Abstract
This article reports the effects of program characteristics and faculty activities on students’ experiences and, ultimately, the development of students’ analytical and group skills. Data come from nationally representative samples of 4,330 seniors, 1,243 faculty members, and 147 engineering program chairs on 40 campuses nationwide. Findings indicate that program characteristics and faculty behaviors and values have significant, if relatively small and largely indirect, effects on student learning by encouraging (or discouraging) certain kinds of student experiences, which, in turn, influence student learning. The results point to a need for more complex designs than are typically adopted in most learning outcomes studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing Data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Anaya, G. (1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education 40: 499–526.
Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In: Costner, H. (ed.), Sociological methodology: 1973–1974. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 17–50.
Astin A. (1993) What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Astin A., Scherrei R. (1980). Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Belfield C .R., Thomas H. R. (2000). The relationship between resources and performance in further education colleges. Oxford Review of Education 26:239–253
Berger J. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact. Review of Higher Education 23:177–198
Berger J. B. (2001–2002). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention 3:3–21
Berger J. (2002). The influence of the organizational structures of colleges and universities on college student learning. Peabody Journal of Education 77:40–59
Berger J., Milem J. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In: Smart J. C. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon, New York, pp. 268–338
Braxton J., Brier E. (1989). Melding organizational and interactional theories of student attrition: A path analytic study. Review of Higher Education 13:47–61
Bradburn, N. M., and Sudman, S. (1988). Polls and surveys: Understanding what they tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Converse, J. M., and Presser, S. (1989). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dey E., Hurtado S., Rhee B., Inkelas K.K., Wimsatt L.A., Guan F. (1997) Improving Research on Postsecondary Outcomes: A Review of the Strengths and Limitations of National Data Sources. Stanford University, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Palo Alto, CA
Engineering Accreditation Commission. (1998) Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States (2nd ed.). Engineering Accreditation commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore
Ethington C. A. (1997) A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In: Smart J. C. (ed) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon, New York, pp 165–194
Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., O'Day, P. T., and Kuh, G. D. (2002). Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students. Journal of College Student Development 43(5): 643–663.
Kuh G. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change 33:10–17, 66
Laing, J., Sawyer, R., and Noble, J. (1998). Accuracy of self-reported activities and accomplishments of collegebound seniors. Journal of College Student Development 29(4): 362–368.
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., and Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000, Final Report. Baltimore: ABET
Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles: University of California, The Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education.
Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students (Vol. 2): A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Pascarella E. T., Cruce T., Umbach P. D., Wolniak G. C., Kuh G. D., Carini R. M., Hayek J. C., Gonyea R. M., Zhao C. (2006) Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link? Journal of Higher Education, 77(2):251–285
Pascarella E., Whitt E., Nora A., Edison M., Hagedorn L., Terenzini P. (1996). What have we learned from the first year of the national study of student learning? Journal of College Student Development 37:182–192
Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education 36(1): 1–22.
Porter S.R. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education 47: 521–558
Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., and Domingo R. J. Developing social and personal competence in the first year of college. Review of Higher Education (in press)
Reason R.D., Terenzini P.T., Domingo R.J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education 47(2):149–175
Ryan J. F. (2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges. Research in Higher Education 45(2):97–114
Smart J., Hamm R. (1993). Organizational culture and effectiveness in two-year colleges. Research in Higher Education 34:95–106
Smart J., Ethington C., Riggs R., Thompson M. (2002) Influences of institutional expenditure patterns on the development of students’ leadership competencies. Research in Higher Education 43(1):115–132
Springer L., Terenzini P., Pascarella E., Nora A. (1995). Influences on college students’ orientations toward learning forself-understanding. Journal of College Student Development 36:5–18
Strauss, L. C., and Terenzini, P. T. (2005). Assessing student performance on EC2000 Criterion 3.a-k. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 11–14
Terenzini P., Springer L., Pascarella E., Nora A. (1995). Academic and out-of-class influences affecting the development of students’ intellectual orientations. Review of Higher Education 19:23–44
Titus M. A. (2006). Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education 47:371–398
Toutkoushian R., Smart J. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect gains from college? The Review of Higher Education 25(1):39–61
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Accrediting Board of Engineering and Engineering Technology (ABET). The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of ABET, and no official endorsement should be inferred. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the members of the research team who participated in the development of the design, instruments, and databases for this project: Dr. J. Fredericks Volkwein, co-PI; Dr. Linda C. Strauss, senior project associate; Vicki L. Baker, Robert J. Domingo, Betty J. Harper, Javzan Sukhbaatar, graduate research assistants; and Suzanne Bienart, project assistant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, May 16, 2006, Chicago, IL.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambert, A.D., Terenzini, P.T. & Lattuca, L.R. More than meets the eye: Curricular and Programmatic Effects on Student Learning. Res High Educ 48, 141–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9040-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9040-5