Abstract
This study investigates the propagation of default risk along the supply chain. We adopt a modified version of the firm-specific upstreamness measure from Gofman et al. (Rev Financ Stud 33:5856–5905, 2020) to assess each firm's vertical distance to the final consumption products in the supply chain. We find that upstream firms are more exposed to default risk, and the upstream effect is more substantial for firms that belong to less prominent, more leveraged, and less diverse supply chains. We also find that a distressed firm only affects its upstream suppliers but not its downstream customers. Our results are robust across various empirical specifications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We would like to thank the anonymous referee for pointing out the need for further clarification on this matter.
For example, Lang and Stulz (1992) find that the negative announcement return of portfolio on the competitors of bankrupt firms is more significant for highly levered industries. Itzkowitz (2015) argues that the ratio of investment to cash sensitivity is lower for firms with principal buyers, who act as monitors. The effect is especially strong for financially distressed suppliers. Lian (2017) finds that the financial contagion of distress from customer to supplier is stronger for customers who are more likely to default in the future. Kumar et al. (2021) find that distress propagation is related to the network structure by investigating 140,000 firms.
References
Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80:1977–2016
Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Financ 23:589–609
Altman EI, Hotchkiss E (2010) Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt, vol 289. Wiley
Amiram D, Li X, Owens E (2020) Lending along the supply chain, Available at SSRN 3499812.
Aragon GO, Strahan PE (2012) Hedge funds as liquidity providers: evidence from the Lehman bankruptcy. J Financ Econ 103:570–587
Banerjee S, Dasgupta S, Kim Y (2008) Buyer-Supplier relationships and the Stakeholder theory of capital structure. J Financ 63:2507–2552
Begley J, Ming J, Watts S (1996) Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980s: an empirical analysis of Altman’s and Ohlson’s models. Rev Acc Stud 1:267–284
Bernstein S, Colonnelli E, Giroud X, Iverson B (2019) Bankruptcy spillovers. J Financ Econ 133:608–633
Bharath ST, Shumway T (2008) Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model. Rev Financ Stud 21:1339–1369
Boone AL, Ivanov VI (2012) Bankruptcy spillover effects on strategic alliance partners. J Financ Econ 103:551–569
Bray RL, Mendelson H (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: an empirical investigation. Manag Sci 58:860–875
Brunnermeier MK (2009) Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. J Econ Perspect 23:77–100
Campbell JY, Hilscher J, Szilagyi J (2008) In search of distress risk. J Financ 63:2899–2939
Campello M, Gao J (2017) Customer concentration and loan contract terms. J Financ Econ 123:108–136
Chakrabarty B, Zhang G (2012) Credit contagion channels: Market microstructure evidence from Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Financ Manag 41:320–343
Cohen L, Frazzini A (2008) Economic links and predictable returns. J Financ 63:1977–2011
Dhaliwal D, Scott Judd J, Serfling M, Shaikh S (2016) Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. J Acc Econ 61:23–48
Fernando CS, May AD, Megginson WL (2012) The value of investment banking relationships: evidence from the collapse of Lehman Brothers. J Financ 67:235–270
Ferris SP, Jayaraman N, Makhija AK (1997) The response of competitors to announcements of bankruptcy: an empirical examination of contagion and competitive effects. J Corp Finan 3:367–395
Fransoo JC, Wouters MJF (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 5:78–89
Gabaix X (2011) The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 79:733–772
George TJ, Hwang C-Y (2010) A resolution of the distress risk and leverage puzzles in the cross section of stock returns. J Financ Econ 96:56–79
Gofman M, Youchang Wu (2022) Trade credit and profitability in production networks. J Financ Econ 143:593–618
Gofman M, Segal G, Wu Y (2020) Production networks and stock returns: the role of vertical creative destruction. Rev Financ Stud 33:5856–5905
Guan Y, Wong MH, Zhang Y (2015) Analyst following along the supply chain. Rev Acc Stud 20:210–241
Gurtu A, Johny J (2021) Supply chain risk management: literature review. Risks 9:16
Herskovic B, Kelly B, Lustig H, Van Nieuwerburgh S (2020) Firm volatility in granular networks. J Polit Econ 128:4097–4162
Hertzel MG, Smith JK (1993) Industry effects of interfirm lawsuits: evidence from pennzoil v. Teaxaco. J Law Econ Organ 9:425–444
Hertzel MG, Li Z, Officer MS, Rodgers KJ (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J Financ Econ 87:374–387
Hillegeist SA, Keating EK, Cram DP, Lundstedt KG (2004) Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Rev Acc Stud 9:5–34
Houston JF, Lin C, Zhu Z (2016) The financial implications of supply chain changes. Manag Sci 62:2520–2542
Hui KW, Liang C, Eric Yeung P (2019) The effect of major customer concentration on firm profitability: competitive or collaborative? Rev Acc Stud 24:189–229
Irvine PJ, Park SS, Yıldızhan Ç (2015) Customer-base concentration, profitability, and the relationship life cycle. Acc Rev 91:883–906
Itzkowitz J (2013) Customers and cash: how relationships affect suppliers’ cash holdings. J Corp Financ 19:159–180
Itzkowitz J (2015) Buyers as stakeholders: how relationships affect suppliers’ financial constraints. J Corp Financ 31:54–66
Jarrow RA, Yu F (2001) Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. J Financ 56:1765–1799
Jorion P, Zhang G (2009) Credit contagion from counterparty risk. J Financ 64:2053–2087
Kang J-K, Stulz RM (2000) Do banking shocks affect borrowing firm performance? An analysis of the Japanese experience. J Bus 73:1–23
Kim S-J, Shin HS (2012) Sustaining production chains through financial linkages. Am Econ Rev 102:402–406
Kumar A, Chakrabarti AS, Chakraborti A, Nandi T (2021) Distress propagation on production networks: coarse-graining and modularity of linkages. Phys A 568:125714
Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1992) Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 32:45–60
Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Manag Sci 43:546–558
Lian Y (2017) Financial distress and customer-supplier relationships. J Corp Financ 43:397–406
Lucas RE (1977) Understanding business cycles, Paper read at Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy
Merton RC (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Financ 29:449–470
Merton RC (1976) Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J Financ Econ 3:125–144
Metters R (1997) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. J Oper Manag 15:89–100
Mihov A, Naranjo A (2017) Customer-base concentration and the transmission of idiosyncratic volatility along the vertical chain. J Empir Financ 40:73–100
Nguyen MC, Dang VA, Nguyen TT (2023) The transfer of risk taking along the supply chain. Rev Quant Financ Acc 61:1341–1378
Ohlson JA (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Acc Res 18:109–131
Osadchiy N, Schmidt W, Wu J (2021) The bullwhip effect in supply networks. Manag Sci 67:6153–6173
Sáenz MJ, Revilla E (2014) Creating more resilient supply chains. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55:22–24
Sautner Z, Vladimirov V (2018) Indirect costs of financial distress and bankruptcy law: evidence from trade credit and sales. Rev Financ 22:1667–1704
Schiller C (2023) Financial contagion in international supply-chain networks, Available at SSRN 2909132.
Slovin MB, Sushka ME, Polonchek JA (1999) An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banks. J Financ Econ 54:197–225
Spatareanu M, Manole V, Kabiri A, Roland I (2023) Bank default risk propagation along supply chains: evidence from the U.K. Int Rev Econ Financ 84:813–831
Stulz RM (2010) Credit default swaps and the credit crisis. J Econ Perspect 24:73–92
Vassalou M, Xing Y (2004) Default risk in equity returns. J Financ 59:831–868
Yun M-S, Cheng L-Y, Zhao Y (2023) Customer concentration and target price accuracy. Rev Quant Fin Acc 61:995–1028
Funding
National Science and Technology Council, 109-2410-H-305-017-, Ko-Chia Yu, 112-2918-I-305-001-, Ko-Chia Yu, National Science and Technology Council, 111-2410-H-305-080-, Ko-Chia Yu, National Taipei University, 109-NTPU_ORDA-F-001, Ko-Chia Yu, 112-NTPU_ORDA-F-003, Ko-Chia Yu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yun, MS., Yu, KC. Vertical propagation of default risk along the supply chain. Rev Quant Finan Acc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01251-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01251-x