Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Justice and Emotions

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sociological theories of justice emphasize (a) the level of discrepancy or congruence between shares of resources received relative to individuals’ perceptions of “just shares” and (b) the emotions aroused with either discrepancy or congruence. While these theories tend to have precision and elegance, they generally do not specify the full range of reference points that can be used to establish what is considered a “just share,” nor do they explore the complete array of emotions (and targets of these emotions) aroused during justice evaluations. In this article, an effort is made to expand the conception of reference points elicited in justice evaluations, the structural processes that determine the specific emotions that will be aroused during justice evaluations, and the psychodynamics that mediate among reference points, structural processes, emotional arousal, and targeting of emotional reactions onto self, others, and social structures. The article concludes with some hypotheses about the emotions aroused and targeted during justice evaluations employing varying reference points and arising under specific structural conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 119–146). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Webster, M. (2006). Expectations, status and behavior. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1994). The social context of opportunities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). Fair refusal by Capuchin monkeys. Nature, 148, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195–214). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1982). Perceiving justice; An attributional perspective. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 119–160). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, R. (1996). The science of emotion: Research and tradition in the psychology of emotions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition, 31, 187–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C. (1969). The J-curve of rising expectations and declining satisfaction as a cause of some great revolutions and contained rebellions. In H. D. Graham & T. R. Gurr (Eds.), The history of violence in America (pp. 690–739). New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. (1947 [1912]). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.

  • Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory: Two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. B. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science 171, 345–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1976). Resource theory and social exchange. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99–131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa U. G., Converse J., Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, E. B. (Eds.) (1993). Resource theory: Explorations and applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garret, J., & Libby, W. L. (1973). Role of intentionality in mediating responses to inequity in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental intepretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 437–470). New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1987). The influence of misattribution on reactions to inequity: Towards a further understanding of inequity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary sociological social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotional responses: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78, 269–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine & J. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives in social psychology (pp. 257–80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A., Thompson, E., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Power and equity: What counts in explaining exchange outcomes? Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 100–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms, revised edition. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, J. A., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2002). Status, emotions, and the development of solidarity in stratified task groups. Advances in Group Processes, 18, 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1993). Choice and emotion in comparison theory. Rationality and Society, 5, 231–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2001a). Formal theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 37–69). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2001b). Comparison theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 669–98). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2006). The theory of comparison processes. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Lamm, H., Kayser, E., & Schwinger, T. (1982). Justice norms and other determinants of allocation and negotiation behavior. In M. Irle (Ed.), Decision making: Social psychological and socio-economic analyses (pp. 359–410). New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., Kayser, E., & Schanz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (1987). Comparison of dependence and punitive forms of power. Social Forces, 66, 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multi-level distributive justice theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 822–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. P, & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1967 [1924]). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. New York: Norton.

  • Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 127–166). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In Folger R. (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25–62). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. (2000). The formation of status beliefs: Improving status construction theory. Advances in group processes, 17, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. (2006a). Status construction theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary sociological social psychological theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. (2006b). Status and emotion from an expectation states theory. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.

  • Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 95–126). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2002). Face-to-face: Toward a theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2006). Sociological psychoanalytic theories of emotion. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.

  • Utne, M. K., & Kidd, R. F. (1984). Equity and attribution. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 63–94). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G, & Turner, J. H. (1998). Expectation states theory. The structure of sociological theory (6th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A., Marks, G., & Jones, G. A. (1981). Luck versus effort attributions: Effect on reward allocations to self and other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. Jr., & Walker, H. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. Advances in Group Processes, 1, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. Jr. (2006). Legitimacy theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychology theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan H. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, J.H. Justice and Emotions. Soc Just Res 20, 288–311 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0043-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0043-y

Keywords

Navigation