Abstract
The physical process constraining the most significant quasi-periodicity in cosmogenic radionuclide records and in reconstructed sunspot-number records, the sharply-defined ≈ 210-yr de Vries cycle, is unknown. It is found here to coincide within the measurement errors with the beat of the Schwabe cycle’s ≈ 1/10.0 yr Fourier-spectrum secondary frequency-peak, with the cycle’s ≈ 1/10.5-yr central Fourier peak which is also its autocorrelation period. The lesser-known, but just as significant de Vries companion-oscillation of ≈ 230-yr coincides with the beat of the ≈ 1/11.0 yr main frequency peak with the ≈ 1/10.5 yr period. In the classical solar-dynamo mode-typology based on symmetries, the three beating quasi-decadal periods would correspond to the dipole mode (≈ 11.0 yr), the quadrupole mode (putatively ≈ 10.0 yr in historical sunspot data), and the composite “mixed-parity” mode (≈ 10.5 yr). The secondary beat of the observed ≈ 210-yr and ≈ 230-yr bicentennial oscillations yields a 2310 yr period. This value is consistent with the prominent Hallstatt cycle’s estimated length of 2300 yr in the Holocene.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No new data are used in this paper.
References
Ahluwalia, H.S., Ygbuhay, R.C.: 2016, Salient features of the new sunspot number time series. Solar Phys. 291(12), 3807. DOI.
Arlt, R.: 2009, The butterfly diagram in the eighteenth century. Solar Phys. 255, 143. DOI.
Baidolda, F.: 2017, Search for Planetary Influences on Solar Activity. Prof. J. Laskar. Ph. D. thesis, advisor. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01690207.
Beer, J., Tobias, S.M., Weiss, N.O.: 2018, On long-term modulation of the Sun’s magnetic cycle. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473, 1596. DOI.
Berger, W.: 2012, Hans E. Suess (1909 – 1993): radiocarbon, Sun and climate pioneer. Institution, Technical Report, 13, University of California, (San Diego), Scripps https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bc4c0w7.
Carrasco, V.M.S., Aparicio, A.J.P., Vaquero, J.M., Gallego, M.C.: 2016, The new sunspot-number index and solar-cycle characteristics. Solar Phys. 291(9), 3045. DOI.
Cohen, T.J., Lintz, P.R.: 1974, Long term periodicities in the sunspot cycle. Nature 250, 398. DOI.
Cole, T.W.: 1973, Periodicities in solar activity. Solar Phys. 30, 103. DOI.
Damon, P.E., Peristykh, A.N.: 2000, Radiocarbon calibration and application to geophysics, solar physics, and astrophysics. Radiocarbon 42(1), 137. DOI.
Damon, P.E., Sonett, C.P.: 1991, Solar and terrestrial components of the atmospheric 14 C variation spectrum. In: Sonett, G.P., Giampapa, M.S., Matthews, M.S. (eds.) The Sun in Time, University of Arizona Space Science Series 360.
De Vries, H.: 1958, Variation in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on Earth. Koninkl. Nederlandse Akad. Wetensch. Proc., Ser. B 61(2), 94.
Dergachev, V.A.: 2004, Manifestation of the long-term solar cyclicity in climate archives over 10 millennia. In: Stepanov, A.V., Benevolenskaya, E.E., Kosovichev, A.G. (eds.) Multi-Wavelength Investigations of Solar Activity. Proceedings of IAU Symposium S223, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 14–19, 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 699.
Donahue, R.A., Baliunas, S.L.: 1992, Periodogram analysis of 240 years of sunspot records. Solar Phys. 141(1), 181. DOI.
Feynman, J., Ruzmaikin, A.: 2014, The Centennial Gleissberg Cycle and its association with extended minima. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 6027. DOI.
Fritz, H.: 1881, Das Polarlicht, Brockhaus, Leipzig, 162.
Fyodorov, M.V., Klimenko, V.V., Dovgalyuk, V.V.: 1996, Sunspot minima dates: a secular forecast. Solar Phys. 165, 193. DOI.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., Reichmann, E.J.: 2002, Group sunspot numbers: sunspot cycle characteristics. Solar Phys. 211, 357. DOI.
Houtermans, J.C.: 1971, Geophysical interpretations of Bristlecone pine radiocarbon measurements using a method of Fourier analysis of unequally spaced data. Dissertation (Ph. D. thesis), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Jayalekshmi, G.L., Prince, P.R.: 2014, Study of periodicities in relative sunspot numbers and disturbance storm time indices using wavelet techniques. Indian J. Phys. 88(12), 1221.
Kern, A.K., Harzhauser, M., Piller, W.E., Mandic, O., Soliman, A.: 2012, Strong evidence for the influence of solar cycles on a Late Miocene lake system revealed by biotic and abiotic proxies. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 329–330, 124. DOI.
