Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A theoretical model of values and behaviors that shape technology region emergence in developing contexts

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research on emerging cluster regions often focuses on infrastructure that is needed to create these regions at the macro-economic level, with minimal consideration of the micro-level human factors that drive these regions. In this study, we develop a theoretical model of micro-level behaviors—that is individual level—that are needed within regions to produce the knowledge, entrepreneurial, and market making functions of innovation systems. Our core argument is that it is through a critical mass of individuals with these behaviors, that an innovation system that supports technology regions will emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavan, P., & Hosseini, S. M. (2015). Determinants of knowledge sharing in knowledge networks: a social capital perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertini, S. (1999). Networking and division of labour–The case of industrial districts in the North–East of Italy. Human Systems Management, 18(2), 107–115.

  • Anderson, C. A. (1983). Imagination and expectation: the effect of imagining behavioral scripts on personal intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appold, S. (1998). Labor-market imperfections and the agglomeration of firms: evidence from the emergent period of the US semiconductor industry. Environment and Planning A, 30(3), 439–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H. (2002). The re-emergence of a media industry cluster in Leipzig. European Planning Studies, 10(5), 583–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M. (1996). Innovation and change in the Marshallian Industrial District. European Planning Studies, 4(3), 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. J. (1992). The operation of intentions in time: the emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, D. L., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument. Education+ Training, 54(2/3), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40–57.

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). The rise of the network society, the information age: economy, society and culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2005). From theory to practice: the use of systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, M. (1999). The rise and fall of an enterprise cluster in Africa: the jewelry industry in South Africa. South African Geographical Journal., 81(3), 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., & Iammarino, S. (2010). The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. H., & Weaver, K. M. (2008). The role of the institutional environment in determining firm orientations towards entrepreneurial behavior. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, M. A. (2001). The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: towards a participatory approach. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 907–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, J. R. (2003). Hannover after the world exhibition EXPO 2000 - an attempt to establish an ICT-cluster. European Planning Studies, 11(4), 379–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilaver, O., Bleda, M., & Uyarra, E. (2014). Entrepreneurship and the emergence of industrial clusters. Complexity, 19(6), 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohse, D., & Soltwedel, R. (2006). Recent developments in the research on innovative clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(9), 1167–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbekink, M., & Lagendijk, A. (2013). What's next in researching cluster policy: Place-based governance for effective cluster policy. European Planning Studies, 21(5), 735–753.

  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., & Francis, J. L. (2003). Fortune favours the prepared region: the case of entrepreneurship and the capitol region biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 11(7), 765–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, D., Wong, P.-K., & Cheah, T.-C. (2004). Adapting a foreign direct investment strategy to the knowledge economy: the case of Singapore’s emerging biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 921–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: the four elementary forms of human relations: communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D., Hassink, R., & Menzel, M.-P. (2015). Broadening our knowledge on cluster evolution. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1016654.

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B.A. (2017). Agglomerations, Industrial Districts and Industry Clusters: Trends of the 21st Century. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 1–80.

  • Gilbert, B. A., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Stadler, M., & Wüstenberg, S. (2015). Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 356–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, B., & Guo, J.-J. (2011). Patterns of technological learning within knowledge systems of industrial clusters in emerging economies: evidence from China. Technovation, 31(87–104).

  • Halliru, M. (2013). The effect of culture on the development of entrepreneurs among the Hausa ethnic group in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Marketing & Management, 4(1), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, W., & Wei, K. (2009). What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and-seeking beliefs. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 826–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henn, S. (2013). Transnational entrepreneurs and the emergence of clusters in peripheral regions. The case of the diamond cutting cluster in Gujarat. European Planning Studies, 21(11), 1779–1795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herl, H. E., Oneil, H. F., Jr., Chung, G. K. W. K., Bianchi, C., Wang, S.-L., Mayer, R., Lee, C. Y., Choi, A., Suen, T., & Tu, A. (1999). Final report for validation of problem-solving measures. CSE Technical Report, 501.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, C., & Stephan, U. (2012). The influence of socio-cultural environments on the performance of nascent entrepreneurs: community culture, motivation, self-efficacy and startup-success. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9), 917–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D. A., & Smith, J. K. (1988). Science and corporate strategy: Dupont R and D, 1902-1980 Cambridge University Press: New York.

