Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The selection of high-quality manuscripts

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to the factor of impact and other bibliometric indices, generation of a net profit year on year plays a central role in measuring overall journal publishing performance. However, some business models do not allow the academic journals continue to thrive since they are not financially sustainable. It raises a number of questions which have to be answered: how does the journal’s wealth grow given a particular allocation strategy of journal resources? What is the optimal allocating strategy of journal resources that maximizes the growth rate of journal’s wealth? What is the value of the side information for the selection of high-quality manuscripts? And, what is the effective growth rate of journal’s wealth if there exists dependence among successive selections of high quality manuscripts? This paper proves that information theoretic quantities like entropy and mutual information arise as the answers to these fundamental questions in the selection of high-quality manuscripts and allocation of journal’s wealth. Based on the uncovered relationships between the growth rate of journal’s wealth and the selection of high-quality manuscripts, we propose a number of basic guidelines for improving the journal publishing performance (e.g., match probabilities of high quality when placing the allocations of journal resources among the submitted manuscripts and focus on management practices that promote selection processes with less uncertainty of the outcome).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cover, T. M., Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory, chapter 6: Gambling and data compression (pp. 125–143). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., Shulenburger, D. (2003). The high cost of scholarly journals (and what to do about It). Change, 35(6), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2011). Overall prestige of journals with ranking score above a given threshold. Scientometrics, 89(1), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2012). On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact. Scientometrics, 90(3), 925–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Stengos, T., & Mamuneas, T. P. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Technical Journal, 35, 917–926.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., & Tenopir, C. (1998). Economic Cost Models of Scientific Scholarly Journals. University of Tennessee School of Information Sciences Center for Information Studies Paper presented to the ICSU Press Workshop, Keble College, Oxford, UK, March 31 to April 2, 1998.

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1991). The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory. Social Networks 13, 301–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loève, M. (1960). Probability theory. New York: Van Nostrand.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. (2005). The true costs of scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 18, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham, M. (2005). JISC: Learned Society Open Access Business Models. Mary Waltham Publishing Consultant. http://www.MaryWaltham.com.

  • Waltham, M. (2009). The Future of Scholarly Journals Publishing Among Social Science and Humanities Associations. Mary Waltham Publishing Consultant. http://www.MaryWaltham.com.

  • Wellcome Trust (2003). Economic analysis of scientific research publishing: A report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. Histon, Cambridgeshire: SQW Limited.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Spanish Board for Science and Technology (MICINN) under grant TIN2010-15157 cofinanced with European FEDER funds. Sincere thanks are due to the reviewers for their insightful comments, constructive suggestions, and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación e I. A., CITIC-UGR, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain

    J. A. García, Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. Fdez-Valdivia

Authors
  1. J. A. García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Fdez-Valdivia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, J.A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R. & Fdez-Valdivia, J. The selection of high-quality manuscripts. Scientometrics 98, 299–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1034-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1034-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation