Abstract
In this short paper we discuss Mario Bunge's definition of system boundary. It is quickly discovered that Bunge's definition of system and system boundary are both deficient. We thus propose new definitions, which (hopefully) improve the situation. Our definition of system boundary works off the same intuition behind Bunge's.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The arrows in this diagram are emphatically not representative of unidirectional patterns of influence between philosophical disciplines, but instead represent sequential fundamentality.
Bunge (1992).
Bunge (1992).
Bunge (1992).
Bunge (2001, p. 42).
It follows that a system x is open if its environment is closed. Note: a nonclosed system is not necessarily an open system.
References
Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution: Qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Bunge, M. (1974–1989). Treatise on basic philosophy. (Eight Volumes) Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Bunge, M. (1981). Scientific materialism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Bunge, M. (1992). System boundary. International Journal of General Systems, 20(3), 215–219.
Bunge, M. (2001). Philosophy in crisis. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Marquis, J.-P. (1996). A critical note on Bunge’s system boundary and a new proposal. International Journal of General Systems, 24(3), 245–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavallo, A.M. On Mario Bunge’s Definition of System and System Boundary. Sci & Educ 21, 1595–1599 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9365-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9365-0