Skip to main content
Log in

From Young Children’s Ideas about Germs to Ideas Shaping a Learning Environment

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with highlighting young children’s ideas about the nature, location and appearance of germs, as well as their reasoning strands about germs’ ontological category and biological functions. Moreover, it is concerned with exploring how all these could be taken into account for shaping a potentially fruitful learning environment. Conducting individual, semi-structured interviews with 35 preschoolers (age 4.5–5.5) of public kindergartens in the broader area of Patras, we attempted to trace their ideas about what germs are, where they may be found, whether they are good or bad and living or non-living and how they might look like in a drawing. Moreover, children were required to attribute a series of biological functions to dogs, chairs and germs, and finally to create a story with germs holding a key-role. The analysis of our qualitative data within the “NVivo” software showed that the informants make a strong association of germs with health and hygiene issues, locate germs mostly in our body and the external environment, are not familiar with the ‘good germs’-idea, and draw germs as ‘human-like’, ‘animal-like’ or ‘abstract’ entities. Moreover, they have significant difficulties not only in employing biological functions as criteria for classifying germs in the category of ‘living’, but also in just attributing such functions to germs using a warrant. Finally, the shift from our findings to a 3-part learning environment aiming at supporting preschoolers in refining their initial conceptualization of germs is thoroughly discussed in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandiera, M. (2007). Micro-organisms: Everyday knowledge predates and contrasts with school knowledge. In R. Pintó & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 213–224). Springer: Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., Grace, M., & Hanley, P. (2008). Children’s anthropomorphic and anthropocentric ideas about micro-organisms: Do they affect learning? (Paper presented at the 7th ERIDOB Conference, Zeist - Utrecht, The Netherlands).

  • Carey, S. (1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 268–302). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science Education (http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/).

  • Ergazaki, M., Saltapida, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Young children’s reasoning about germs and their ontological status. Paper presented at the ERIDOB 2008 Conference, September 16–20, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Gelman et al. (1986). Inferring properties from categories versus inferring categories from properties: the case of gender. Child Development, 57(2), 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky & education (pp. 349–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilge, C., & Kattmann, U. (2003). The significance of microbes for biology teaching—A study of scientific and students’ conception. (Paper presented at the 4th ESERA Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands).

  • Hőrsch, C., & Kattmann, U. (2004) Micro-organisms and microbial processes in the human body—A contribution to educational reconstruction. (Paper presented at the 5th ERIDOB Conference, Patras, Greece).

  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children’s conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(4), 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann, U. (2008). Learning biology by means of anthropomorphic conceptions? In M. Hammann, M. Reiss, C. Boulter & S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), Biology in context: Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century (pp. 7–17). London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirsschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. (1990). Vygotsky and education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, M. (1953). The representation of germs by children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83(2), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2002). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel: Leibniz Institute for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen & W. Kessen (Eds.), Handbook of child development (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 103–128). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravanis, K., & Bagakis, G. (1998). Science education in kindergarten: sociocognitive perspective. International Journal Of Early Years Education, 6(3), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmoneaux, L. (2000). A study of pupils’ conceptions and reasoning in connection with ‘microbes’, as a contribution to research in biotechnology education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. E. A., & Cassimatis, N. L. (1999). On facts and conceptual systems: young children’s integration of their understandings of germs and contagion. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. E. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2000). Conceptual change in the classroom: teaching young children to understand biological inheritance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsy, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, et al. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M., & Binnie, L. M. (2002). Children’s concepts of illness: an intervention to improve knowledge. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zogza, V. (2007). The biological knowledge in childhood: Children’s ideas and didactic approaches. Athens, Greece: Metaixmio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zogza, V., & Papamichael, Y. (2000). The development of the concept of alive by preschoolers through a cognitive conflict teaching intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(2), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the young learners who participated in the study, as well as their teachers who actually made this participation possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marida Ergazaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ergazaki, M., Saltapida, K. & Zogza, V. From Young Children’s Ideas about Germs to Ideas Shaping a Learning Environment. Res Sci Educ 40, 699–715 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9140-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9140-2

Keywords

Navigation