Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individual quality of life: can it be accounted for by psychological or subjective well-being?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is ongoing discussion in the scientific literature about the need for a more theoretical foundation to underpin quality of life (QoL) measurement. This paper applied Keyes et al.’s [J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 (2002) 1007] model of well-being as a framework to assess whether respondents (n = 136 students) focus on elements of subjective well-being (SWB), such as satisfaction and happiness, or on elements of psychological well-being (PWB), such as meaning and personal growth, when making individual QoL (IQoL) judgments using the Schedue of the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). The Keyes et al.’s model was confirmed and explained 41% of the variance in SEIQoL scores. Both SWB and PWB were correlated with the SEIQoL Index Score and SWB was found to be an important mediating variable in the relationship between PWB and SEIQoL. When analyzing different well-being combinations, respondents with high SWB/high PWB had significantly higher SEIQoL scores than did those with low SWB/low PWB. Respondents with high PWB/high SWB had higher SEIQoL scores than did those with high PWB/low SWB. Longitudinal studies in different patient groups are needed to explore the dynamic relationship between IQoL and well-being. Further investigation of the relationship between PWB and SWB with other instruments purporting to measure QoL would contribute to an enhanced understanding of the underlying nature of QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J.G.DW., 1988, Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle J., Wothke W., 1999, Amos 4.0 User`s Guide Chicago, IL, Small Waters Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K., Long J., 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models Newbury Park, CA, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon H., Stewart M., 1998, Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review Patient Education and Counselling 35: 161–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A., 2001, Measuring disease. Buckingham, Open University press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M., Cudeck R., 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K., Long J., (eds)., Testing Structural Eqaution Models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, pp. 136–162

  • Browne J.P., O’Boyle C.A., McGee H.M., McDonald N.J., Joyce C.R., 1997, Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains Quality of Life Research 6: 301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne B., 2001, Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford J.R., Henry J.D., 2004, The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample British Journal of Psychology 43: 245–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E., 2000, Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index American Psychologist 55: 34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S., 1985, The Satisfaction With Life Scale Journal of Personality Assessment 49: 71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E., Fujita F., 1997, Social comparisons and subjective well-being. In: Buunk B., Gibbons F., (eds.), Health, Coping and Well-Being. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 329–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkers M.P., 2003, Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: S3–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond M.F., O.Brien B., Stoddart G.L., Torrance G.W., 1999, Methods for the Evaluation of Health Care Programmes New York, Oxford University Press Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava G.A., Ruini C., 2003, Development and characteristics of a well-being enhancing psychotherapeutic strategy: well-being therapy Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 34: 45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., Fitzpatrick R., 2002, Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures BMJ 324: 1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S., Fonareva I., Merluzzi N., Morh D.C., 2005, Treatment for depression and its relationship to improvement in quality in quality of life and psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis patients Quality of Life Research 14: 695–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson D.W., 1996, Happiness and the Limits of Satisfaction Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce C.R., Hickey A., McGee H.M., O’Boyle C.A., 2003, A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL Quality of Life Research 12: 275–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, C.R.B., H.M. McGee, C.A. O’Boyle (eds.): 1999, Individual Quality of Life: Approaches to Conceptualisation and Assessment’, xii (Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam), 234 p

  • Kaplan G., Baron-Epel O., 2003, What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status? Social Science & Medicine 56: 1669–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes C.L., Shmotkin D., Ryff C.D., 2002, Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 1007–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline R., 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York, The Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McColl E., Meadows K., Barofsky I., 2003, Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment Quality of Life Research 12: 217–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee H.M., O’Boyle C.A., Hickey A., O’Malley K., Joyce C.R., 1991, Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population Psychological Medicine 21: 749–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. 1980, North American Social Report, ‘Vol.1: Foundations, Population and Health (Dordrecht)’

  • Naughton M.J., Wiklund I., 1993, A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research Quality of Life Research 2: 397–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, C., S. Clarke, G. Corscadden, L. Ring, and S. Höfer, `Can business managers benefit from quality of life assessment and feedback?’, in International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQoL), 1st Spring 2004 ISOQOL Meeting, Boston. (Abstract)

  • O’Boyle, C., H.M. McGee, A. Hickey, C.R.B. Joyce, J. Browne, and K. O’Malley, 1993, ‘The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life’, User Manual (Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin)

  • O’Boyle C.A., McGee H., Hickey A., O’Malley K., Joyce C.R., 1992, Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement Lancet, 339: 1088–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick D.L., Chiang Y.P., 2000, Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges Medical Care 38: II14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin J.M., Feinstein A.R., 2002, Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 75: 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapkin B.D., Schwartz C.E., 2004, Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift Health andQuality of Life Outcomes 2: 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta D.A., Garratt A.M., Leng M., Russell I.T., MacDonald L.M., 1994, A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index Medical Care 32: 1109–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., 2001, On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being Annual Review of Psychology 52: 141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff C.D., Keyes C.L., 1995, The structure of psychological well-being revisited Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff C.D., Singer B., 1996, Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 65: 14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff C.D., Singer B., 2002, From Social Structure to Biology. Integrative Science in Pursuit of Human Health and Well-being: Handbook of Positive Psychology Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 541–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff C.D., Singer B.H., Dienberg Love G., 2004, Positive health: connecting well-being with biology Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 1383–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman M.E., 2002, Authentic Happiness. Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Skevington S.M., Sartorius N., Amir M., 2004, Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer W.O., 1987, State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research Journal of Chronic Diseases 40: 465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taillefer M.-C., Dupuis G., Roberge M.-A., Le May S., 2003, Health-related quality of life models: systemic review of the literature Social Indicators Research 64: 293–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware J.E Jr., 2003, Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: S43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A., 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund I., 2004, Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 18: 351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This manuscript was completed while the authors Dr. Lena Ring and Dr. Stefan Höfer were EU Marie Curie Research Fellows at the Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Ring.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ring, L., Höfer, S., McGee, H. et al. Individual quality of life: can it be accounted for by psychological or subjective well-being?. Soc Indic Res 82, 443–461 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9041-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9041-y

Key words

Navigation