Skip to main content
Log in

Vertical propagation of default risk along the supply chain

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the propagation of default risk along the supply chain. We adopt a modified version of the firm-specific upstreamness measure from Gofman et al. (Rev Financ Stud 33:5856–5905, 2020) to assess each firm's vertical distance to the final consumption products in the supply chain. We find that upstream firms are more exposed to default risk, and the upstream effect is more substantial for firms that belong to less prominent, more leveraged, and less diverse supply chains. We also find that a distressed firm only affects its upstream suppliers but not its downstream customers. Our results are robust across various empirical specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for pointing out the need for further clarification on this matter.

  2. For example, Lang and Stulz (1992) find that the negative announcement return of portfolio on the competitors of bankrupt firms is more significant for highly levered industries. Itzkowitz (2015) argues that the ratio of investment to cash sensitivity is lower for firms with principal buyers, who act as monitors. The effect is especially strong for financially distressed suppliers. Lian (2017) finds that the financial contagion of distress from customer to supplier is stronger for customers who are more likely to default in the future. Kumar et al. (2021) find that distress propagation is related to the network structure by investigating 140,000 firms.

  3. https://www.supplychaindive.com/press-release/20220330-riskmethods-survey-reveals-supply-chain-disruption-is-costing-many-business/, assessed on 2024/01/16.

  4. https://www.aon.com/en/insights/reports/global-risk-management-survey/top-global-risk-6-supply-chain-and-distribution-failure, assessed on 2024/01/16.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80:1977–2016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Financ 23:589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman EI, Hotchkiss E (2010) Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt, vol 289. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiram D, Li X, Owens E (2020) Lending along the supply chain, Available at SSRN 3499812.

  • Aragon GO, Strahan PE (2012) Hedge funds as liquidity providers: evidence from the Lehman bankruptcy. J Financ Econ 103:570–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Dasgupta S, Kim Y (2008) Buyer-Supplier relationships and the Stakeholder theory of capital structure. J Financ 63:2507–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley J, Ming J, Watts S (1996) Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980s: an empirical analysis of Altman’s and Ohlson’s models. Rev Acc Stud 1:267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S, Colonnelli E, Giroud X, Iverson B (2019) Bankruptcy spillovers. J Financ Econ 133:608–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharath ST, Shumway T (2008) Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model. Rev Financ Stud 21:1339–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone AL, Ivanov VI (2012) Bankruptcy spillover effects on strategic alliance partners. J Financ Econ 103:551–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray RL, Mendelson H (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: an empirical investigation. Manag Sci 58:860–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier MK (2009) Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. J Econ Perspect 23:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Hilscher J, Szilagyi J (2008) In search of distress risk. J Financ 63:2899–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campello M, Gao J (2017) Customer concentration and loan contract terms. J Financ Econ 123:108–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty B, Zhang G (2012) Credit contagion channels: Market microstructure evidence from Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Financ Manag 41:320–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L, Frazzini A (2008) Economic links and predictable returns. J Financ 63:1977–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal D, Scott Judd J, Serfling M, Shaikh S (2016) Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. J Acc Econ 61:23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando CS, May AD, Megginson WL (2012) The value of investment banking relationships: evidence from the collapse of Lehman Brothers. J Financ 67:235–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SP, Jayaraman N, Makhija AK (1997) The response of competitors to announcements of bankruptcy: an empirical examination of contagion and competitive effects. J Corp Finan 3:367–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransoo JC, Wouters MJF (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 5:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix X (2011) The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 79:733–772

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • George TJ, Hwang C-Y (2010) A resolution of the distress risk and leverage puzzles in the cross section of stock returns. J Financ Econ 96:56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gofman M, Youchang Wu (2022) Trade credit and profitability in production networks. J Financ Econ 143:593–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gofman M, Segal G, Wu Y (2020) Production networks and stock returns: the role of vertical creative destruction. Rev Financ Stud 33:5856–5905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan Y, Wong MH, Zhang Y (2015) Analyst following along the supply chain. Rev Acc Stud 20:210–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtu A, Johny J (2021) Supply chain risk management: literature review. Risks 9:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovic B, Kelly B, Lustig H, Van Nieuwerburgh S (2020) Firm volatility in granular networks. J Polit Econ 128:4097–4162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzel MG, Smith JK (1993) Industry effects of interfirm lawsuits: evidence from pennzoil v. Teaxaco. J Law Econ Organ 9:425–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzel MG, Li Z, Officer MS, Rodgers KJ (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J Financ Econ 87:374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillegeist SA, Keating EK, Cram DP, Lundstedt KG (2004) Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Rev Acc Stud 9:5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston JF, Lin C, Zhu Z (2016) The financial implications of supply chain changes. Manag Sci 62:2520–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui KW, Liang C, Eric Yeung P (2019) The effect of major customer concentration on firm profitability: competitive or collaborative? Rev Acc Stud 24:189–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine PJ, Park SS, Yıldızhan Ç (2015) Customer-base concentration, profitability, and the relationship life cycle. Acc Rev 91:883–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz J (2013) Customers and cash: how relationships affect suppliers’ cash holdings. J Corp Financ 19:159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz J (2015) Buyers as stakeholders: how relationships affect suppliers’ financial constraints. J Corp Financ 31:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow RA, Yu F (2001) Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. J Financ 56:1765–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2009) Credit contagion from counterparty risk. J Financ 64:2053–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang J-K, Stulz RM (2000) Do banking shocks affect borrowing firm performance? An analysis of the Japanese experience. J Bus 73:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-J, Shin HS (2012) Sustaining production chains through financial linkages. Am Econ Rev 102:402–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Chakrabarti AS, Chakraborti A, Nandi T (2021) Distress propagation on production networks: coarse-graining and modularity of linkages. Phys A 568:125714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1992) Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 32:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Manag Sci 43:546–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian Y (2017) Financial distress and customer-supplier relationships. J Corp Financ 43:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1977) Understanding business cycles, Paper read at Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy

  • Merton RC (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Financ 29:449–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton RC (1976) Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J Financ Econ 3:125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metters R (1997) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. J Oper Manag 15:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihov A, Naranjo A (2017) Customer-base concentration and the transmission of idiosyncratic volatility along the vertical chain. J Empir Financ 40:73–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen MC, Dang VA, Nguyen TT (2023) The transfer of risk taking along the supply chain. Rev Quant Financ Acc 61:1341–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson JA (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Acc Res 18:109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osadchiy N, Schmidt W, Wu J (2021) The bullwhip effect in supply networks. Manag Sci 67:6153–6173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz MJ, Revilla E (2014) Creating more resilient supply chains. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55:22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautner Z, Vladimirov V (2018) Indirect costs of financial distress and bankruptcy law: evidence from trade credit and sales. Rev Financ 22:1667–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller C (2023) Financial contagion in international supply-chain networks, Available at SSRN 2909132.

  • Slovin MB, Sushka ME, Polonchek JA (1999) An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banks. J Financ Econ 54:197–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spatareanu M, Manole V, Kabiri A, Roland I (2023) Bank default risk propagation along supply chains: evidence from the U.K. Int Rev Econ Financ 84:813–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz RM (2010) Credit default swaps and the credit crisis. J Econ Perspect 24:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassalou M, Xing Y (2004) Default risk in equity returns. J Financ 59:831–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun M-S, Cheng L-Y, Zhao Y (2023) Customer concentration and target price accuracy. Rev Quant Fin Acc 61:995–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, 109-2410-H-305-017-, Ko-Chia Yu, 112-2918-I-305-001-, Ko-Chia Yu, National Science and Technology Council, 111-2410-H-305-080-, Ko-Chia Yu, National Taipei University, 109-NTPU_ORDA-F-001, Ko-Chia Yu, 112-NTPU_ORDA-F-003, Ko-Chia Yu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko-Chia Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yun, MS., Yu, KC. Vertical propagation of default risk along the supply chain. Rev Quant Finan Acc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01251-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01251-x

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation