Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Who are the Supporters of Croatian Membership in the European Union and NATO? Predictive Value of Personal and National Well-Being

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like many other Central and Eastern European countries Croatia has passed through substantial political changes and transition processes from state to liberal market economy in the last two decades. The next important step is accession to EU and NATO, and public opinion about joining these associations is divided. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive value of subjective well-being measures in explaining attitudes of Croatian citizens toward accession to NATO and European Union. In particular, the prognostic utility of SWB is tested over and above usefulness of basic socio-demographic variables in explaining those political opinions. The research was conducted on a huge and representative sample (N = 4,000) of Croatian citizens in the spring of 2009. As a measure of subjective well-being, Croatian version of International Well-Being Index (IWI; Cummins in International Wellbeing Index, Version 2 [online]. Available from: http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/inter_wellbeing/Index-CoreItemsDraft2.doc, 2002) was used. IWI includes National and Personal Well-Being scales where each scale consists of several personal or national well-being domains. Socio-demographic variables used in this survey were gender, age, and level of education. Hierarchical logistic regression was applied to test the unique contribution of National and Personal well-being domains in predicting attitudes toward accession. The results show that National well-being index is useful in predicting attitudes toward accession of Croatia to EU and NATO, and has an even higher predictive value than basic socio-demographic variables. National well-being domains that significantly improve prediction were satisfaction with government and satisfaction with national economic situation. Higher satisfaction with national government is related to support of accession to both alliances, whereas higher satisfaction with national economy is associated solely with supporting the EU membership. The personal well-being index and belonging domains were not useful in this political attitude prediction. Possible theoretical explanation of observed relations between NWI and political opinion were further discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quality of life is a multidimensional construct that includes social indicators, subjective well-being measures, and diverse economic indicators (Diener and Suh 1997a, b; Veenhoven 2000).

References

  • Anderson, C. J. (1995). Economic uncertainty and European solidarity revisited: Trends in public support for European integration. In C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (Eds.), The state of the European Union, Vol 3: Building a European Policy?. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Reichert, S. (1996). Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagić, D., & Šalinović, A. (2007). Analiza troškova i koristi kao čimbenik potpore građana ulasku Hrvatske u Europsku uniju. [Cost-benefit analyse as element of public support to accession of Croatia to EU]. In K. Ott (Ed.), Pridruživanje Hrvatske Europskoj uniji, 4. svezak: Izazovi sudjelovanja, [Accession of Croatia to EU: Challenges, Inclusion] (pp. 155–180). Zagreb: Institut za javne financije i Zaklada Friedrich Ebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplanova, A., Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2004). Eastern European attitudes to integration with Western Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order Chaos. Social Indicators Research, 36, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2002). International Wellbeing Index, Version 2 [online]. Available from: http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/inter_wellbeing/Index-CoreItemsDraft2.doc.

  • Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(6), 633–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1997a). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 8, pp. 304–324). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997b). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17, 304–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehin, P. (2001). Determinants of public support for EU membership: Data from the Baltic countries. European Journal of Political Research, 40, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, R. C., & Dalton, R. J. (1993). Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, T., Whelan, C. T., & Maitre, B. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Income inequalities and deprivation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M. (1998). Interests and integration. Market liberalization, public opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M., & Palmer, H. D. (1995). Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 27(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M., & Whitten, G. D. (1997). Economic conditions, economic perceptions, and public support for European integration. Political Behavior, 19(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Land, K., Michalos, A., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Witter, R. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 947–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J., & Lavery, J. (1995). Subjective well-being and age. Social Indicators Research, 34, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2000). Referendums on European integration. Do institutions matter in the voter’s decision? Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinova, T. (2000). East European public support for NATO membership: Fears and aspirations. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee-Ryan, F. M., Song, Z., Wamberg, C. R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G., & Weitsman, P. (1996). The punishment trap: Integration referendums as popularity contests’. Comparative Political Studies, 28, 582–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness. Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoko, B. (2006). Percepcija Europske unije u hrvatskoj javnosti [Perception of the European Union in the Croatian public]. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva [Annals of the Croatian Political Science Association] 3(1), 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tverdova, Y. V., & Anderson, C. J. (2003). Choosing the West? Referendum choices on EU membership in east-central Europe. Electoral Studies, 23(2), 158–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S., Korosteleva, J., & Allison, R. (2006). NATO: The view from the East. European Security, 15(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia

    Toni Babarović & Josip Burušić

  2. SUVAG Polyclinic for the Rehabilitation of Listening and Speech, Zagreb, Croatia

    Lidija Čilić Burušić

Authors
  1. Toni Babarović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lidija Čilić Burušić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Josip Burušić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Babarović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babarović, T., Burušić, L.Č. & Burušić, J. Who are the Supporters of Croatian Membership in the European Union and NATO? Predictive Value of Personal and National Well-Being. Soc Indic Res 102, 71–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9723-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9723-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation