Abstract
We investigated the construction of gender in chat groups. Four unacquainted persons chatted in two gender-anonymous conditions and a non-anonymous control condition. In one anonymous condition, the gender focus was made salient. The other groups did not know about the gender focus. All participants had to guess the gender of the others and give reasons for their decisions. Results suggest that (a) overall, 2/3 of gender guesses fit the sex category of the targets, (b) gender anonymity was more comfortable for women, (c) participants used mostly gender-stereotypic cues to infer gender, however, men and women used syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic cues (with different predictive value) to different degrees, (d) conversational behavior varied depending on gender anonymity, and (e) degree of gender salience was irrelevant for the use of gender as an organizing category.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, B. (1995). Gender and computer-mediated communication. Sex Roles, 32, 557–563.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentation view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.
Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163–194.
Berger, J., Connor, T., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge: Winthorp.
Bhappu, A., Griffith, T., & Northcraft, G. (1997). Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 199–205.
Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707–724.
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20.
Bortz, J. (1993). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Braun, F. (2001). The communication of gender in Turkish. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages (Vol. 1, pp. 283–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Butler, J. (1991). Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage.
Crowston, K., & Kammerer, E. (1998). Communicative style and gender differences in computer-mediated communication. In E. Bosah (Ed.), Cyberghetto or cybertopia? Race, class, and gender on the Internet (pp. 185–203). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask. Gender, play, and performance on the Internet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting communication and community (pp. 129–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-conforming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 788–827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context. An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
Dennis, A., Kinney, S., & Hung, Y. (1999). Gender effects and the effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30, 405–437.
Doering, N. (1999). Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Dubrowsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. M. (2000). The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (1994). Interaktion und Geschlecht. Frankfurt: Fischer.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex difference: Communication accuracy and expressive style. London: Hopkins.
Hall, J. A., & Carter, J. D. (1999). Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 350–359.
Hannah, A., & Murachver, T. (1999). Gender and conversational style as predictors of conversational behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 153–174.
Herring, S. (1996a). Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Herring, S. (1996b). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 115–142). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Herrschel, R. (1994). The impact of varying gender composition on group brainstorming performance in a GSS environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 209–222.
Jaffe, J. M., Lee, Y., Huang, L., & Oshagan, H. (1995). Gender, pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking identities and bearing souls. Retreived 03/19/1999 from http://research.haifa.ac.il/jmjaffe/genderpseudocmc.html
Jessup, L., Connolly, T., & Tansik, D. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The de-individuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21, 333–348.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: Wiley.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
Koch, S. (2004). Constructing gender: A lens-model inspired gender communication approach. Sex Roles, 51, 171–186.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lott, B. (1995). Distancing from women: Interpersonal sexist discrimination. In B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.), The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination (pp. 12–49). New York: Guilford Press.
Marecek, J., Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2004). On the construction of gender, sex, and sexualities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 192–216). New York: Guilford.
Markus, H., & Oyserman, D. (1989). Gender and thought. The role of the self-concept. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and though: Psychological perspectives (pp. 100–127). New York: Springer.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups, interaction, and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the “G” back in GSS: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 78–96). New York: MacMillan.
Merten, K. (1995). Inhaltsanalyse. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.
Mueller, B. (2001). “Doing Gender” im Chat. Heidelberg: Unpublished Diplomarbeit.
Mulac, A. (1998). The gender-linked language effect. Do language differences really make a difference? In D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 127–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Perspectives on marital interaction. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1992). Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York: Springer.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–656.
Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Oesterreich, E. (1999). Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 185–194.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sciences, 32, 1492–1513.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives of the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33–669). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.
Thimm, C., Rademacher, U., & Kruse, L. (1994). Power-related talk: Control in verbal interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 328–407.
Thomson, R., & Murachver, T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 193–208.
Turkle, S. (1998). Leben im Nets: Identitaet in Zeiten des Internet. Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
Zumbach, J. (2002). Weiterbildung online. In C. Thimm (Ed.), Unternehmenskommunikation offline/online (pp. 260–288). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, S.C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L. et al. Constructing Gender in Chat Groups. Sex Roles 53, 29–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4276-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4276-7