forces,93, 1423–1449. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov008.
MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology,51, 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.
Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research,23(2–3), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3.
McClendon, G. H. (2014). Social esteem and participation in contentious politics: A field experiment at an LGBT pride rally. American Journal of Political Science,58, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12076.
McConnell, E. A., Todd, N. R., Odahl-Ruan, C., & Shattell, M. (2016). Complicating counterspaces: Intersectionality and the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival. American Journal of Community Psychology,57(3–4), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12051.
Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology,56(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014587.
Mollborn, S., & Everett, B. (2015). Understanding the educational attainment of sexual minority women and men. Research in Social Stratification & Mobility,41, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.04.004.
Montgomery, S. A., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Privileged allies in lesbian and gay rights activism: Gender, generation, and resistance to heteronormativity. Journal of Social Issues,68(1), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01742.x.
Paceley, M. S., Oswald, R. F., & Hardesty, J. L. (2014). Factors associated with involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations: Proximity? Generativity? Minority stress? Social location? Journal of Homosexuality,61(10), 1481–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.928582.
Petrie, M. (2004). A research note on the determinants of protest participation: Examining socialization and biographical availability. Sociological Spectrum,24(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170490483523.
Poteat, V. P., Calzo, J. P., & Yoshikawa, H. (2018). Gay-Straight Alliance involvement and youths’ participation in civic engagement, advocacy, and awareness-raising. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,56, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.01.001.
Radke, H. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). Changing versus protecting the status quo: Why men and women engage in different types of action on behalf of women. Sex Roles,79(9–10), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0884-2.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Riggle, E. D., Mohr, J. J., Rostosky, S. S., Fingerhut, A. W., & Balsam, K. F. (2014). A multifactor lesbian, gay, and bisexual positive identity measure. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity,1, 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000057.
Rollins, J., & Hirsch, H. N. (2003). Sexual identities and political engagements: A queer survey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society,10, 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxg017.
Rye, B. J., & Meaney, G. J. (2009). Impact of a homonegativity awareness workshop on attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality,56, 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802551480.
Savin-Williams, R. C. (2017). Mostly straight: Sexual fluidity among men. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schaffner, B., & Senic, N. (2006). Rights or benefits? Explaining the sexual identity gap in American political behavior. Political Research Quarterly,59, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900111.
Schnabel, L. (2018). Sexual orientation and social attitudes. Socius,4, 2378023118769550. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118769550.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
Schussman, A., & Soule, S. A. (2005). Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces,84, 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0034.
Silva, T. J., & Whaley, R. B. (2018). Bud-sex, dude-sex, and heteroflexible men: The relationship between straight identification and social attitudes in a nationally representative sample of men with same-sex attractions or sexual practices. Sociological Perspectives,61(3), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417745024.
Silver, E. R., Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). Feminist identity in men. Sex Roles,80(5–6), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0932-6.
Silverschanz, P., Cortina, L. M., Konik, J., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: Incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles,58(3–4), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9329-7.
Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646.
Strolovitch, D. Z., Wong, J. S., & Proctor, A. (2017). A possessive investment in White heteropatriarchy? The 2016 election and the politics of race, gender, and sexuality. Politics, Groups, & Identities,5, 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1310659.
Swank, E. (2018a). Sexual identities and participation in liberal and conservative social movements. Social Science Research,74, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.04.002.
Swank, E. (2018b). Who voted for Hillary Clinton? Sexual identities, gender, and family influences. Journal of GLBT Family Studies,14, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1421335.
Swank, E. (2019). The political distinctiveness of gays and lesbians: Explaining protest actions across sexual identities. Politics, Groups, & Identities,7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1301823.
Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2011). Pathways to political activism among Americans who have same-sex sexual contact. Sexuality Research & Social Policy,8, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0034-5.
Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and race for sexual minorities who engage in gay and lesbian rights activism. Sex Roles,68, 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0168-9.
Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2014). Religion and gay rights activism among social work students. In A. Dessel & R. Bolen (Eds.), Conservative Christian beliefs and sexual orientation in social work: Privilege, oppression, and the pursuit of human rights (pp. 61–80). Alexandria: CSWE Press.
Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2017). College students, sexualities identities, and participation in political marches. Sexuality Research & Social Policy,14, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0242-0.
Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2019). Explaining the sexuality gap in protest participation. Journal of Homosexuality,66, 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1406210.
Swank, E., Woodford, M. R., & Lim, C. (2013). Antecedents of pro-LGBT advocacy among sexual minority and heterosexual college students. Sexuality Research & Social Policy,10, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0136-3.
Swim, J. K., Ferguson, M. J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Avoiding stigma by association: Subtle prejudice against lesbians in the form of social distancing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,21(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2101_6.
Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tate, C. U. (2015). On the overuse and misuse of mediation analysis: It may be a matter of timing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,37(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1062380.
Taylor, V., Kimport, K., Van Dyke, N., & Andersen, E. A. (2009). Culture and mobilization: Tactical repertoires, same-sex weddings, and the impact on gay activism. American Sociological Review,74, 865–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400602.
Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2004). ‘“Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements’. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–292). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Techakesari, P., Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Louis, W. R., & Barlow, F. K. (2017). Supportive contact and LGBT collective action: The moderating role of membership in specific groups. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology,23(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000240.
Terriquez, V. (2015). Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Social Problems,62(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv010.
Tesdahl, E. A., & Speer, P. W. (2015). Organization-level predictors of sustained social movement participation. American Journal of Community Psychology,55, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9692-9.
Toomey, R. B., Ryan, C., Diaz, R. M., & Russell, S. T. (2018). Coping with sexual orientation-related minority stress. Journal of Homosexuality,65, 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1321888.
Ueno, K., Roach, T. A., & Peña-Talamantes, A. E. (2013). The dynamic association between sexual orientation and educational attainment. Advances in Life Course Research,18, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.002.
Van Dyke, N. (1998). Hotbeds of activism: Locations of student protest. Social Problems,45, 205–220.
Waldner, L. (2001). Lesbian and gay political activism: An analysis of variables predicting political participation. Research in Political Sociology,9, 59–81.
White, A. M. (2006). Racial and gender attitudes as predictors of feminist activism among self-identified African American feminists. Journal of Black Psychology,32, 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406292469.
Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J. S., & Anderson, N. B. (2016). Racial differences in physical and mental health. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335–351.
Woodford, M. R., Silverschanz, P., Swank, E., Scherrer, K. S., & Raiz, L. (2012). Predictors of heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward LGBT people. Journal of LGBT Youth,9, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2012.716697.
Worthen, M. G. (2019). A rainbow wave? LGBTQ liberal political perspectives during Trump’s presidency: An exploration of sexual, gender, and queer identity gaps. Sexuality Research & Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00393-1.
Worthen, M., Sharp, S. F., & Rodgers, F. R. (2012). Gay and lesbian individuals’ attitudes toward the death penalty. Criminal Justice Review,37, 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016812438390.
Worthington, R. L., Dillon, F. R., & Becker-Schutte, A. M. (2005). Development, reliability, and validity of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual knowledge and attitudes scale for Heterosexuals (LGB-KASH). Journal of Counseling Psychology,52, 104–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Eric Swank, Brittanie Atteberry-Ash, Simon Coulombe and Michael R. Woodford declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. It also has IRB approval from the University of Michigan.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swank, E., Atteberry-Ash, B., Coulombe, S. et al. Sexual Identities and Protesting Among College Students: Exploring Political Distinctiveness Mediation Factors. Soc Just Res 33, 352–378 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00346-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00346-4