Abstract
This article articulates how a ‘grasp of practice’ serves as a reasoning resource for inquiry and citizenship abilities associated with nature of science (NOS) understanding. Theoretically, this resource is elaborated through an overlapping concern with ‘practice’ in two literatures, science studies and psychology of learning, bringing attention to two key roles in scientific practice, Critiquers and Constructors of claims. Empirically, this resource is made plausible by the results of an expert-novice study and a classroom study. In the expert-novice study, reactions of scientists and laypeople to science-related claims in the popular media were contrasted, underlining the appropriate ways scientists tend to Critique such claims. In the classroom study, sixth-grade students engaged in a 2-week ramp experiment, experiencing first hand the roles of Critiquers and Constructors of claims, and were subsequently assessed with a novel experimental task. Performances suggest that students had attained a grasp of practice, going well beyond mere execution of methods or procedures. These results challenge a common assumption that declarative knowledge best characterizes learning targets for supporting inquiry and NOS understanding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R.L., Lederman N.G. (1998) The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural. Science Education 82:417–436
American Association for The Advancement Of Science (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York
Bell R.L., Blair L.M., Crawford B.A., Lederman N.G. (2003) Just Do It? Impact of a Science Apprenticeship Program on High School Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(5):487–509
Bell R.L., Lederman N.G. (2003) Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making on Science and Technology Based Issues. Science Education 87:352–377
Bridgman P.W. (1936). The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Cartwright N. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chen Z., Klahr D. (1999). All Other Things Being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development 70(5):1098–1120
Cole M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
Drake S. (1973). Galileo’s Discovery of The Laws of Free Fall. Scientific American 228(5):84–92
Duschl R.A., Osborne J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education 38:39–72
Fodor J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Clarendon Press, New York
Ford, M. J.: (2005), 'The Game, the Pieces, and the Players: Generative Resources from Alternative Instructional Portrayal of Experimentation', The Journal of The Learning Sciences 14(4), 449–487.
Ford M.J., & Kniff, K.J.:2006, 'Groundwork for Progress Supporting Scientific Literacy: An Expert-Novice Study', Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, CA
Goldstein M., Goldstein I.F. (1978). How We Know: An Exploration of the Scientific Process. Plenum Press, New York
Greeno J.G. (1998). The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research. American Psychologist 53(1):5–26
Hacking I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hiebert J., Carpenter T.P., Fennema E., Fuson K., Human P., Murray H. (1996). Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics. Educational Researcher 25(4):12–21
Kelly G.J., Chen C., Crawford T. (1998) Methodological Considerations for Studying Science-in-the-Making in Educational Settings. Research in Science Education 28(1):23–49
Khishfe R., Abd-El-Khalick F. (2002). Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(7):551–578
Kitcher P. (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford Press, New York
Klahr D., Chen Z., Toth E.E. (2001) Cognitive Development and Science Education: Ships That Pass in the Night or Beacons of Mutual Illumination? In: Carver S., Klahr D. (eds). Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp. 75–119
Klahr D., Nigam M. (2004). The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning. Psychological Science 15(10):661–667
Kuhn T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago
Latour B. (1987). Science in Action. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, New York
Lederman N.G., Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R.L., Schwartz D.L. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(6):497–521
Linn M.C., Songer N.B. (1993). How Do Students Make Sense of Science?. Merrill-Palmer-Quarterly 39(1):47–73
Longino H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Machamer P., Osbeck L. (2003). Scientific Normativity as Non-Epistemic: A Hidden Kuhnian Legacy. Social Epistemology 17(1):3–11
Mayo D. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Mccomas W.F., Almazroa H., Clough M.P. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction. Science & Education 7:511–532
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Osborne J., Collins S., Ratcliffe M., Millar R., Duschl R.A. (2003). What Ideas-About-Science Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(7):692–720
Pera M. (1994). The Discourses of Science. The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Pickering A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Popper K. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (second revised edition). Harper & Row, New York
Popper K.R. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Reber A. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(3):219–235
Rogoff B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
Rouse J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward A Political Philosophy of Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Rouse J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Rutherford F.J., Ahlgren A. (1991). Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press, New York
Sandoval W.A., Morrison K. (2003). High School Students’ Ideas About Theories and Theory Change After a Biological Inquiry Unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(4):369–392
Saxe G.B. (1991). Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schwartz R.S., Lederman N.G., Crawford B.A. (2004). Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap Between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Science Education 88(4):610–645
Shamos M.H. (1995). The Myth of Scientific Literacy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ
Takahashi K. (1993). Galileo’s Labyrinth: His Struggle for Finding a Way Out of his Erroneous Law of Natural Fall Part I’. Historial Scientiarum 2(3):169–201
Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind In Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wertsch J. (1998). Mind As Action. Oxford University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, M. ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding. Sci & Educ 17, 147–177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7