Abstract
“The idea of nature” (general model of how things work) that is accepted in a society strongly influences that group’s social and technological progress. Currently, science education concentrates on analysis of stable pre-existing items to minimum constituents. This emphasis is consistent with an outlook that has been widely accepted since the late Renaissance—that characteristics of individuals depend exclusively on the properties of their microscopic components. Much of 19th and 20th century science seems compatible with that now-traditional outlook. But major parts of contemporary science (and fundamental technological problems) deal with open-system dynamic coherences that display novel and important characteristics. These important entities are not adequately treated by the presently-dominant idea of nature. In contrast, the notion of how the world works that contemporary science and current technological practice generate emphasizes synthesis and self-organization of far-from-equilibrium “dissipative structures.” Arguably, eventual success in meeting the severe technological and social challenges occasioned by increasing world population will require general diffusion and appreciation of that newer overall outlook. Chemistry educators have been important in developing and disseminating the earlier worldview—they can and should provide leadership for widespread adoption of the alternative idea of nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“And a century before Defoe [ca. 1660–1731], the English were beginning to learn from the Dutch the improving spirit of active, striving, laborious men such as will put their hand to the plow, try experiments, and give all their attention to what they are about.” This transition was also accompanied by a change in rhetoric: “It is a methodical and accounting rhetoric, tied to practical hope and courage, and foreign to the bold gestures in court and battlefield of an aristocratic society” (McCloskey 2010, pp. 367–368).
Chemsystems.com reports that: “The world consumed over 600 million tons of feedstocks in 2009 in the production of … basic petrochemicals.… Total global feedstock consumption is projected to reach 1 billion tons [per year] by 2025.”
Since the end of the Cold War had reduced the apparent military importance of high-energy physics, the US Congress cancelled its annual funding of the corresponding American experiment (The Superconducting Super Collider) in 1993—after more than two billion dollars had been spent on that project.
Tom Stoppard’s prize-winning 1993 play Arcadia now leads in this regard.
References
Armstrong, D. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. (2010). Sketch for a systematic metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arnason, J., Eisenstadt, S., & Witt, B. (Eds.). (2005). Axial civilizations and world history. Leiden: Brill.
Atran, S. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Faith, brotherhood, and the (Un)making of terrorists. NY: HarperCollins.
Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to pro-social religions. Biological Theory, 5(1), 18–30.
Batterman, R. (2002). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Batterman, R. (2009). Idealization and modeling. Synthese, 169, 427–446.
Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, M., & Hacker, P. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berry, M. (1994). Asymptotics, singularities and the reduction of theories. In D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, & D. Westerstahl (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy (Vol. IX, pp. 597–607). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
Bishop, R., & Atmanspacher, H. (2006). Contextual emergence in the description of properties. Foundations of Physics, 36(12), 1753–1777.
Bolender, J. (2010). The self-organizing social mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bryce, T. (2010). Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 591–612.
Carroll, S. (2006). Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo-Devo. New York: Norton.
Cartwright, N., et al. (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cauvin, J. (2000). The birth of the gods and the origins of agriculture (trans: Watkins, T.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaisson, E. (2006). Epic of evolution: Seven ages of the cosmos. NY: Columbia University Press.
Collingwood, R. (1945). The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human consciousness. NY: Norton.
Earley, J. (1996). An introductory course in modeling dynamic chemical and ecological systems. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(6), 526.
Earley, J. (2003). Constraints on the origin of coherence in far-from-equilibrium chemical systems. In T. Eastman & H. Keeton (Eds.), Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, process and experience (pp. 63–73). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Earley, J. (2004). Would introductory chemistry courses work better with a new philosophical basis? Foundations of Chemistry, 6, 137–160.
Earley, J. (2006). Chemical “substances” that are not “chemical substances”. Philosophy of Science, 73, 814–852.
Earley, J. (2008). Process structural realism, instance ontology, and societal order. In F. Riffert & H. Sander (Eds.), Researching with Whitehead: System and adventure (pp. 190–211). Berlin: Alber.
Earley, J. (2012). A neglected aspect of the puzzle of chemical structure: How history helps. Foundations of Chemistry. doi:10.007/s 19698-012-9146-0.
Epstein, I., & Pojman, J. (1998). An introduction to nonlinear chemical dynamics: Oscillations, waves, patterns, and chaos. NY: Oxford University Press.
Fogel, R. (2010). Catching up with the economy. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 1–21.
Gare, A. (2010). Toward an ecological civilization: The science, ethics, and politics of eco-poesis. Process Studies, 39(1), 5–38.
Goldstone, J. (2009). Why Europe? The rise of the West in world history, 1500–1850 (p. 120). NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gray, H. (2009). Powering the planet with solar fuel. Nature Chemistry, 1, 7.
Greenblatt, S. (2012). The swerve: How the world became modern. New York: Norton.
Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. NY: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. NY: Oxford University Press.
Kincheloe, J., & Tobin, K. (2009). The much exaggerated death of positivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 513–528.
Kondepudi, D., & Prigogine, I. (1998). Modern thermodynamics: From heat engines to dissipative structures. NY: Wiley.
Laughlin, R. (2005). A different universe: Inventing physics from the bottom down. NY: Basic Books.
Marcus, J., & Flannery, K. (2004). The coevolution of ritual and society: New 14C dates from ancient Mexico. PNAS (USA), 101(52), 18257–18261.
Mason, S. (1991). Chemical evolution: Origins of the elements, molecules, & living systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, M. (2004). Reappraising positivism and education: The arguments of Philipp Frank and Herbert Feigl. Science & Education, 13, 7–39.
McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mellor, D. (2006). Wholes and parts: The limits of composition. South African Journal of Philosophy, 25(2), 138–145.
Mitchell, S. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, O. (1959). Protocol sentences. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Newth, D., & Finnigan, J. (2006). Emergence and self-organization in chemistry and biology. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 59, 841–848.
Ney, A. (2009). Physical causation and difference-making. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 737–764.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. NY: Free Press.
Primas, H. (1998). Emergence in the exact natural sciences. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 91, 83–98.
Schneider, E., & Sagan, D. (2005). Into the cool: Energy flow, thermodynamics, and life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shinar, G., & Feinberg, M. (2010). Structural sources of robustness in biological networks. Science, 327, 1389–1391.
Smith, E., & Morowitz, H. (2004). Universality in Intermediary Metabolism. PNAS (USA), 101(36), 13168–13173.
Thompson, F. (1968). The second agricultural revolution, 1815–1880. The Economic History Review, 21, 62–77.
Whitehead, A. ([1926] 1967). Science and the modern world: Lowell lectures, 1925. NY: Free Press.
Whitehead, A. ([1929] 1978). Process and reality, Corrected edition, D. Griffin & D. Sherburne (Eds.). NY: Macmillan.
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges a research grant from the Graduate School of Georgetown University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Earley, J.E. A New ‘Idea of Nature’ for Chemical Education. Sci & Educ 22, 1775–1786 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9525-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9525-x