Skip to main content
Log in

Costs and Economies of Scale at Not-for-Profit Organizations: The Case of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Barcelos Between 2002 and 2013

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we intend to evaluate the triangular sustainability of not-for-profit organizations, putting a special emphasis on the study of economies of scale. After a collection of raw data from the historical archives of the institution (a ‘Santa Casa da Misericordia de Barcelos’), we constructed a panel database. Using this database, we estimated cobb-douglas costs functions, by applying fixed and random effects. We found that Portuguese institutions as the one here studied (belonging to the Portuguese Social Economy and as a representative of the Holy Houses of Mercy) exhibit economies of scale, which ask for a renewed perspective of the sector by the regulating entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is important to notice that, as statistically requested, the main independent variable (lutente) is not highly correlated with the input variables (coefficients lower than 0.70) neither with the prices of input (Amsler et al. 2014). If there were coefficients higher than 0.70 there could appear problems of endogeneity. For confirming the absence of problems of endogeneity among the number of users, the input variables, and the prices of inputs we ran Hausman tests considering as instruments the product between inputs and their prices; and we also got p values lower than 1 % (null hypothesis related to the statistically significance of the used instruments).

References

  • Abraham, A. (2004, July 4–6). A model of financial performance analysis adapted for nonprofit organizations. Paper presented at the AFAANZ 2004 conference, Alice Springs, Australia.

  • Albonico, A., Kalyvitis, S., & Pappa, E. (2014). Capital maintenance and depreciation over the business cycle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 39, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler, C., Prokhorov, A., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Endogeneity in Stochastic Frontier Models. BA working paper no: BAWP-2015-01. Business Analytics Working Paper Series, University of Sydney.

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa Leão, J. (1868). Analyse do Orçamento ou A Questão Financeira ResolvidaSystema de Economias e Reformas por meio das quaes se extinguirá o deficit sendo igualada a receita e a despeza no orçamento para o anno económico de 1869 a 1870 com pequeno sacrifício para todos com notável melhoramento de muitos serviços e sem prejuízo de nenhum. Porto: Typographia de António José da Silva Teixeira.

  • Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucinha, M., Ribeiro, N., & Weyman-Jones, T. (2010). Uma avaliação da eficiência dos bancos portugueses. In. Relatório de Estabilidade Financeira | Maio 2010 (pp. 125–145). Lisbon: Departamento de Estudos Económicos do Banco de Portugal.

  • Boyer, R. (2005). Coherence, diversity and evolution of capitalisms: The institutional complementarity hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies Working Paper. Harvard University.

  • Bryson, J. M., Gibbons, M. J., & Shaye, G. (2001). Enterprise schemes for nonprofit survival, growth, and effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramelo, M. D. T. A. (2013). Impacto da crise nas IPSS do Distrito de Coimbra. Unpublished master thesis in sociology. University of Coimbra, Portugal.

  • Carneiro, M. (2006). A Economia Social em Portugal. In M. Pérez de Uralde & M. R. Rubio (Eds.), La Economía Social en Iberoamérica—un Acercamiento a su Realidad (pp. 233–255). Valencia: Fundación Iberoamericana de la Economía Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreira C. (1999). Economias de escala e de gama nos hospitais públicos Portugueses: Uma aplicação da função de custo variável translog. Discussion Paper No. 1. Portugal: University of Coimbra, Grupo de Estudos Monetários e Financeiros.

  • Chandler, Alfred Dupont. (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colonna, J. T., & Mourão, P. R. (2011). Factores de Localización de las Cofradías Religiosas en Actividad: una Investigación a Orillas del Atlántico y el Pacífico. Scripta Nova – revista de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales, 12, 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, R. (2005). Complementarity and institutional change: How useful a concept? Discussion paper SP II 2005-21. Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.

  • Direção-Geral da Saúde. (2014). Portugal Idade Maior em Números—2014: A Saúde da População Portuguesa com 65 ou mais anos de idade. Lisboa.

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel, M. J. (1957). The measurement of production efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part III, 120(3), 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, R. C., Sokolowski, S. W., Hairel, E. M., & Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Portuguese nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. Johns Hopkins University.

  • Greene, W. H. (2008). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In H. O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (pp. 92–229). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Hartarska, V., Shen, X., & Mersland, R. (2013). Scale economies and input price elasticities in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(1), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlin, H., & Pazirandeh, A. (2012). Nonprofit organizations shaping the market of supplies. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hespanha, P., Ferreira, S., & Pacheco, V. (2013). O Estado Social, crise e reformas. In: Relatório Preliminar do Observatório das Crises e Alternativas—Anatomia da crise: identificar os problemas para construir as alternativas, pp. 161–242.

  • Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P. (INE) & Cooperativa António Sérgio para a Economia Social, CIPRL (CASES). (2013). Conta Satélite da Economia Social 2010.

  • Jones, K. R., & Mucha, L. (2014). Sustainability Assessment and reporting for nonprofit organizations: Accountability “for the Public Good”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1465–1482.

  • Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H., & Zahradnik, A. G. (2012). Online media, market orientation, and financial performance in nonprofits. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24(1), 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2014). Defining the content of sustainability reports in nonprofit organizations: do stakeholders really matter? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(1), 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, W. L. (2013). Análise de custos: utilizado em ciências contábeis e administração. Paraná: Gráfica Vera Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. (2002). Economia da Empresa (2nd ed.). Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, V. (2001). The state of evaluation tools and systems for nonprofit organizations. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 2001(31), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penteado, P. (2004). A Investigação em sistemas de arquivo organizacionais: algumas reflexões sobre o caso das Misericórdias de Portugal. In Homenagem ao Professor Doutor José Marques (pp. 141–163). University of Porto.

  • Ribeiro, M. (2006). Economia da escala e de gama e os efeitos da concentração na eficiência bancária. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

  • Schmidt, P., & Lovell, C. K. (1979). Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers. Journal of econometrics, 9(3), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharir, M., & Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizutani, S., & Suzuki, W. (2002). The quality and efficiency of at-home long-term care in Japan: Evidence from micro-level data. Discussion paper series No. 18. Economic and Social Research Institute, Tokyo.

  • Sousa, S. et al. (2012). As Instituições Particulares de Solidariedade Social num contexto de crise económica. Lisbon, Portugal: IPI-consulting network Portugal, Confederação Nacional de Instituições de Solidariedade (CNIS) & Millennium BCP Foundation.

  • União das Misericórdias Portuguesas (2012). Retrieved July 26, 2012, from www.ump.pt.

  • Valentinov, V. (2008). The economics of nonprofit organization: In search of an integrative theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 17(3), 745–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., McDonald, R. E., & Mort, G. S. (2010). Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetman, R. J. (2007). Borrowing and Debt. In D. R. Young (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 243–268). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Mourão.

Additional information

The authors recognize the attention and the suggestions of two anonymous Reviewers on a previous version of this research. The authors are also indebted to the participants of the Sessions at which a previous version of this research had been discussed (2015 Academic Conference ‘Social and Sustainable Finance and Impact Investing’, Oxford, 23rd–24th April and 2015 Academic Conference ‘The European Year for Development’, UTAD/Vila Real, 4th May 2015). Remaining errors are authors’ exclusive ones.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Spearman correlation matrix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mourão, P., Enes, C. Costs and Economies of Scale at Not-for-Profit Organizations: The Case of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Barcelos Between 2002 and 2013. Soc Indic Res 132, 821–840 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1315-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1315-4

Keywords

Navigation