Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article articulates how a ‘grasp of practice’ serves as a reasoning resource for inquiry and citizenship abilities associated with nature of science (NOS) understanding. Theoretically, this resource is elaborated through an overlapping concern with ‘practice’ in two literatures, science studies and psychology of learning, bringing attention to two key roles in scientific practice, Critiquers and Constructors of claims. Empirically, this resource is made plausible by the results of an expert-novice study and a classroom study. In the expert-novice study, reactions of scientists and laypeople to science-related claims in the popular media were contrasted, underlining the appropriate ways scientists tend to Critique such claims. In the classroom study, sixth-grade students engaged in a 2-week ramp experiment, experiencing first hand the roles of Critiquers and Constructors of claims, and were subsequently assessed with a novel experimental task. Performances suggest that students had attained a grasp of practice, going well beyond mere execution of methods or procedures. These results challenge a common assumption that declarative knowledge best characterizes learning targets for supporting inquiry and NOS understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R.L., Lederman N.G. (1998) The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural. Science Education 82:417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for The Advancement Of Science (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell R.L., Blair L.M., Crawford B.A., Lederman N.G. (2003) Just Do It? Impact of a Science Apprenticeship Program on High School Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(5):487–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell R.L., Lederman N.G. (2003) Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making on Science and Technology Based Issues. Science Education 87:352–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman P.W. (1936). The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z., Klahr D. (1999). All Other Things Being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development 70(5):1098–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake S. (1973). Galileo’s Discovery of The Laws of Free Fall. Scientific American 228(5):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl R.A., Osborne J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education 38:39–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Clarendon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. J.: (2005), 'The Game, the Pieces, and the Players: Generative Resources from Alternative Instructional Portrayal of Experimentation', The Journal of The Learning Sciences 14(4), 449–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford M.J., & Kniff, K.J.:2006, 'Groundwork for Progress Supporting Scientific Literacy: An Expert-Novice Study', Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M., Goldstein I.F. (1978). How We Know: An Exploration of the Scientific Process. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno J.G. (1998). The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research. American Psychologist 53(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert J., Carpenter T.P., Fennema E., Fuson K., Human P., Murray H. (1996). Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics. Educational Researcher 25(4):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G.J., Chen C., Crawford T. (1998) Methodological Considerations for Studying Science-in-the-Making in Educational Settings. Research in Science Education 28(1):23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe R., Abd-El-Khalick F. (2002). Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(7):551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr D., Chen Z., Toth E.E. (2001) Cognitive Development and Science Education: Ships That Pass in the Night or Beacons of Mutual Illumination? In: Carver S., Klahr D. (eds). Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp. 75–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr D., Nigam M. (2004). The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning. Psychological Science 15(10):661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. (1987). Science in Action. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman N.G., Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R.L., Schwartz D.L. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(6):497–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn M.C., Songer N.B. (1993). How Do Students Make Sense of Science?. Merrill-Palmer-Quarterly 39(1):47–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer P., Osbeck L. (2003). Scientific Normativity as Non-Epistemic: A Hidden Kuhnian Legacy. Social Epistemology 17(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo D. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccomas W.F., Almazroa H., Clough M.P. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction. Science & Education 7:511–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J., Collins S., Ratcliffe M., Millar R., Duschl R.A. (2003). What Ideas-About-Science Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(7):692–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pera M. (1994). The Discourses of Science. The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (second revised edition). Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K.R. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber A. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(3):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward A Political Philosophy of Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford F.J., Ahlgren A. (1991). Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval W.A., Morrison K. (2003). High School Students’ Ideas About Theories and Theory Change After a Biological Inquiry Unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(4):369–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe G.B. (1991). Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz R.S., Lederman N.G., Crawford B.A. (2004). Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap Between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Science Education 88(4):610–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamos M.H. (1995). The Myth of Scientific Literacy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K. (1993). Galileo’s Labyrinth: His Struggle for Finding a Way Out of his Erroneous Law of Natural Fall Part I’. Historial Scientiarum 2(3):169–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind In Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch J. (1998). Mind As Action. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Ford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ford, M. ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding. Sci & Educ 17, 147–177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7

Keywords

Navigation