Knudsen, M.F., Riisager, P., Jacobsen, B.H., Muscheler, R., Snowball, I., Seidenkrantz, M.-S.: 2009, Taking the pulse of the Sun during the Holocene by joint analysis of 14C and 10Be. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(16), L16701. DOI.
Komitov, B.P.: 1997, Schove’s series, centurial and supercenturial variations of solar activity. Bulg. Geoph. J. 23, 69.
Komitov, B.P., Kaftan, V.I.: 2003, Solar activity variations for the last millennia. Will the next long-period solar minimum be formed? Geomagn. Aeron. 43(5), 553.
Kremliovsky, M.N.: 1994, Can we understand time scales of solar activity? Solar Phys. 151(2), 351.
Kuklin, G.V.: 1976, Cyclical and secular variations of solar activity. In: Bumba, V., Kleczek, J. (eds.) Proceedings of IAU Symposium No 71, Prague, Tchechoslovakia, 25–29 August 1975. Reidel, Dordrecht, 147.
Le Mouël, J.L., Lopes, F., Courtillot, V.: 2017, Identification of Gleissberg cycles and a rising trend in a 315-year-long series of sunspot numbers. Solar Phys. 292(3), 43. DOI.
Li, T.-H.: 2014, Time Series with Mixed Spectra, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton/London, 558. www.crcpress.com.
Li, K.J., Gao, P.X., Su, T.W.: 2005, The Schwabe and Gleissberg periods in the Wolf sunspot numbers and the group sunspot numbers. Solar Phys. 229(1), 181. DOI.
Lomb, N.R.: 2013, The sunspot cycle revisited. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 440(1), 012042. DOI.
Ma, L.H., Vaquero, J.M.: 2009, Is the Suess cycle present in historical naked-eye observations of sunspots? New Astron. 14(3), 307. DOI.
McCracken, K., Beer, J., Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.: 2013, A phenomenological study of the cosmic ray variations over the past 9400 years, and their implications regarding solar activity and the solar dynamo. Solar Phys. 286(2), 609. DOI.
Mudelsee, M.: 2010, Climate Time Series Analysis, 1st edn. Springer, Cham 195.
Nesme-Ribes, E., Sokoloff, D.D., Ribes, J.C., Kremliovsky, M.: 1994, The Maunder minimum and the solar dynamo. In: Nesme-Ribes, E. (ed.) The Solar Engine and Its Influence on Terrestrial Atmosphere and Climate, NATO ASI Series 25, Springer, Berlin, 527.
Nordemann, D.J.R., Trivedi, N.B.: 1992, Sunspot number time series: exponential fitting and periodicities. Solar Phys. 142(2), 411. DOI.
Obridko, V.N., Pipin, V.V., Sokoloff, D., Shibalova, A.S.: 2021, Solar large-scale magnetic field and cycle patterns in solar dynamo. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 504(4), 4990. DOI.
Otaola, J.A., Zenteno, G.: 1983, On the existence of long-term periodicities in solar activity. Solar Phys. 89(1), 209. DOI.
Pearson, G., Stuiver, M.: 1986, High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 bc. Radiocarbon 28(2B), 839. DOI.
Peristykh, A.N., Damon, P.E.: 2003, Persistence of the Gleissberg 88-year solar cycle over the last ≈ 12,000 years: evidence from cosmogenic isotopes. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A1), 1003. DOI.
Quiroga-Lombard, C.S., Balenzuela, P., Braun, H., Chialvo, D.B.: 2010, A simple conceptual model to interpret the 100 000 years dynamics of paleo-climate records. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 17(5), 585. DOI.
Rabin, D., Wilson, R.M., Moore, R.L.: 1986, Bimodality of the solar cycle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13(4), 352. DOI.
Rangarajan, G.K.: 1998, Sunspot variability and an attempt to predict solar cycle 23 by adaptive filtering. Earth Planets Space 50, 9.1.
Raynaud, R., Tobias, S.M.: 2016, Convective dynamo action in a spherical shell: symmetries and modulation. J. Fluid Mech. 799, R6. DOI.
Reimer, P.J., et al.: 2020, The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0 – 55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4), 725. DOI. Time series and curves at www.intcal.org.
Richard, J.-G.: 2020, RecursiveiInteger sequences, detected in solar-cycle periodicities measured in numbers of rigid rotations of the Sun. Solar Phys. 295(6), 78. DOI.
Rozelot, J.P.: 1994, On the stability of the 11-year solar cycle period (and a few others). Solar Phys. 149(1), 149. DOI.
Sanderson, T.R., Appourchaux, T., Hoeksema, J.T., Harvey, K.L.: 2003, Observations of the Sun’s magnetic field during the recent solar maximum. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A1), 1035. DOI.
Schove, D.J.: 1955, The sunspot cycle 649 BC to 2000 AD. J. Geophys. Res. 60(2), 127. DOI.
Schwabe, H.S.: 1844, Sonnenbeobachtungen im Jahre 1843. Von Herrn Hofrath Schwabe in Dessau. Astron. Nachr. 21(15), 233.
Solanki, S.K., Usoskin, I.G., Kromer, B., Schüssler, M., Beer, J.: 2004, Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature 431, 1084. DOI.
Sonett, C.P.: 1990, Atmospheric 14 C variations: a Bayesian prospect. In: Fougère, P.F. (ed.) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 143.
Sonett, C.P., Finney, S.A., Berger, A.: 1990, The spectrum of radiocarbon: discussion. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 330(1615), 413. DOI.
Stuiver, M., Pearson, G.: 1986, High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950-500 BC. Radiocarbon 28(2B), 805. DOI.
Suess, H.E.: 1980, The radiocarbon record in tree rings of the last 8000 years. Radiocarbon 22(2), 200.
Tan, B.: 2011, Multi-timescale solar cycles and the possible implications. Astrophys. Space Sci. 332(1), 65. DOI.
Thomson, D.J.: 1990, Time series analysis of Holocene climate data. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 330(1615), 601. DOI.
Tlatov, A.G.: 2015, The change of the solar cyclicity mode. Adv. Space Res. 55(3), 851. DOI.
Torregrosa Alberola, A.: 2017, Analysis del ciclo de actividad solar y su influencia en la Tierra. Final year degree project work (advisor: T. Roca Cortès), Astrophysics Dept., Universidad de la Laguna (ULL), Tenerife, Spain. https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/915/4276/Analisis+del+ciclo+de+actividad+solar+y+su+influencia+en+la+Tierra.pdf?sequence=1.
Usoskin, I.G., Hulot, G., Gallet, Y., Roth, R., Licht, A., Joos, F., Kovaltsov, G.A., Thébault, E., Khokhlov, A.: 2014, Evidence for distinct modes of solar activity. Astron. Astrophys. 562, L10. DOI.
Usoskin, I.G., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Hofer, B., Kovaltsov, G.A., Wacker, L., Brehm, N., Kromer, B.: 2021, Solar cyclic activity over the last millennium reconstructed from annual 14C data. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A141. DOI.
Vecchio, A., Lepreti, F., Laurenza, M., Alberti, T., Carbone, V.: 2017, Connection between solar activity cycles and grand minima generation. Astron. Astrophys. 599, A58. DOI.
Weiss, N.O., Tobias, S.M.: 2016, Supermodulation of the Sun’s magnetic activity: the effects of symmetry changes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456(3), 2654. DOI.
Weiss, N.O., Knobloch, E., Tobias, S.M.: 1998, Modulation and symmetry changes in stellar dynamos. In: Chossat, P., et al. (eds.) Dynamo and Dynamics: A Mathematical Challenge, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht 381.
Wolf, R.: 1859, Schreiben des Herrn Professor Wolf an den Herausgeber. Astron. Nachr. 50(21), 325.
Yin, Z.Q., Ma, L.H., Han, Y.B., Han, Y.G.: 2007, Long-term variations of solar activity. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52(20), 2737. DOI.
Zhu, F.R., Jia, H.Y.: 2018, Lomb–Scargle periodogram analysis of the periods around 5.5 year and 11 year in the international sunspot numbers. Astrophys. Space Sci. 363(7), 138. DOI.
Acknowledgments
The idea of a paper about the de Vries cycle and decadal dynamo modes was sparked by conversations with Dr. A. Ruzmaikin and Prof. M. Schüssler at Space Climate 7 Symposium in Canton Orford (Canada) in July 2019. The author thanks Prof. D. D. Sokoloff and Prof. I. G. Usoskin for their personal communications. He is indebted to Dr. P. Reimer for her advice on the IntCal20 record. The author is grateful to Dr. F.-G. Carpentier and to Dr. I. Rivals for generously communicating their separate analyses of several IntCal20 time series. He is thankful to Dr. F.-G. Carpentier for his advice, and to Dr. A. Strugarek for an interesting conversation on dynamo symmetries. The author thanks an anonymous reviewer for his/her expert reading and assessment. This paper is dedicated to the memories of three late pioneers of the solar-beat conjecture: Dr. W. Berger, Dr. J. Feynman, and Dr. E. Nesme-Ribes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jean-Guillaume RICHARD is the sole author of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
The author declares to have no conflict of interest.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Centennial Oscillation in Solar Activity: Spectral estimates
Appendix: Centennial Oscillation in Solar Activity: Spectral estimates
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Richard, JG. A Possible Connection between the de Vries Cycle and the Solar Dynamo. Sol Phys 297, 124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02052-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02052-y