Abstract
There has been a recent upsurge of interest in self-reported measures of wellbeing by official statisticians and by researchers in the social sciences. This paper considers data from a wellbeing supplement to the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), which parsed the previous day into episodes. Respondents provided ratings of five experiential wellbeing adjectives (happiness, stress, tiredness, sadness, and pain) for each of three randomly selected episodes. Because the ATUS wellbeing module has not received very much attention, in this paper we provide the reader with details about the features of these data and our approach to analyzing the data (e.g., weighting considerations), and then illustrate the applicability of these data to current issues. Specifically, we examine the association of age and income with all of the experiential wellbeing adjective in the ATUS. Results from the ATUS wellbeing module were broadly consistent with earlier findings on age, but did not confirm all earlier findings between income and wellbeing. We conclude that the ATUS, with its measurement of time use, specific activities, and hedonic experience in a nationally representative survey, offers a unique opportunity to incorporate time use into the burgeoning field of wellbeing research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baltes, P. B. (2003). Extending longevity: Dignity gain-or dignity drain? MaxPlanck Research, 3, 14–19.
Baum, A., Garofalo, J., & Yali, A. (1999). Socioeconomic status and chronic stress: Does stress account for SES effects on health? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 131–144.
Bühler, C. (1935). The curve of life as studied in biographies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(4), 405–409.
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655.
Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.
Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. (2014). Validation of a brief yesterday measure of hedonic well-being and daily activities: Comparison with the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 115, 907–917.
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.
Clark, A. E., Kristensen, N., & Westergard-Nielsen, N. (2009). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 519–527.
Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1992). Psychological stress and the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 645–646.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.
DeVries, M. (1987). Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Nervious and Mental Disease, 175, 509–513.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.
Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A. A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99, 269–283.
Dolan, P., & Kudrna, L. (2015). More years, less yawns: Fresh evidence on tiredness by age and other factors. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(4), 576–580.
Dolan, P., Kudrna, L., & Stone, A. (2016). The measure matters: An investigation of evaluative and experience-based measures of wellbeing in time use data. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8.
English, T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2014). Emotional experience in the mornings and the evenings: Consideration of age differences in specific emotions by time of day. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 185.
Flood, S. M., & Genadek, K. R. (2016). Time for each other: Work and family constraints among couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 142–164.
Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 79–106.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1968). Adjustments and reorientation in the course of the life span. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging (pp. 77–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gana, K., Bailly, N., Saada, Y., Joulain, M., & Alaphilippe, D. (2013). Does life satisfaction change in old age: Results from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 540–552.
Harter, J. K., & Gurley, V. F. (2008). Measuring health in the United States. APS Observer, 21, 23–26.
Junghaenel, D. U., Christodoulou, C., Lai, J.-S., & Stone, A. A. (2011). Demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) initiative. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 71(3), 117–123.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16489–16493.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910.
Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being: National time accounting: the currency of life (NBER Working Paper No. c5053). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012a). The lot of the unemployed: A time use perspective. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 765–794.
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012b). Time use, emotional well-being, and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. American Economic Review, 102, 594–599.
Krueger, A. B., & Stone, A. A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. The Lancet, 371(9623), 1519–1525.
Kushlev, K., Dunn, E. W., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 483–489.
Lee, Y., Hofferth, S. L., Flood, S. M., & Fisher, K. (2016). Reliability, validity, and variability of the subjective well-being questions in the 2010 American time use survey. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1355–1373.
Luhmann, M., Schimmack, U., & Eid, M. (2011). Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 186–197.
Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.
McFarland, C., Ross, M., & DeCourville, N. (1989). Women’s theories of menstruation and biases in recall of menstrual symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 522–531.
O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and policy. London: Legatum Limited.
OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pampel, F. C., Krueger, P. M., & Denney, J. T. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annual review of sociology, 36, 349–370.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12, 1181–1187.
Santiago, C. D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Stump, J. (2011). Socioeconomic status, neighborhood disadvantage, and poverty-related stress: Prospective effects on psychological syndromes among diverse low-income families. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(2), 218–230.
Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(2), 135–144.
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.
Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2014). Distinguishing between frequency and intensity of health-related symptoms from diary assessments. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77(3), 205–212.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports. How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York: Guilford.
Shelley, K. J. (2005). Developing the American time use survey activity classification system. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 3–15.
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet, 385, 640–648.
Steptoe, A., & Kivimaki, M. (2012). Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 9(6), 360–370.
Steptoe, A., Wardle, J., & Marmot, M. (2005). Positive affect and health-related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 6508–6512.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? The American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP). http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/documents.htm
Stone, A. A., & Mackie, C. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 9985–9990.
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants for the National Institute on Aging and the National Bureau of Economic Research, 5R01AG040629, P01AG05842, and 5R01AG042407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AAS and AD are Senior Scientists with the Gallup Organization.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, A.A., Schneider, S., Krueger, A. et al. Experiential Wellbeing Data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with Other Methods and Analytic Illustrations with Age and Income. Soc Indic Res 136, 359–378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1532-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1532-x