  • Hung, S., Durcikova, A., Lai, H., & Lin, W. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, A. (2011). “Cluster” creation by reconfiguring communities of practice. European Planning Studies, 19(5), 753–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov, E. (2010). Why every cluster cannot be a successful community? European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1445–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4), 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, A. (2002). Conditions for the development of high-tech industry: the case of Israel. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(3), 270–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketels, C., Lindqvist, G., & Sölvell, Ö. (2006). Cluster initiatives in developing and transition economies. Stockholm: Center for Strategy and Competitiveness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-T. (2015). Regional advantage of cluster development: a case study of the San Diego biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 238–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220–237). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies, 2nd Edition (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2016). Industrial upgrading and innovation capability for inclusive growth: lessons from East Asia. In A. Foxley & B. Stallings (Eds.), Innovation and inclusion in Latin America: strategies to avoid the middle income trap (pp. 59–88). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., & Sinha, D. K. (1993). Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1125–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2005). Learning from users for radical innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1989). Cross-cultural differences: individual-level vs. culture-level analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 703–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: the strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 545–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 596–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: an introductory volume. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, I., Courpasson, D., & Barbosa, S. D. (2013). Living in the fishbowl. Generating an entrepreneurial culture in a local community in Argentina. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York: Macmill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossig, I. (2004). The networks producing television programmes in the Cologne media cluster: new firm foundation, flexible specialization and efficient decision-making structures. European Planning Studies, 12(2), 155–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S., & Thomas, A. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: a nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, M., & Cornwall, J. R. (2010). Culture as the basis of the good entrepreneur. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 1(1), 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntseane, P. (2004). Being a female entrepreneur in Botswana: cultures, values, values, strategies for success. Gender and Development, 12(2), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohoata, I., Clipa, R. I., & Iacobuta, A. O. (2013). The local culture - entrepreneurship relation in the equation of agglomeration economies. Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala, 43, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, N., & Heiduk, G. (2002). Silicon Valley’s innovative milieu: a cultural mix of entrepreneurs/an entrepreneurial mix of cultures? Experiences of European firms. Erdkunde, 56(3), 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R., & John, C. H. S. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabellotti, R. (1995). Is there an “industrial district model”? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared. World Development, 23(1), 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabellotti, R., & Schmitz, H. (1999). The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico. Regional Studies, 33(2), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M., & Li, X. (2009). Learning and sharing in a Chinese high-technology cluster: as study of inter-firm and intra-firm knowledge flows between R&D employees. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(3), 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E., & Khessina, O. M. (2005). Regional industrial identity: cluster configurations and economic development. Organization Science, 16(4), 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1994). Scientific instrumentation and university research. In Exploring the black box. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S. A. (2003). Expanding opportunities: cluster strategies that reach more people and more places. European Planning Studies, 11(4), 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagie, A., Elizur, D., & Yamauchi, H. (1996). The structure and strength of achievement motivation: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(5), 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage. Boston: Harvard University Press.

  • Schaper, M., Volery, T., Weber, P., & Lewis, K. (2010). Entrepreneurship and small business. Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, C. B., & Romanelli, E. (2001). The entrepreneurship dynamic: origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. (1995). Small shoemakers and Fordist giants: tale of a supercluster. World Development, 23(1), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). Newbury.

  • Senor, D., & Singer, S. (2009). Startup nation: the story of Israel’s economic miracle. New York: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: the emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shook, C. L., Priem, R. L., & McGee, J. E. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: a review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 29(3), 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, B. (2016). Innovation, inclusion, and institutions: east asian lessons for Latin America. In: A. Foxley (Ed.), Innovation and inclusion: strategies to avoid the middle income trap in Latin America (pp. 1-32). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: a cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., & Litzenberger, T. (2004). Regional clusters in Germany - their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 767–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L., & March, J. G. (1965). Social structure and organizations. Handbook of organizations, 7, 142–193.

  • Sydow, J., Lerch, F., & Staber, U. (2010). Planning for path dependence? The case of a network in the Berlin-Brandenburg optics cluster. Economic Geography, 86(2), 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3(1), 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M. L., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: an exploratory study. Human Relations, 59(10), 1343–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, P., Oort, F. V., Wiegmans, B., & Spit, T. (2003). European corridors as carriers of dynamic agglomeration externalities? European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2326–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., & Jackson, R. (2011). Regional innovation clusters: a critical review. Growth and Change, 42(2), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., Seifert, C. F., & Chavez, C. (2008). Validation of the extended influence behavior questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the generous support of the Rutgers Advanced Institute for the Study of Entrepreneurial Development (RAISED). Any errors in the manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett Anitra Gilbert.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilbert, B.A., Li, Y., Velez-Calle, A. et al. A theoretical model of values and behaviors that shape technology region emergence in developing contexts. Small Bus Econ 55, 179–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00137-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00137-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation