Skip to main content
Log in

A New ‘Idea of Nature’ for Chemical Education

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“The idea of nature” (general model of how things work) that is accepted in a society strongly influences that group’s social and technological progress. Currently, science education concentrates on analysis of stable pre-existing items to minimum constituents. This emphasis is consistent with an outlook that has been widely accepted since the late Renaissance—that characteristics of individuals depend exclusively on the properties of their microscopic components. Much of 19th and 20th century science seems compatible with that now-traditional outlook. But major parts of contemporary science (and fundamental technological problems) deal with open-system dynamic coherences that display novel and important characteristics. These important entities are not adequately treated by the presently-dominant idea of nature. In contrast, the notion of how the world works that contemporary science and current technological practice generate emphasizes synthesis and self-organization of far-from-equilibrium “dissipative structures.” Arguably, eventual success in meeting the severe technological and social challenges occasioned by increasing world population will require general diffusion and appreciation of that newer overall outlook. Chemistry educators have been important in developing and disseminating the earlier worldview—they can and should provide leadership for widespread adoption of the alternative idea of nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “And a century before Defoe [ca. 1660–1731], the English were beginning to learn from the Dutch the improving spirit of active, striving, laborious men such as will put their hand to the plow, try experiments, and give all their attention to what they are about.” This transition was also accompanied by a change in rhetoric: “It is a methodical and accounting rhetoric, tied to practical hope and courage, and foreign to the bold gestures in court and battlefield of an aristocratic society” (McCloskey 2010, pp. 367–368).

  2. Chemsystems.com reports that: “The world consumed over 600 million tons of feedstocks in 2009 in the production of … basic petrochemicals.… Total global feedstock consumption is projected to reach 1 billion tons [per year] by 2025.”

  3. Since the end of the Cold War had reduced the apparent military importance of high-energy physics, the US Congress cancelled its annual funding of the corresponding American experiment (The Superconducting Super Collider) in 1993—after more than two billion dollars had been spent on that project.

  4. Tom Stoppard’s prize-winning 1993 play Arcadia now leads in this regard.

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (2010). Sketch for a systematic metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnason, J., Eisenstadt, S., & Witt, B. (Eds.). (2005). Axial civilizations and world history. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Faith, brotherhood, and the (Un)making of terrorists. NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to pro-social religions. Biological Theory, 5(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R. (2002). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R. (2009). Idealization and modeling. Synthese, 169, 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., & Hacker, P. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (1994). Asymptotics, singularities and the reduction of theories. In D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, & D. Westerstahl (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy (Vol. IX, pp. 597–607). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., & Atmanspacher, H. (2006). Contextual emergence in the description of properties. Foundations of Physics, 36(12), 1753–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolender, J. (2010). The self-organizing social mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, T. (2010). Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. (2006). Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo-Devo. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., et al. (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cauvin, J. (2000). The birth of the gods and the origins of agriculture (trans: Watkins, T.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chaisson, E. (2006). Epic of evolution: Seven ages of the cosmos. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. (1945). The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human consciousness. NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (1996). An introductory course in modeling dynamic chemical and ecological systems. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(6), 526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (2003). Constraints on the origin of coherence in far-from-equilibrium chemical systems. In T. Eastman & H. Keeton (Eds.), Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, process and experience (pp. 63–73). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (2004). Would introductory chemistry courses work better with a new philosophical basis? Foundations of Chemistry, 6, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (2006). Chemical “substances” that are not “chemical substances”. Philosophy of Science, 73, 814–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (2008). Process structural realism, instance ontology, and societal order. In F. Riffert & H. Sander (Eds.), Researching with Whitehead: System and adventure (pp. 190–211). Berlin: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, J. (2012). A neglected aspect of the puzzle of chemical structure: How history helps. Foundations of Chemistry. doi:10.007/s 19698-012-9146-0.

  • Epstein, I., & Pojman, J. (1998). An introduction to nonlinear chemical dynamics: Oscillations, waves, patterns, and chaos. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. (2010). Catching up with the economy. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gare, A. (2010). Toward an ecological civilization: The science, ethics, and politics of eco-poesis. Process Studies, 39(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (2009). Why Europe? The rise of the West in world history, 1500–1850 (p. 120). NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. (2009). Powering the planet with solar fuel. Nature Chemistry, 1, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (2012). The swerve: How the world became modern. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J., & Tobin, K. (2009). The much exaggerated death of positivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondepudi, D., & Prigogine, I. (1998). Modern thermodynamics: From heat engines to dissipative structures. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. (2005). A different universe: Inventing physics from the bottom down. NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J., & Flannery, K. (2004). The coevolution of ritual and society: New 14C dates from ancient Mexico. PNAS (USA), 101(52), 18257–18261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. (1991). Chemical evolution: Origins of the elements, molecules, & living systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (2004). Reappraising positivism and education: The arguments of Philipp Frank and Herbert Feigl. Science & Education, 13, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. (2006). Wholes and parts: The limits of composition. South African Journal of Philosophy, 25(2), 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1959). Protocol sentences. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newth, D., & Finnigan, J. (2006). Emergence and self-organization in chemistry and biology. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 59, 841–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ney, A. (2009). Physical causation and difference-making. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 737–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H. (1998). Emergence in the exact natural sciences. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 91, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E., & Sagan, D. (2005). Into the cool: Energy flow, thermodynamics, and life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, G., & Feinberg, M. (2010). Structural sources of robustness in biological networks. Science, 327, 1389–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., & Morowitz, H. (2004). Universality in Intermediary Metabolism. PNAS (USA), 101(36), 13168–13173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. (1968). The second agricultural revolution, 1815–1880. The Economic History Review, 21, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. ([1926] 1967). Science and the modern world: Lowell lectures, 1925. NY: Free Press.

  • Whitehead, A. ([1929] 1978). Process and reality, Corrected edition, D. Griffin & D. Sherburne (Eds.). NY: Macmillan.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges a research grant from the Graduate School of Georgetown University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph E. Earley Sr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earley, J.E. A New ‘Idea of Nature’ for Chemical Education. Sci & Educ 22, 1775–1786 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9525-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9525-x

Keywords

Navigation