Abstract
The Chinese government conducted its first time use survey of the activities of Chinese individuals in 2008. Activities were classified into three broad types, maintenance activities, subsistence activities and leisure activities. Time use patterns were defined by an individuals’ time spent on maintenance, subsistence and leisure activities each day. We analyzed the time use patterns of different population segments, such as gender, region, age, employment status, and income. Rural residents spend 2 h per day more on SA than urban residents. Five of the employment status categories; migrant workers, full-time students, retirees, the unemployed, and Home-makers, each have unique time schedules. Moreover, time use patterns vary greatly between the different age groups and different income levels. The relationships between the time spent on maintenance, subsistence, and leisure activities were analyzed. Time spent on subsistence activities each day were negatively correlated with time spent on maintenance and leisure activities. The time spent on maintenance activities was positively correlated with the time spent on leisure activities. The ratio of time spent on maintenance, subsistence and leisure activities in China is compared with that in Japan, America and New Zealand. A new term, Time Structure, was coined to describe the ratio of individual time spent on maintenance, subsistence and leisure activities. The time structure in China is 60:24:16 and differs from the structures found in the other countries examined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2009). A summary of trends in American time allocation, 1965–2005. Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 57–64. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9362-0.
Bhat, C. R., & Koppelman, F. S. (1993). A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation. Transportation Research, 27A(6), 433–446. doi:10.1016/0965-8564(93)90050-U.
Bhat, C. R., & Misra, R. (1999). Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekend. Transportation, 26(2), 193–209. doi:10.1023/A:1005192230485.
Bittman, M. (1993). Australians’ changing use of time: 1974–1987. Social Indicators Research, 30(2–3), 91–108. doi:10.1007/BF01078721.
Bureau of Labor Statistics of U.S (BLS). (2008). Time use survey, 2008, America. http://stats.bls.gov/tus/.
Eglite, P., & Zarins, I. (1993). Changes of time use of the town population in Latvia. Social Indicators Research, 30(2–3), 109–119. doi:10.1007/BF01078722.
Fisher, K., & Robinson, J. (2009). Average weekly time spent in 30 basic activities across 17 countries. Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 249–254. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9372-y.
International Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2002). world competitiveness yearbook 2002, China Finacial & Economic publishing House. (in Chinese).
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC). (2006). Results on time use for Japan. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/shakai/2006/jikan-a/zenkoku/zenkoku.htm.
National Bureau of statistics of China (NBSC). (2008). China time use survey report 2008, National Bureau of Statistics. (in Chinese). http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/qtsj/2008sjlydczlhb/index.htm.
Rooijen-Horsten, M. V., Gringhuis, G., & Milot, R. (2004). Time use changes in the Netherlands: The analytical strength of a time-use module, Discussion paper 04010, Statistics Netherlands. http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/5337D49D-389F-4F38-88F8-F9A70BD9E201/0/discussionpaper04010.pdf.
Statistics New Zealand. (1999). Time use statistics 1999. http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/pasfull/pasfull.nsf/web/Standard+Tables+Time+Use+Statistics+1999+Downloadable+free+items+(Excel+or+PDF+files))?open.
Sturgis, P., & Jackson, J. (2003a). Preliminary analysis of the UK 2000 time use survey for the department for culture, media and sport. Examining participation in sporting and cultural activities. http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/research/Phase1Analyses.pdf.
Zhao, Y. Y., & Li, J. P. (2000). The assessment, analysis and forecast of the China’s quality of life. Management World, (3), 32–40 (in Chinese).
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41071005). We are very grateful to National Bureau of Statistics of China for their help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hui-fen, Z., Zhen-shan, L., Dong-qian, X. et al. Time Use Patterns Between Maintenance, Subsistence and Leisure Activities: A Case Study in China. Soc Indic Res 105, 121–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9768-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9768-3