Abstract
One way of making the capability approach (CA) operational uses fuzzy poverty measures. In this paper, we present a new approach to applying these measures in the South African context using responses to a questionnaire on ‘The Essentials of Life’ in conjunction with a methodology for dealing with the vagueness of poverty. Our results suggest very low cut-offs for people or households to classify as definitely poor for some social indicators. These cut-offs are far lower than those Klasen used in his application of the CA. The attempt to apply the CA using Cheli and Lemmi’s ‘totally fuzzy and relative’ poverty measure in conjunction with our approach to specifying cut-offs can lead to incoherence. This measure can, nonetheless, be useful when social indicators have a ‘relativist component’. While the Cerioli and Zani measure does not lead to such incoherence, it also has a serious weakness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Cerioli S. Zani (1990) A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty C. Dagum and M. Zenga (Eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty Springer Verlag Berlin
B. Cheli A. Lemmi (1995) ArticleTitleA totally fuzzy and relative approach to the measurement of poverty Economic Notes 24 IssueID1 115–134
E. Chiappero Martinetti (1994) ArticleTitleA new approach to the evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory Giornale Degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 53 367–388
E. Chiappero Martinetti (1996) ArticleTitleStandard of living evaluation based on Sen’s approach some methodological suggestions Notizie di Politeia 12 37–53
E. Chiappero Martinetti (2000) ArticleTitleA multi-dimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach Rivista Internationale di Scienzie Sociali CVIII 207–231
D. A. Clark (2002) Visions of Development A Study of Human Values Edward Elgar Cheltenham
Clark, D. A. and M. Qizilbash: 2002, ‘Core poverty and extreme vulnerability in South Africa’, Economics Research Centre Discussion Paper 2002–3 (University of East Anglia, Norwich)
J. Drèze A. K. Sen (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity Oxford University Press Oxford
K. Fine (1975) ArticleTitleVagueness, truth and logic Synthese 30 265–300 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485047
J. Griffin (1986) Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance Clarendon Press Oxford
J. Griffin (1996) Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs Clarendon Press Oxford
S. Klasen (1997) ArticleTitlePoverty, inequality and deprivation in South Africa: An analysis of the 1993 SALDRU Survey Social Indicators Research 41 51–97 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006892216864
S. Klasen (2000) ArticleTitleMeasuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa Review of Income and Wealth 46 IssueID1 33–58 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00390.x
Lelli, S.: 2001, ‘Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets: Assessing the influence of different techniques on Sen’s functioning approach’, Paper Presented at the conference on ‘Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach’, Von Hügel Institute, St. Edmund’s College, Cambridge, June 2001
J. May (Eds) (2000) Poverty and Inequality in South Africa: Meeting the Challenge Zed Books New York and London
PSLSD: 1994, South Africans Rich and Poor: Baseline Statistics (Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, Cape Town)
M. Qizilbash (1997) ArticleTitlePluralism and well-being indices World Development 25 IssueID12 2009–2026 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00102-2
M. Qizilbash (2002) ArticleTitleA note on the measurement of poverty and vulnerability in the South African context Journal of International Development 14 757–772 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jid.922
M. Qizilbash (2003) ArticleTitleVague language and precise measurement: The case of poverty Journal of Economic Methodology 10 41–58 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1350178032000042059
RDP: Key Indicators of Poverty in South Africa (RDP, Pretoria)
Sen, A.K.: 1981, Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
A. K. Sen (1983) ArticleTitlePoor relatively speaking Oxford Economics Papers 35 153–169
A. K. Sen (1984) Resources, Values and Development Blackwell Oxford
A. K. Sen (1985) ArticleTitleA sociological approach to the measurement of poverty Oxford Economics Papers 37 669–676
A. K. Sen (1989) ArticleTitleEconomic methodology: heterogeneity and relevance Social Research 56 299–330
A. K. Sen (1992) Inequality Reexamined Clarendon Press Oxford
A. K. Sen (1993) Capability and well-being M. C. Nussbaum and A. K. Sen (Eds) The Quality of Life Clarendon Press Oxford
A. K. Sen (2004) ArticleTitleCapabilities, Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation Feminist Economics 10 77–80 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1354570042000315163
Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit: 2001, The Essentials of Life Questionnaire (compiled by D. Clark and M. Qizilbash with D. Horner, F. Esau and E. Pekeur). Downloadable from http:www.geocities.com/poverty_in_southafrica/papers_project.htm
P. Streeten (1981) First Things First: Meeting Basic Needs in Developing Countries Oxford University Press Oxford
Statistics South Africa: 1998, `The people of South Africa population census, 1996', Census in Brief (Statistics South Africa, Pretoria)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qizilbash, M., Clark, D.A. The Capability Approach and Fuzzy Poverty Measures: An Application to the South African Context. Soc Indic Res 74, 103–139 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6527-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6527-y