Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shortcomings of current fish transfer functions and a proposal for a new transfer function

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One important component of almost all theoretical models in fishery is a fish transfer function. However, most of the current fish transfer functions have significant shortcomings. This paper contributes to the literature on fishery management by (1) showing some of shortcomings of commonly used fish transfer functions and proposing a new fish transfer function that is more appropriate to model net amount of fish transfer from one marine area to another; and (2) applying the proposed transfer function in an optimal harvest problem to assess the economic payoff from a switching reserve versus a fixed marine reserve. The findings indicate that a switching marine reserve appears to provide fishers with higher economic benefits than a fixed marine reserve. The payoff gain from a switching reserve appears to increase when the fish move less because of bio-ecological and territorial factors that impede the fish dispersal between marine areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery investigations, Ser 2, vol 19. UK Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, 533 pp

  • Bhat M (2003) Application of non-market valuation to the Florida keys marine reserve management. J Environ Manage 67:315–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber L, Botsford L, Hastings A, Possingham H, Gaines S, Palumbi S, Andelman S (2003) Population models for marine reserve design: a retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecol Appl 13:S47–S64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton Q, Kompas T, Ha PV (2006) The economic payoffs from marine reserves: resource rents in a stochastic environment. Econ Rec 82:469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasting A (1982) Dynamics of a single species in a spatially varying habitat: the stabilizing role of high dispersal rates. J Math Biol 16:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasting A (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal. Theor Pop Biol 24:244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Botsford L (2003) Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and biodiversity. Ecol Appl 13:S65–S70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Walters C (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Kluwer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland D, Brazee R (1996) Marine reserves for fisheries management. Marine Resour Econ 11:157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt R (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor Pop Biol 28:181–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer D, Chapman M (1999) Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function. Environ Biol Fish 55:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1976) Population dynamic models in heterogenous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:287–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCall A (1990) Dynamic geography of marine fish populations. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda M, Fackler P (2002) Applied computational economics and finance. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek T (1990) Year around closed areas as a management tool. Natural Res Model 4:327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C, Bohnsack J, Gell F, Hawkins J, Goodridge R (2001) Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294:1920–1923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchiroco J (2004) Designing a cost-effective marine reserve network: a bioeconomic metapopulation analysis. Marine Resource Econ 19:46–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchiroco J, Wilen J (1999) Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. J Environ Econ Manage 37:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchiroco J, Wilen J (2001) A bioeconomic model of marine reserve creation. J Environ Econ Manage 42:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchiroco J, Wilen J (2002) The impacts of marine reserves on limited-entry fisheries. Natural Res Model 15:340–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1955) The fishery: the objectives of sole ownership. J Political Econ 63:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Wilen J (2003) Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behaviour. J Environ Econ Manage 46:183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance R (1984) The effects of dispersal on population stability in one-species, discrete space population growth models. Am Nat 123:230–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B et al (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325:578–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to To Dieu-Hang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linh-Son, N., Dieu-Hang, T. Shortcomings of current fish transfer functions and a proposal for a new transfer function. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 22, 933–942 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-012-9278-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-012-9278-2

Keywords

Navigation