Skip to main content
Log in

Richard A. Richards: The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010, ISBN: 978-0-521-19683-3, x + 236 pages, price: $85

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Brower, A. V. Z. (2000). Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. Cladistics, 16, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher (Eds.), Endless forms: Species and speciation (pp. 57–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K. (1999). The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 49–89). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1997). The ideal species concept–and why we can’t get it. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, & M. R. Wilson (Eds.), Species: The units of biodiversity (pp. 357–380). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. In M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, & M. R. Wilson (Eds.), Species: The units of biodiversity (pp. 381–424). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R. L. (1999). Consilience and a hierarchy of species concepts: Advances toward closure on the species puzzle. Journal of Nematology, 31, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R. L. (2002). On biological species, species concepts and individuation in the natural world. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. ([1959] 1976). Typological versus population thinking. In E. Mayr (Ed.), Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays (pp. 26–29). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Reydon, T. A. C. (2005). On the nature of the species problem and the four meanings of ‘species’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. R. (1979). Buffon, German biology, and the historical interpretation of biological species. British Journal for the History of Science, 12, 109–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamos, D. (2003). The species problem. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos, D. (2007). Darwin and the nature of species. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary essentialism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Q. D., & Meier, R. (Eds.). (2000). Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: A debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Species: A history of the idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. S. (2011). Philosophically speaking, how many species concepts are there? Zootaxa, 2765, 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. C. Reydon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reydon, T.A.C. Richard A. Richards: The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis . Sci & Educ 22, 381–389 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9381-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9381-0

Navigation