Abstract
First, some say that core physicalism is not anti-religion. I argue that this seems to be incorrect. Physical completeness is a core element of contemporary physicalism; (the evidence for physical completeness is strong); and physical completeness both logically and not strictly logically rejects many central religious views. Consequently, there is a sense in which core physicalism is, in an important way, anti-religion. Second, physical completeness positively supports one significant religious view; and physical completeness permits one to hold two others. The view that physical completeness supports states that there is no natural grounding of the ordinarily taken boundary of the human body. The two views that physical completeness permits one to hold state that a person can be contrastlessly blissful in an ongoing way, and that a person can experience something like light circulating through the ordinary body in an ongoing way. It is further maintained that physicalism allows religious systems to develop in new forms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel L. (2009a) Science and spirituality. Lulu Publications, USA
Angel L. (2009b) Quintuple extension. Zygon 44: 699–718
Armstrong K. (2000) Islam. Modern Library, NY
Barnstone, W. & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2003). The Gnostic Bible. Boston: Shambhala.
Dupré J. (2004) The miracle of monism. In: Caro M., Macarthur D. (eds) Naturalism in question. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 36–58
Fine L. (1989) The contemplative practice of Yihudim in Lurianic Kabbalah. In: Green A. (eds) Jewish spirituality II. Crossroad, NY, pp 64–98
Mencius. (1970 [4th c. BCE?]). D. C. Lau (Ed.), Mencius. London: Penguin.
Poland J. (1994) Physicalism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Post J. (1987) The faces of existence. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Radhakrishnan, S. (translator). (1969 [BCE]). Chandogya Upanisad, VII: 25: 1. In S. Radhakrishnan (Ed.), The principal Upanisads (pp. 335–512). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Rahula, W. (1974 [1959]). What the Buddha taught. NY: Grove Press.
Shibayama Z. (1974) Zen comments on the Mumonkan. Mentor, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Angel, L. The importance of physicalism in the philosophy of religion. Int J Philos Relig 67, 141–156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9223-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9223-z