Abstract
This paper investigates whether a high level of new business formation in a region stimulates employment growth in that region. We look at the lag structure of these effects using a data set covering a fairly large time span (1982–2002). We find that indirect effects of new firm births on subsequent employment growth are stronger than direct effects. However, indirect effects only occur about 8 years after new firm formation. In particular, and unlike the findings from studies of other countries using a similar approach, positive indirect effects do not seem to tail off in the Portuguese case. This is likely due to a general pattern of results in which lags appear to be longer for Portugal. In view of these results, we suggest that the lag times and magnitudes the effects on new firm formation on subsequent employment growth are likely dependent on the types and qualities of start-ups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The database is property of the Portuguese government and can be accessed on-site at the Observatory of the Ministry of Labour and Social Solidarity. The database is presented in more detail in Escária and Madruga (2002).
Start-ups do include new branch plants by existing firms, so all new establishments are included. NACE A and NACE B (agriculture, hunting and forestry; and fisheries) are excluded— so we have all new establishments in manufacturing and services.
Fritsch and Mueller (2004) use data for 326 West German districts (kreise).
Calculated from the sector-adjusted number of start-ups—see Eq. 3—using the labour market approach.
The control variable was found not to be statistically significant in most regressions. Estimations were also carried out using each of the two variables—population density and per capita GDP—separately, reaching similar results.
Coefficients for time dummies were mostly significant. Results are not reported here but are available from the authors upon request.
Huber-White-Sandwich robust estimation takes into account variations in employment growth within and between regions over time simultaneously, being therefore preferable to fixed effects estimation.
Results for other lag structures are available from the authors upon request.
The lag structures for lower order polynomials are all approximately u-shaped.
References
Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). ‘Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities, Discussion Paper on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy #13/2004, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena.
Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Susanne, P. (2004). Entry and productivity growth: Evidence from microlevel panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 265–276.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, L., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (1995). New directions in spatial econometrics: Introduction. In L. Anselin & R. J. G. M. Florax (Eds.), New directions in spatial econometrics. Berlin: Springer.
Ashcroft, B., Love, J. H., & Malloy, E. (1991). New firm formation in the British Counties with special reference to Scotland. Regional Studies, 25, 395–409.
Ashcroft, B., & Love, J. H. (1996). Firm births and employment change in the British Counties: 1981–89. Papers in Regional Science, 75, 483–500
Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica, 21, 105–113 July.
Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.
Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 17–34.
Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 795–821.
Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 321–324.
Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2005). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public Policy #07/2005. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.
Baptista, R., & Preto, M. T. (2006). Entrepreneurship and industrial re-structuring: What kinds of start-ups matter most for job creation? Paper presented at the 3rd Hellenic workshop on efficiency and productivity, University of Patras, Greece, June.
Baptista, R., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2006) Entrepreneurship, industrial re-structuring and unemployment in Portugal. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation: The dynamics of firms and industries. international studies in entrepreneurship, Springer Verlag.
Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 1–31.
Brixy, U., & Grotz, R. (2004). Entry rates, the share of surviving businesses and employment growth: Differences of the economic performance of newly founded firms in West and East Germany. In M. Dowling, J. Schmude, & D. Knyphausen-Aufsess (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary european entrepreneurship research. Muenster: Lit.
Carlsson, B. (1989). The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 21–37.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Research Policy, 24, 233–257.
Escária, V., & Madruga, P. (2002). The construction of a longitudinal matched employer-employee microdata data set, Mimeo, CIRIUS, ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon.
Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Foelster, S. (2000). Do entrepreneurs create jobs? Small Business Economics, 14, 137–148.
Fritsch, M. (1996). Turbulence and growth in West Germany: A comparison of evidence by regions and industries. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 231–251.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.
Fritsch, M., & Weyh, A. (2006). How large are the direct employment effects of new businesses? An empirical investigation for West Germany. Small Business Economics, 27, 245–260.
Garofoli, G. (1994). New firm formation and regional development: The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 28, 381–393.
Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.
Johnson, P., & Parker, S. (1996). Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Regional Studies, 30, 679–688.
Mata, J., Portugal, P., & Guimarães, P. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 459–481.
Mueller, P., van Stel, A. J., & David, J. S. (2007). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, present issue.
Piore, M. J., & Charles, S. S. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
Reynolds, P. D. (1994). Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–90. Regional Studies, 27, 429–442.
Reynolds, P. D. (1999). Creative destruction: Source or symptom of economic growth? In Z. Acs, B. Carlsson, & C. Karlsson (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, small and medium-sized enterprises and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.
van Stel, A. J., & David, J. S. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there an Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.
Storey, D. J. (1991). The birth of new firms – does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3, 167–178.
Trivedi, P. K. (1978). Estimation of a distributed lag model under quadratic loss. Econometrica, 46(5), 1181–1183.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Audretsch, Michael Fritsch, Pamela Mueller, André van Stel, David Storey, A. Roy Thurik, and participants at the 2005 IECER Conference at the University of Amsterdam, as well as at the Workshop on Long Term Effects of New Business Formation at the Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, July 2005. Rui Baptista gratefully acknowledges support from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baptista, R., Escária, V. & Madruga, P. Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small Bus Econ 30, 49–58 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0