Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Justification of Social Inequality in Response to Masculinity Threats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research suggests that threatening men’s masculinity can lead to negative attitudes and aggressive behaviors. The current research expands on these findings by examining the effects of masculinity threats on attitudes about social inequality regarding women and gay men. Across studies, we predicted that men whose masculinity was threatened (compared to non-threatening controls) would be more accepting of social inequities that disadvantage women and gay men. Three hundred forty-four male students at a large northeastern U.S. university were randomly assigned to either (a) take a test about gender knowledge (Study 1 and 2) or (b) proofread either a gender knowledge test or university knowledge test (Study 2). Feedback on the test was altered to either threaten or assure masculinity. Following the test or proofreading task, men indicated their discomfort, anger (Study 2 only), and acceptance of discrimination and group-based inequality in society. In both studies identification with gender was measured as a potential moderator. The results of Study 1 (N = 160) showed that the masculinity manipulation only affected denial of discrimination against gay men, but this effect seemed to be related to the salience of gender rather than threatened masculinity. Study 2 (N = 184) added a gender salience comparison for clarification and replicated the results of Study 1, indicating that masculinity threats and assurances have effects independent of gender salience. In Study 1, men who were threatened and highly identified with their gender accepted more group-based inequality. The practical and social implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891–906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86. doi:10.1177/0963721411402669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J., & Taylor, J. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 623–634. doi:10.1177/0146167208331161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Weaver, J. R., Caswell, T. A., & Burnaford, R. M. (2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 471–486. doi:10.1177/1368430211432893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. P. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. M., Seibert, L. A., & Zeichner, A. (2009). The role of restrictive emotionality, trait anger, and masculinity threat in men’s perpetration of physical aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 218–224. doi:10.1037/a0015151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J. L., Vescio, T. K., & Weaver, K. S. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology (in press).

  • Dambrun, M., Duarte, S., & Guimond, S. (2004). Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 287–297. doi:10.1348/0144666041501714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Augelli, A. R., Grossman, A. H., & Starks, M. T. (2006). Childhood gender atypicality, victimization, and PTSD among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1462–1482. doi:10.1177/0886260506293482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109. doi:10.1080/10478400903028540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foels, R., & Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: Gender and social dominance orientation. Sex Roles, 50, 743–757. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029094.25107.d6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351–378. doi:10.1007/BF00289761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565–582. doi:10.1007/BF01544212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55–59. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. J., & Sanchez, D. T. (2009). Communal stereotypes prime men’s benevolent sexism: Implications for romance and family. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 88–94. doi:10.1037/a0013427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmacher Institute. (2012). Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: State trends at midyear, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2012/statetrends22012.html.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  • Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49–71. doi:10.1080/10478400802049936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Sex Roles, 61, 794–807. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9689-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, S. S. (2007). Adolescents’ acceptance of same-sex peers based on sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 363–371. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9111-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilianski, S. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men’s attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 37–56. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmiller, J. J., Law, A. T., & Tormala, T. T. (2010). The effect of self-affirmation on sexual prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 276–285. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Life at Conception Act of 2011, H. R. 374, 112th Cong. (2011). Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.374.

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriage Protection Amendment of 2004, H. J. RES. 106, 108th Cong. (2004). Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.106.

  • Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163–180. doi:10.1177/1368430206062075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, H. (2010, July/August). The end of men. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/8135/.

  • Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to ones prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510–517. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186. doi:10.1348/014466603322127166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. (2012, May 8). Amendment one: North Carolina gay marriage ban passes. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76081.html.

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, T. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Old Tappan: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, A. E., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2008). Evaluations and aggression directed at a gay male target: The role of threat and antigay prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 647–683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00321.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taywaditep, K. J. (2001). Marginalization among the marginalized: Gay men’s anti-effeminacy attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 1–28. doi:10.1300/J082v42n01_01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi:10.1177/000276486029005003.

  • Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607. doi:10.1007/BF02651094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–39. doi:10.1037/a0012453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, T. K., & Biernat, M. (2003). Family values and antipathy toward gay men. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 833–847. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01927.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, T. K., & Dahl, J. L. (2013). Sugar-coated discrimination: How subtle sexism undermines women. In R. Ely & A. Cuddy (Eds.), Gender and work: Challenging conventional wisdom research symposium (pp. 27–34). Boston: Harvard Business School.

  • Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, T. K., Schlenker, K. A., & Lenes, J. G. (2010). Power and sexism. In A. Guinote & T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 363–380). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B., & Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022. doi:10.1086/668417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics

I certify that we have complied with the APA ethical principles regarding research with human participants and/or care of animals in the conduct of the research presented in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Kevin S. Weaver & Theresa K. Vescio

Authors
  1. Kevin S. Weaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theresa K. Vescio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin S. Weaver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weaver, K.S., Vescio, T.K. The Justification of Social Inequality in Response to Masculinity Threats. Sex Roles 72, 521–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0484-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0484-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation