Abstract.
In Modeling Theory in Science Education, Halloun (2004) adopts the word ‘paradigm’, but his use of the term is radically different from that of Kuhn. In this paper, I explore some of the differences between Kuhn’s paradigms and Halloun’s paradigms. Where Kuhn’s paradigms are public, community-defining exemplars of practice, Halloun’s paradigms are private, individualized ways of thinking. Where Kuhn writes of the paradigm shift as a revolutionary, vision-altering conversion experience, Halloun writes of a gradual evolution from one way of thinking to another and an easy back-and-forth switch between paradigms. Since Kuhn’s paradigms are self-enclosed and incommensurable, there is no objective standard by which one paradigm can be shown to be superior to the other. But Halloun uses ‘viability’ as a standard for paradigm choice. Underlying all of this is the more basic question of whether the history of science is an appropriate metaphor for student progress in the classroom. I conclude with some brief thoughts on this question.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arizona State University.: 2005, Modeling Instruction Program, from http://www.modeling.asu.edu/
Bachelard, G.: 1940/1968, The Philosophy of No: A Philosophy of the New Scientific Mind (G.C. Waterston, trans.), Orion Press, New York.
Caneva K.L. (2000) Possible Kuhns in the History of Science: Anomalies of Incommensurable Paradigms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31(1):87–124
Cedarbaum D.G. (1983) Paradigms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14(3):173–213
Duschl R.A., Hamilton R.J., Grandy R.E. (1992) Psychology and Epistemology: Match or Mismatch when Applied to Science Education?. In: Duschl R.A., Hamilton R.J. (eds) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 19–47
Halloun I. (1996a) Schematic Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33(9):1019–1041
Halloun I.: 1996b, Views About Science and Physics Achievement: The VASS Story, from http://www.modeling.la.asu.edu/R&E/Research.html
Halloun I. (1998) Schematic Concepts for Schematic Models of the Real World: The Newtonian Concept of Force. Science & Education 82(2):239–283
Halloun I. (2004) Modeling Theory in Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1987) Modeling Instruction in Mechanics. American Journal of Physics 55(5):455–462
Halloun I., Hestenes D. (1998) Interpreting VASS Dimensions and Profiles for Physics Students. Science & Education 7(6):553–577
Hestenes D. (1987) Toward a Modeling Theory of Physics Education. American Journal of Physics 55(5):440–454
Hestenes D.: 1996, Modeling Methodology for Physics Teachers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, College Park, MD.
Hewson P.W. (1981) A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science. European Journal of Science Education 3(4):383–396
Kuhn T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakatos I. & Musgrave A. (eds) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Masterman M. (1970) The Nature of a Paradigm. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 59–89
Matthews M.R. (1994) Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York
Matthews M.R. (2004) Thomas Kuhn’s Impact on Science Education: What Lessons can be Learned?. Science & Education 88(1):90–118
McDermott L.C. (1984) Research on Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics. Physics Today 37:24–32
McWhorter J.H. (2002) The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language. W. H. Freeman & Company, New York
Mortimer E.F. (1995) Conceptual Change or Conceptual Profile Change?. Science and Education 4(3):267–285
Piaget J. (1970) Genetic Epistemology (E. Duckworth, trans.). Columbia University Press, New York
Posner G.J., Strike K.A., Hewson P.W., Gertzog W.A. (1982) Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science & Education 66(2):211–227
Ryle G. (1949/1984) The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sharrock W., Read R. (2002) Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolution. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
Wells M., Hestenes D., Swackhamer G. (1995) A Modeling Method for High School Physics Instruction. American Journal of Physics 63(7):606–619
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wendel, P.J. Models and Paradigms in Kuhn and Halloun. Sci & Educ 17, 131–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9047-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9047-5