Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Croatian geomagnetic repeat station surveys in 2004 and 2007

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surveys of the geomagnetic declination, inclination and total field intensity were carried out at eight stations of the Croatian Geomagnetic Repeat Stations Network in 2004 and 2007. The total field time series at repeat stations and observatories were compared by use of the multi-linear regression and linear correlation coefficients. The surveys’ data were reduced to 2004.5 and 2007.5 epochs by a simple method proposed here, assuming the secular variations at the repeat station and observatory are equal or different, respectively. These reductions, obtained in reference to L’Aquila, Fürstenfeldbruck and Tihany observatories, and corresponding weighted as well as non-weighted averages, were compared. The preferred geomagnetic field elements as well as the corresponding annual changes between 2004.5 and 2007.5 epochs, were compared to the latest International Geomagnetic Reference Field. Additionally, the Croatian Geomagnetic Normal Reference Fields for 2004.5 and 2007.5 epochs were presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendat J.S. and Piersol A.G., 2000. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrkiĆ M., Šugar D., Rezo M., Markovinović D. and Bašić T., 2006. Croatian Geomagnetic Repeat Stations Network. In: Rasson J.L. and Delipetrov T. (Eds.), Geomagnetics for Aeronautical Safety, A Case Study in and around the Balkans. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brkić M. and Šugar D., 2008. Croatian geomagnetic normal reference field 2004.5. Geodetski list, 62(85), 1–8 (in Croatian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brkić M., Šugar D., Pavasović M. and Rezo M., 2009. Basic geomagnetic net in Croatia. In: Bosiljevac M. (Ed.), Izvješća o znanstveno — stručnim projektima 2006–2008., Državna geodetska uprava RH, Zagreb, Croatia, 79–86 (in Croatian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambodut A. and Mandea M., 2005. Evidence for geomagnetic jerks in comprehensive models. Earth Planets Space, 57, 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cueto M., McKnight D. and Herraiz M., 2003. Daily geomagnetic variations on the Iberian Peninsula. Geophys. J. Int., 152, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis A., Chiappini M., Dominici G. and Meloni A., 1997. Regional geomagnetic field modelling: the contribution of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica. Annal. Geophys., 40, 1161–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Santis A., Gaya-Pique L., Dominici G., Meloni A., Torta J.M. and Tozzi R., 2003. Italian Geomagnetic Reference Field (ITGRF): update for 2000 and secular variation model up to 2005 by autoregressive forecasting. Annal. Geophys., 46, 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski J. and Sucksdorff C., 1996. Guide for Magnetic Measurements and Observatory Practice. International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, Boulder, CO (http://www.iugg.org/IAGA/iaga_pages/pdf/IAGA-Guide-Observatories.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte M. and Mandea M., 2003. Improvements planned for European geomagnetic repeat stations. EOS Trans. Amer. Geophys. Soc., 84, 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte M. and Thébault E., 2007. Geomagnetic repeat station crustal biases and vectorial anomaly maps for Germany. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte M., Mandea M., Kotzé P., Nahayo E. and Pretorius B., 2007. Improved observations at the southern African geomagnetic repeat station network. S. Afr. J. Geol., 110, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs P., Kormendi A., Hegymegy L., Chiappini M. and Dominici G., 1999. The Hungarian magnetic network and the processing of the obtained data. Phys. Chem. Earth (A), 24, 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs P. and Kormendi A., 1999. Geomagnetic repeat station survey in Hungary during 1994–1995 and the secular variation of the field between 1950 and 1995. Geophys. Trans., 42(3–4), 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandea M. and Purucker M, 2005. Observing, modelling and interpreting magnetic fields of the solid Earth. Surv. Geophys., 26, 415–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloni A., Battelli O., De Santis A. and Dominici G., 1994. The 1990.0 magnetic repeat station survey and normal reference fields for Italy. Annal. Geophys., 37, 949–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newitt L.R., Barton C.E. and Bitterly J., 1996. Guide for Magnetic Repeat Station Surveys. International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, Boulder, CO (http://www.iugg.org/IAGA/iaga_pages/pdf/IAGA-Guide-Repeat-Stations.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N. and Mandea M., 2007. Investigation of a secular variation impulse using satellite data: The 2003 geomagnetic jerk. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 255, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. and Flannery B.P., 2001. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddihough R.P., 1971. Diurnal corrections to magnetic surveys — an assessment of errors. Geophys. Prospect., 19, 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St-Louis B. (Ed.), 2004. Intermagnet Technical Reference Manual (Version 4.2.). Online at http://www.intermagnet.org.

  • Sucksdorff, C., 1968. Measurements at Geomagnetic Secular Stations in Finland 1945–1967. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbanac G. and Korte M., 2006. The geomagnetic field in Croatia. Geofizika, 23(2), 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbanac G., Korte M. and Mandea M., 2007. On long-term trends of the European geomagnetic observatory biases. Earth Planets Space, 59, 685–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W.J., Xia G.H., An Z.C., Chen G.X., Zhang F.Y., Wang Y.H., Tian Y.G., Wei Z.G., Ma S.Z., and Chen H.F., 2003. Magnetic survey and China GRF 2000. Earth Planets Space, 55, 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugen Vujić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vujić, E., Brkić, M. & Radović, N. Analysis of Croatian geomagnetic repeat station surveys in 2004 and 2007. Stud Geophys Geod 55, 737–753 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-010-9037-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-010-9037-6

Keywords

Navigation