Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates whether a high level of new business formation in a region stimulates employment growth in that region. We look at the lag structure of these effects using a data set covering a fairly large time span (1982–2002). We find that indirect effects of new firm births on subsequent employment growth are stronger than direct effects. However, indirect effects only occur about 8 years after new firm formation. In particular, and unlike the findings from studies of other countries using a similar approach, positive indirect effects do not seem to tail off in the Portuguese case. This is likely due to a general pattern of results in which lags appear to be longer for Portugal. In view of these results, we suggest that the lag times and magnitudes the effects on new firm formation on subsequent employment growth are likely dependent on the types and qualities of start-ups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The database is property of the Portuguese government and can be accessed on-site at the Observatory of the Ministry of Labour and Social Solidarity. The database is presented in more detail in Escária and Madruga (2002).

  2. Start-ups do include new branch plants by existing firms, so all new establishments are included. NACE A and NACE B (agriculture, hunting and forestry; and fisheries) are excluded— so we have all new establishments in manufacturing and services.

  3. Fritsch and Mueller (2004) use data for 326 West German districts (kreise).

  4. Calculated from the sector-adjusted number of start-ups—see Eq. 3—using the labour market approach.

  5. The control variable was found not to be statistically significant in most regressions. Estimations were also carried out using each of the two variables—population density and per capita GDP—separately, reaching similar results.

  6. Coefficients for time dummies were mostly significant. Results are not reported here but are available from the authors upon request.

  7. Huber-White-Sandwich robust estimation takes into account variations in employment growth within and between regions over time simultaneously, being therefore preferable to fixed effects estimation.

  8. Results for other lag structures are available from the authors upon request.

  9. The lag structures for lower order polynomials are all approximately u-shaped.

References

  • Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). ‘Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities, Discussion Paper on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy #13/2004, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena.

  • Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Susanne, P. (2004). Entry and productivity growth: Evidence from microlevel panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (1995). New directions in spatial econometrics: Introduction. In L. Anselin & R. J. G. M. Florax (Eds.), New directions in spatial econometrics. Berlin: Springer.

  • Ashcroft, B., Love, J. H., & Malloy, E. (1991). New firm formation in the British Counties with special reference to Scotland. Regional Studies, 25, 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, B., & Love, J. H. (1996). Firm births and employment change in the British Counties: 1981–89. Papers in Regional Science, 75, 483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica, 21, 105–113 July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 795–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2005). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public Policy #07/2005. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  • Baptista, R., & Preto, M. T. (2006). Entrepreneurship and industrial re-structuring: What kinds of start-ups matter most for job creation? Paper presented at the 3rd Hellenic workshop on efficiency and productivity, University of Patras, Greece, June.

  • Baptista, R., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2006) Entrepreneurship, industrial re-structuring and unemployment in Portugal. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation: The dynamics of firms and industries. international studies in entrepreneurship, Springer Verlag.

  • Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixy, U., & Grotz, R. (2004). Entry rates, the share of surviving businesses and employment growth: Differences of the economic performance of newly founded firms in West and East Germany. In M. Dowling, J. Schmude, & D. Knyphausen-Aufsess (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary european entrepreneurship research. Muenster: Lit.

  • Carlsson, B. (1989). The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Research Policy, 24, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escária, V., & Madruga, P. (2002). The construction of a longitudinal matched employer-employee microdata data set, Mimeo, CIRIUS, ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon.

  • Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foelster, S. (2000). Do entrepreneurs create jobs? Small Business Economics, 14, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (1996). Turbulence and growth in West Germany: A comparison of evidence by regions and industries. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Weyh, A. (2006). How large are the direct employment effects of new businesses? An empirical investigation for West Germany. Small Business Economics, 27, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofoli, G. (1994). New firm formation and regional development: The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 28, 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Parker, S. (1996). Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Regional Studies, 30, 679–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., Portugal, P., & Guimarães, P. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P., van Stel, A. J., & David, J. S. (2007). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, present issue.

  • Piore, M. J., & Charles, S. S. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1994). Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–90. Regional Studies, 27, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1999). Creative destruction: Source or symptom of economic growth? In Z. Acs, B. Carlsson, & C. Karlsson (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, small and medium-sized enterprises and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stel, A. J., & David, J. S. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there an Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. (1991). The birth of new firms – does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, P. K. (1978). Estimation of a distributed lag model under quadratic loss. Econometrica, 46(5), 1181–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Audretsch, Michael Fritsch, Pamela Mueller, André van Stel, David Storey, A. Roy Thurik, and participants at the 2005 IECER Conference at the University of Amsterdam, as well as at the Workshop on Long Term Effects of New Business Formation at the Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, July 2005. Rui Baptista gratefully acknowledges support from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Baptista.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baptista, R., Escária, V. & Madruga, P. Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small Bus Econ 30, 49–58 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation