Abstract
This paper evaluated the construct and concurrent validity of a Chinese short form of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire, which measures instrumentality and expressivity as independent traits. In Study 1, 293 Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates completed the scale. Factor analysis revealed two independent factors, instrumentality and expressivity. In Study 2, 269 Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates completed the scale together with the dominance and nurturance scales of the Personality Research Form and Gudykunst’s Self-Construal Scale. Exploratory factor analysis replicated the bidimensional structure of the scale. Instrumentality correlated with independent self-construal and dominance, whereas expressivity correlated with interdependent self-construal and nurturance. Gender differences in item scores overall conformed to theoretical expectations. The findings indicate that the scale produces valid and reliable scores.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 152–162.
Brannon, L. (2005). Gender: Psychological perspectives (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Chang, H. C., & Holt, R. G. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. New York: State University of New York Press.
Cheng, C., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2005). Processes underlying gender-role flexibility: Do androgynous individuals know more or know how to cope? Journal of Personality, 73, 645–673.
Cheung, K. F. M. (1996). Cultural adjustment and differential acculturation among Chinese new immigrant families in the US. In S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way (pp. 321–356). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Choi, N., & Fuqua, D. R. (2003). The structure of the bem sex role inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 872–887.
Costa, P. T., Terraciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
Francis, L. J., & Wilcox, C. (1998). The relationship between Eysenck’s personality dimensions and Bem’s masculinity and femininity scales revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 683–687.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Lee, C. M. (2003). Assessing the validity of self construal scales. A Response to Levine et al. Human Communication Research, 29, 253–274.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510–543.
Gurtman, M. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 105–118.
Jackson, D. N. (1989). Personality research form manual (4th ed.). Port Huron: Sigma Assessment Systems, Inc.
Jackson, D. N., & Helmes, E. (1979). Personality structure and the circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2278–2285.
Hall, J. A., & Taylor, M. C. (1985). Psychological androgyny and the masculinity x femininity interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 429–435.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of personal attributes questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097–1108.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416.
Keyes, S. (1984). Measuring sex-roles stereotypes: Attitudes among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents and the development of the Chinese sex-role inventory. Sex Roles, 10, 129–140.
Leung, C., & Moore, S. (2003). Individual and cultural gender roles: A comparison of Anglo-Australians and Chinese in Australia. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/∼grpproc.
Li, M. C. (1981). The construction of sex trait inventory and the comparisons of four sex trait categories on achievement motive and attitudes toward marriage, career and sex. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 23, 23–37.
McCreary, D. R., & Steinberg, M. (1992). The personal attributes questionnaire in Britain: Establishing construct validity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 369–378.
Moneta, G. B., & Wong, F. H. Y. (2001). The construct validity of the Chinese adaptation of four thematic scales of the personality research form. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 459–476.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Internalized gender role attributes and motivational dispositions in talented teenagers. Psychology, The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 10, 181–191.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shifren, K., & Bauserman, E. (1996). The relationship between instrumental and expressive traits, health behaviors and perceived physical health. Sex Roles, 34, 841–864.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44. Ms. No. 617.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Sugihara, Y., & Katsurada, E. (2002). Gender role development in Japanese culture: Diminishing gender role differences in a contemporary society. Sex Roles, 47, 443–452.
Young, F. W. (2003). ViSta: “The Visual Statistics System” [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://forrest.psych.unc.edu/research/index.html
Ward, C. A. (2000). Models and measurements of psychological androgyny: a cross-cultural extension of theory and research. Sex Roles, 43, 529–552.
Ward, C. A., & Sethi, R. R. (1986). Cross-cultural validation of the Bem sex role inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 300–314.
Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183–221). New York: Wiley.
Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1985). The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 1–47). Greenwich: JAU.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Newbury Park: Sage.
Wilson, F. R., & Cook, E. P. (1984). Concurrent validity of four androgyny instruments. Sex Roles, 11, 813–837.
Wong, C. S., Tinsley, C., Law, K. S., & Mobley, W. H. (2003). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of Guanxi. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 4, 43–69.
Zhang, J., Norvilitis, J. M., & Jin, S. (2001). Measuring gender orientation with the Bem sex role inventory in Chinese culture. Sex Roles, 44, 23–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The Chinese translation of the 16 items of the short form of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ).
English Item | Chinese Item |
Warm in relation with others (E) | 待人親切 |
Helpful to others (E) | 幫助別人 |
Understanding of others (E) | 明白他人 |
Kind (E) | 仁慈 |
Aware of feelings of others (E) | 察覺別人的感受 |
Emotional (E) | 感情豐富 |
Able to devote self completely to others (E) | 與人相處時能全情投入 |
Gentle (E) | 溫柔 |
Self-confident (I) | 自信 |
Can make decisions easily (I) | 決斷 |
Competitive (I) | 富競爭性 |
Independent (I) | 獨立 |
Feels superior (I) | 高人一等 |
Stands up well under pressure (I) | 善於處理壓力 |
Never gives up (I) | 永不放棄 |
Active (I) | 活躍 |
Note. E = expressivity item; I = instrumentality item.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moneta, G.B. Chinese Short Form of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire: Construct and Concurrent Validity. Sex Roles 62, 334–346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9730-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9730-5