Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Value of the Philosophy of Science in Senior High School Science Education from the Perspective of the Nature of Science

  • SI: Family Resemblance Approach
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that teaching the history and philosophy of science (POS) can help improve senior high school students’ scientific literacy. The history of science is usually taught in school science lessons by reference to particular cases, experiments, and scientists. In contrast, the POS — that is, the study of general and fundamental questions regarding the nature of science (NOS) — is often embedded within lessons, is considered difficult to teach, and is sometimes hidden from students. This research analyses the overlap between the conceptualisations of the NOS and the POS. The paper also reports on a study that used “explicit” pedagogical methods to teach topics related to the POS to Chinese senior high school students. The empirical results, which are supported by a theoretical framework that adopts the family resemblance approach to the NOS, show that students who participated in this POS course significantly improved their scientific literacy and their understanding of the relationships among science, technology, and society. The POS topics in this course helped students better understand the cognitive-epistemic system in the NOS. The findings of this small-scale study have broader implications for the way in which the POS is taught in high school education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: ‘Views on Science—Technology—Society’ (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2004). Should the sociology of science be rated X? Science Education, 88(6), 934–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabatzis, T., & Schickore, J. (2012). Ways of integrating history and philosophy of science. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, M., Fleury, S. C., & Garrison, J. (2007). Critical constructivism for teaching and learning in a democratic society. Journal of Thought, 42(3–4), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, L., Norris, T., & Pinto, L. E. (2019). Teaching and learning philosophy in Ontario high schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(5), 678–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R. M. (2001). The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., & Millar, R. (1996). Young people’s images of science. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Dagher, Z. R., Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education (pp. 1–18). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (2005). Thought and reflection. Flusser Studies, 1(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, K. E., Masters, H., & Akerson, V. L. (2015). Using history of science to teach nature of science to elementary students. Science & Education, 24(9–10), 1103–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2019). Philosophy of science and its discontents. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020). Reconceptualizing nature-of-science education in the age of social media. Science Education, 104(4), 641–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or how the family resemblance approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25(9–10), 1115–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 139–165). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kötter, M., & Hammann, M. (2017). Controversy as a blind spot in teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 26(5), 451–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvarme, L. G., Helseth, S., Sørum, R., Luth-Hansen, V., Haugland, S., & Natvig, G. K. (2010). The effect of a solution-focused approach to improve self-efficacy in socially withdrawn school children: A non-randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1389–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J. (2012). Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, Y. (2020). Teaching the nature of science from a philosophical perspective. Science & Education, 29(5), 1417–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (2004). The epistemic, the cognitive, and the social. Science, Values, and Objectivity, 14–23.

  • Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Routledge.

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 614–634). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. Online Submission, 1, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehavi, Y., & Eylon, B.-S. (2018). Integrating science education research and history and philosophy of science in developing an energy curriculum History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 235–260): Springer

  • Malaterre, C., Chartier, J.-F., & Pulizzotto, D. (2019). What is this thing called philosophy of science? A computational topic-modeling perspective, 1934–2015. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 215–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2017). History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2017). Understanding how science works: The nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 98(365), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellado, V., Ruiz, C., Bermejo, M. L., & Jiménez, R. (2006). Contributions from the philosophy of science to the education of science teachers. Science & Education, 15, 419–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudavanhu, Y., & Zezekwa, N. (2017). The views of nature of science expressed by in-service teachers who were learning history and philosophy of science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(3), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okan, B., Kaya, E. (2022). Exploring the inclusion of nature of science in Turkish middle school Science textbooks. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00371-x

  • Okasha, S. (2016). Philosophy of science: Very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Frels, R. K., & Hwang, E. (2016). Mapping Saldana’s coding methods onto the literature review process. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1), 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2006/9

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolino, M., & Bresadola, M. (2013). Shocking frogs: Galvani, Volta, and the electric origins of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics and language teaching (p. 327). Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. G. (2017). The role of ethics, culture, and artistry in scientific illustration. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-el-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X. (2021). Using explicit teaching of philosophy to promote understanding of the nature of science: a case study from a Chinese high school. Science & Education, 30(2), 409–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1101–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., De Vos, W., Verloop, N., & Dekkers, H. (1998). Developing secondary students’ conceptions of chemical reactions: The introduction of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2003). Ludwig Wittgenstein. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo, China

    Xiaoming Shi

  2. The Institute of Asia and Pacific Studies, University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China

    Xiaoming Shi

Authors
  1. Xiaoming Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X. The Value of the Philosophy of Science in Senior High School Science Education from the Perspective of the Nature of Science. Sci & Educ 32, 1613–1636 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00451-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00451-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation