Abstract
Despite their divergent metaphysical assumptions, Reformed and evolutionary epistemologists have converged on the notion of proper basicality. Where Reformed epistemologists appeal to God, who has designed the mind in such a way that it successfully aims at the truth, evolutionary epistemologists appeal to natural selection as a mechanism that favors truth-preserving cognitive capacities. This paper investigates whether Reformed and evolutionary epistemological accounts of theistic belief are compatible. We will argue that their chief incompatibility lies in the noetic effects of sin and what may be termed the noetic effects of evolution, systematic tendencies wherein human cognitive faculties go awry. We propose a reconceptualization of the noetic effects of sin to mitigate this tension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen C., Bekoff M. (1995) Biological function, adaptation, and natural design. Philosophy of Science 62: 609–622
Augustine. (5th century [1972]). The city of God against the pagans (W. M. Green, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Axtell G. (2006) Blind man’s bluff: The basic belief apologetic as anti-skeptical stratagem. Philosophical studies 130: 131–152
Barrett J. L. (2004) Why would anyone believe in God?. AltaMita Press, Lanham, MD
Barrett J. L. (2009) Cognitive science, religion, and theology. In: Schloss J., Murray M. J. (Eds.), The believing primate. Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 76–99
Barrett J. L., Richert R. A., Driesenga A. (2001) God’s beliefs versus mother’s: The development of nonhuman agent concepts. Child Development 72: 50–65
Bergmann M. (2002) Commonsense naturalism. In: Beilby J. (Ed.), Naturalism defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 61–90
Bering J. M. (2011) The God instinct. The psychology of souls, destiny and the meaning of life. Nicholas Brealy, London
Bering J. M., McLeod K., Shackelford T. (2005) Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature 16: 360–381
Bloom P. (2007) Religion is natural. Developmental Science 10: 147–151
Bloom P. (2009) Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. In: Schloss J., Murray M. (Eds.), The believing primate.Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 118–127
Boulter S. J. (2007) The “evolutionary argument” and the metaphilosophy of commonsense. Biology & Philosophy 22: 369–382
Calvin J. (1559 [1960]). Institutes of the Christian religion (F. L. Battles, Trans). Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Clark K. J., Barrett J. L. (2010) Reformed epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Faith and Philosophy 27: 174–189
Clark K. J., Barrett J. L. (2011) Reidian religious epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79: 639–675
Cohen S. (2002) Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 309–329
Cummins R. (2002) Neo-teleology. In: Ariew A., Cummins R., Perlman M. (Eds.), Functions: New essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 157–172
Darwin C. (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S. (2011). Evolutionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica, 64, 517–535.
Dennett D. C. (2006) Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phenomenon. Oxford, Allen Lane
Fales E. (1996) Plantinga’s case against naturalistic epistemology. Philosophy of Science 63: 432–451
Goldman A. I. (1999) A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology. In: Tomberlin J. (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–28
Grant P. (1971) Original sin and the fall of man in Thomas Traherne. English Literary History 38: 40–61
Guthrie S. E. (1993) Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press, New York
Harlow D. C. (2010) After Adam: Reading Genesis in an age of evolutionary science. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62: 179–195
Henrich J., McElreath R., Barr A., Ensminger J., Barrett C., Bolyanatz A., Cardenas J.C., Gurven M., Gwako E., Henrich N., Lesorogol C., Marlowe F., Tracer D., Ziker J. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312: 1767–1770
Hick J. (1966) Evil and the God of love. Macmillan, London
Hodge K. M. (2011) On imagining the afterlife. Journal of Cognition and Culture 11: 367–389
Irenaeus. (2nd century [1884]) Against heresies (A. Roberts, W.H. Rambaut, Trans.). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
Irenaeus. (2nd century [1997]) On the apostolic preaching (J. Behr, Trans.). Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Jacobsen A. (2005) The importance of Genesis 1–3 in the theology of Irenaeus. Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 8: 299–316
Jenson R. W. (1999) Systematic theology: The works of God (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaptchuk T. J. (2002) The placebo effect in alternative medicine: Can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance?. Annals of Internal Medicine 136: 817–825
Kelemen D. (2004) Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science 15: 295–301
Lewis-Williams D. (2002) The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. Thames & Hudson, London
McCall G. S., Shields N. (2008) Examining the evidence from small-scale societies and early prehistory and implications for modern theories of aggression and violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior 13: 1–9
McKay R. T., Dennett D. C. (2009) The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 493–510
Millikan R. (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Mithen S. (1996) The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, religion and science. Houghton Mifflin, Boston New York
Neander K. (1991) Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184
Norenzayan A., Shariff A. F. (2008) The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322: 58–62
Pascalis O., Bachevalier J. (1998) Face recognition in primates: A cross-species study. Behavioural Processes 43: 87–96
Perlman M. (2010) Traits have evolved to function the way they do because of a past advantage. In: Ayala F. J., Arp R. (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 53–71
Petrovic P., Kalso E., Petersson K. M., Ingvar M. (2001) Placebo and opioid analgesia—Imaging a shared neuronal network. Science 295: 1737–1740
Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Plantinga A. (2000) Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press, New York
Quine W. V. O. (1975) The nature of natural knowledge. In: Guttenplan S. (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson College lectures. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 67–81
Reid T. (1764) An inquiry into the human mind, on the principles of common sense. Kincaid and Bell, Edinburg
Reid T. (1785) Essays on the intellectual powers of man. John Bell & Co, Edinburgh
Roes F. L., Raymond M. (2003) Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 126–135
Rossano M. J. (2010) Supernatural selection: How religion evolved. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rowlands M. (1997) Teleological semantics. Mind 106: 279–303
Sanderson S. K., Roberts W. W. (2008) The evolutionary forms of the religious life: A cross-cultural, quantitative analysis. American Anthropologist 110: 454–466
Schneider J. R. (2010) Recent genetic science and Christian theology on human origins: An “aesthetic supralapsarianism”. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62: 196–212
Shariff A. F., Norenzayan A. (2007) God is watching: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science 18: 803–809
Silk, J. B., House, B. R. (2011). Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 10910–10917.
Sosis R., Alcorta C. (2003) Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 264–274
Steadman L. B., Palmer C. T., Tilley C. F. (1996) The universality of ancestor worship. Ethnology 35: 63–76
Stephens C. L. (2001) When is it selectively advantageous to have true beliefs? Sandwiching the better safe than sorry argument. Philosophical Studies 105: 161–189
Stewart-Williams S. (2005) Innate ideas as a naturalistic source of metaphysical knowledge. Biology & Philosophy 20: 791–814
Stich S. (1990) The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatic theory of cognitive evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Sudduth M. (2009) The Reformed objection to natural theology. Ashgate, Farnham
Swinburne R. (1989) Responsability and atonement. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Swinburne R. (2004) The existence of God (6th ed). Clarendon Press, Oxford
Tennant F. R. (1906) The origin and propagation of sin being the Hulsean lectures delivered before the University of Cambridge in 1901-2 (6nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Van Huyssteen W. J. (2006) Alone in the world? Human uniqueness in science and theology. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen
Venema D. R. (2010) Genesis and the genome: Genomics evidence for human-ape common ancestry and ancestral hominid population sizes. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62: 166–178
Wenger A., Fowers B. J. (2008) Positive illusions in parenting: Every child is above average. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 3: 611–634
Wolterstorff N. (1983) Can belief in God be rational if it has no foundations?. In: Plantinga A., Wolterstorff N. (Eds.), Faith and rationality. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp 135–186
Wrangham R., Peterson D. (1996) Demonic males. Apes and the origins of human violence. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Wyman W. E. (1994) Rethinking the Christian doctrine of sin: Friedrich Schleiermacher and Hick’s “Irenaean type”. Journal of Religion 74: 199–217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Cruz, H., De Smedt, J. Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin. Int J Philos Relig 74, 49–66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9368-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9368-z