Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation assessment in traditional industries. A proposal of aesthetic innovation indicators

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovative activities are fundamental to the competitiveness strategies of the firms in a globalized market. Their assessment, using indicators such as those utilized in the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), shows significant sectoral dispersion. Traditional industries are in a weak position because the innovation they are involved in is mainly aesthetic, which is not really addressed in innovation surveys. In this work, we review the various criticisms levelled at existing indicators and propose some new indicators that would capture the types of innovations that are conducted by the traditional industries. This work is based on a study of the features of traditional industries and the concept of aesthetic novelty. The proposed indicators are tested in the Spanish footwear industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., Varga, A. (2002), Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy, 31(7): 1069–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcaide, J. (2004), Análisis de las Interrelaciones entre los Procesos de Diseño de Producto e Innovación y la Estructura Industrial en el Sector del Calzado de la Comunidad Valenciana, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.

  • Arundel, A., Smith, K., Patel, P., Sirilli, G. (1998), The Future of Innovation Measurement in Europe. Concepts, Problems and Practical Directions, IDEA Paper Series Report 3.

  • Becattini, G. (1990), The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, In: F. Pyke, G. Becattini, W. Senegenberger (Eds), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertarelli, S., Censolo, R. (2000), Preference for Novelty and Price Behaviour, Working Papers 383, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Economia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, G., Bortolotti, F. (1996), On the Concept of Formal Innovation, European Regional Science Association 36th European Congress, Zurich.

  • Bianchi, M. (2002), Novelty, preferences, and fashion: when goods are unsettling, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buesa, M., Molero, J. (1996), Innovación y Diseño Industrial, Evaluación de la Política de Promoción del Diseño en España, Colección Economía, Ed. Civitas. ISBN 84-470-0648-4. Madrid.

  • Calvo, J. (2000), Una caracterización de la innovación tecnológica en los sectores manufactureros españoles: algunos datos, Economía Industrial, 331: 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulkins, J. P., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., Feichtinger, G. (2003), Explaining Fashion Cycles: Chasing Innovators by Imitators, Workshop on Economic Dynamics, Free University of Bozen/Bolzano.

  • Chayutsahakij, P., Poggenpohl, S. (2002), User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation, Proceedings of The European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, EURAM, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. S., Merrill, S. A. (Eds) (1997), Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, G., Jeanne, O. (1994), A Theory of Fashion Based on Segmented Communication, Discussion Paper No A-462, University of Bonn.

  • COTEC (1998), El Sistema Español de Innovación, Diagnósticos y recomendaciones. Libro Blanco, Fundación COTEC para la Innovación Tecnológica, ISBN: 84-922720-4-X.

  • Dalmau, J. I., Hervás, J. L. (2002), Análisis Cuantitativo del “Efecto Distrito”. Evidencia Empírica para la Industria Azulejera Española, XII Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, Palma de Mallorca.

  • DTI (2001), UK Innovation Survey, Office for National Statistics, Department of Trade and Industry.

  • Dodgson, M. (2001), Measuring Innovation, International Conference on “Measuring and Evaluating Industrial R&D and Innovation in the Knowledge-based Economy”, Taipei.

  • EUP (2001), Enforcing Small Firms’ Patent Rights 2001, European Union Publisher, ISBN 92-894-0633-X.

  • EUROSTAT (2001), Third Community Innovation Survey, Harmonised Questionnaire.

  • FICE (2004), Federación de Empresas del Calzado Español, Anuario del Calzado 2004. FICE.

  • Freeman, C. (1982), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2002), The Rise of Innovation Surveys: Measuring a Fuzzy Concept, Observatoire des sciences et des technologies. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics Working Paper No. 16.

  • González, A. (1998), El diseño industrial, factor clave en la gestión e innovación empresariales. La política del MINER, Revista de Economía Industrial, 324 (VI. Diseño Industrial y Desarrollo de Producto): 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. K., Samuel, A. K. (2001), Integrating Market Research with the Product Development Process: A Step towards Design for Profit, Proceedings of DETC 2001: ASME Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

  • Hart, D. (2000), Innovation Clusters: Key Concepts, Working Papers in Land Management and Development 06/00. University of Reading.

  • Heskett, J. (1997), Design for profit, In: D. Steenstra (Ed.), Design for Profit Report: Proceeding Report of the Design for Profit Seminar, University of Warwick Print Service, pp. 18–23.

  • INE (2002), Encuesta sobre innovación tecnológica en las empresas (2000), Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITI (2001), South African Innovation Survey 2001 for Manufacturing and Services, University of Pretoria and Eindhoven Centre for Innovation.

  • Iversen, E. J. (1998), Understanding innovation indicators based on patents, In: Smith, K. (Ed), Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: a Guide for Policy Makers, IDEA Paper Series no 5, STEP, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R. (2002), Assessing Design Innovation, Assessing Design Innovation, Working Paper, Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths University of London.

  • Kline, S. J., Rosenberg, N. (1986), An overview of innovation, In: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K., Butter, R. (1984), Product semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form, The Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, 4–9.

  • Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, Macmillan, Londres.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCT (2001), Terceiro Inquérito Comunitário à Inovação. (CIS III), Questionário relativo ao processo de Inovação na empresa referente a 1998–2000, Ministério da Ciência e da Tecnologia, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen, P., Therrien, P. (2001), How Innovative Are Canadian Firms Compared to Some European Firms? A Comparative Look at Innovation Surveys, CIRANO Working Paper 2001s-49.

  • Mutlu, B., Er, A. (2003), Design Innovation: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on Product Innovation by Design, Proceedings of the 5th European Academy of Design Conference, Barcelona.

  • OECD (1994), Proposed Standard Practice for Survey of Research and Development, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators, (Patent Manual), OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1997), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI, 2nd Edition, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, OECD.

  • OECD (2005), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI, 3rd Edition, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, C. J., Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottum, B. D., Moore, W. L. (1997), The role of market information in new product success/failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13: 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesendorfer, W. (1995), Design innovation and fashion cycles, American Economic Review, 85(4): 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F., Koch, M., Möslein, K., Schubert, P. (2003), Managing High Variety: How to Overcome the Mass Confusion Phenomenon of Customer Co-Design, Proceedings of the EURAM 2003 Conference, Milan.

  • Pugh, S. (1996), Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design: The Living Legacy of Stuart Pugh, Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.

  • Rae, J. (1834), The Sociological Theory of Capital, New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (1998), The Definition and Measurement of Innovation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 10/98. University of Melbourne.

  • Rothwell, R. (1992), Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s’, R&D Management, 22(3): 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1994), Industrial innovation: Success, strategy, trends, In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, Elgar Publishing Limited, Vermont, pp. 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sancho, R. (2001), Directrices de la OECD para la Obtención de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología, V Taller Iberoamericano e Interamericano de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología.

  • Sandven, T., Smith, K. (1998), Understanding R&D Intensity Indicators. Effects of Differences in Industrial Structure and Country Size, IDEA Report 14.

  • Sanz, L., Arias, E. (1998), Especialización y capacidades tecnológicas de las regiones españolas: un análisis a través de las patentes europeas, Economía Industrial, 324(6): 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, 1966.

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, T. S. (2002), Managing Interactions between Technological and Stylistic Innovation in the Media Industries, ERIM Report Series Research in Management. ERS-2002-16-ORG.

  • Sirilli, G. (1998), Conceptualizing and Measuring Technological Innovation, IDEA Paper Series 1, STEP Group, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1998), Innovation indicators, In: Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: a Guide for Policy Makers, IDEA Paper Series 5, STEP Group, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2001), Measurement of Innovation in Europe: Concepts, Experience and Results, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies Working Paper No. 17.

  • Statistics Canada (1999), Survey of Innovation 1999, Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division.

  • STEP (2000), The Analysis of CIS II Data: Towards an Identification of Regional Innovation Systems, STEP Economics, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. (2001), Identifying Innovation, Innovators and Innovative Behaviours: A Critical Assessment of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), CRIC Discussion Paper No 48.

  • Tomlinson, M. (2000), Innovation Surveys: A Researcher’s Perspective, DRUID Working Paper No 00-9.

  • Tortajada, E., Fernández, I., Ybarra, J. A. (2005), Evolución de la industria española del calzado. Factores relevantes en las últimas décadas, Economía Industrial, 355–356: 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdecantos, M. (1998), Contexto y expectativas del diseño en el proceso de innovación, Revista de Economía Industrial, 324(VI): 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M. (1988), Competitive by design, Journal of Marketing Management, 4(2): 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylant, B. (2002), Industrial Design and Innovation Theory, A Basis for Describing the Experience of Innovation, Industrial Designers Society of America (ISDA) National Education Conference, 2002.

  • Ybarra, J. A., Giner, J. M., Santa María, M. J. (2002), El calzado en España: del sector al territorio. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante. Alicante.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Project Engineering Department, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Jorge Alcaide-Marzal

  2. INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Valencia, Spain

    Enrique Tortajada-Esparza

Authors
  1. Jorge Alcaide-Marzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrique Tortajada-Esparza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Alcaide-Marzal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcaide-Marzal, J., Tortajada-Esparza, E. Innovation assessment in traditional industries. A proposal of aesthetic innovation indicators. Scientometrics 72, 33–57 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1708-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1708-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation