Skip to main content
Log in

More than meets the eye: Curricular and Programmatic Effects on Student Learning

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports the effects of program characteristics and faculty activities on students’ experiences and, ultimately, the development of students’ analytical and group skills. Data come from nationally representative samples of 4,330 seniors, 1,243 faculty members, and 147 engineering program chairs on 40 campuses nationwide. Findings indicate that program characteristics and faculty behaviors and values have significant, if relatively small and largely indirect, effects on student learning by encouraging (or discouraging) certain kinds of student experiences, which, in turn, influence student learning. The results point to a need for more complex designs than are typically adopted in most learning outcomes studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing Data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  • Anaya, G. (1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education 40: 499–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In: Costner, H. (ed.), Sociological methodology: 1973–1974. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin A. (1993) What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin A., Scherrei R. (1980). Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfield C .R., Thomas H. R. (2000). The relationship between resources and performance in further education colleges. Oxford Review of Education 26:239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact. Review of Higher Education 23:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. B. (2001–2002). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention 3:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. (2002). The influence of the organizational structures of colleges and universities on college student learning. Peabody Journal of Education 77:40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J., Milem J. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In: Smart J. C. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon, New York, pp. 268–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton J., Brier E. (1989). Melding organizational and interactional theories of student attrition: A path analytic study. Review of Higher Education 13:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M., and Sudman, S. (1988). Polls and surveys: Understanding what they tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Converse, J. M., and Presser, S. (1989). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Dey E., Hurtado S., Rhee B., Inkelas K.K., Wimsatt L.A., Guan F. (1997) Improving Research on Postsecondary Outcomes: A Review of the Strengths and Limitations of National Data Sources. Stanford University, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Accreditation Commission. (1998) Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States (2nd ed.). Engineering Accreditation commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethington C. A. (1997) A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In: Smart J. C. (ed) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon, New York, pp 165–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., O'Day, P. T., and Kuh, G. D. (2002). Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students. Journal of College Student Development 43(5): 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh G. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. Change 33:10–17, 66

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J., Sawyer, R., and Noble, J. (1998). Accuracy of self-reported activities and accomplishments of collegebound seniors. Journal of College Student Development 29(4): 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., and Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000, Final Report. Baltimore: ABET

  • Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles: University of California, The Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education.

  • Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students (Vol. 2): A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella E. T., Cruce T., Umbach P. D., Wolniak G. C., Kuh G. D., Carini R. M., Hayek J. C., Gonyea R. M., Zhao C. (2006) Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link? Journal of Higher Education, 77(2):251–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella E., Whitt E., Nora A., Edison M., Hagedorn L., Terenzini P. (1996). What have we learned from the first year of the national study of student learning? Journal of College Student Development 37:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education 36(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter S.R. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education 47: 521–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., and Domingo R. J. Developing social and personal competence in the first year of college. Review of Higher Education (in press)

  • Reason R.D., Terenzini P.T., Domingo R.J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education 47(2):149–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan J. F. (2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges. Research in Higher Education 45(2):97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart J., Hamm R. (1993). Organizational culture and effectiveness in two-year colleges. Research in Higher Education 34:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart J., Ethington C., Riggs R., Thompson M. (2002) Influences of institutional expenditure patterns on the development of students’ leadership competencies. Research in Higher Education 43(1):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer L., Terenzini P., Pascarella E., Nora A. (1995). Influences on college students’ orientations toward learning forself-understanding. Journal of College Student Development 36:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. C., and Terenzini, P. T. (2005). Assessing student performance on EC2000 Criterion 3.a-k. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 11–14

  • Terenzini P., Springer L., Pascarella E., Nora A. (1995). Academic and out-of-class influences affecting the development of students’ intellectual orientations. Review of Higher Education 19:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus M. A. (2006). Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education 47:371–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian R., Smart J. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect gains from college? The Review of Higher Education 25(1):39–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Accrediting Board of Engineering and Engineering Technology (ABET). The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of ABET, and no official endorsement should be inferred. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the members of the research team who participated in the development of the design, instruments, and databases for this project: Dr. J. Fredericks Volkwein, co-PI; Dr. Linda C. Strauss, senior project associate; Vicki L. Baker, Robert J. Domingo, Betty J. Harper, Javzan Sukhbaatar, graduate research assistants; and Suzanne Bienart, project assistant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber D. Lambert.

Additional information

Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, May 16, 2006, Chicago, IL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, A.D., Terenzini, P.T. & Lattuca, L.R. More than meets the eye: Curricular and Programmatic Effects on Student Learning. Res High Educ 48, 141–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9040-5

Key words

Navigation