Abstract
A newly created dataset including 239 decisions made by the Mexican Federal Competition Commission on horizontal mergers is used to estimate the different factors affecting the Commission’s resolution decisions. The decision-making process has been approximated by two different discrete choice models. Our results indicate that, contrary to the Commission’s objective, the presence of efficiency gains increases the probability of a case being challenged. We also find that factors different from the ones explicitly mentioned by the Commission have a significant effect upon the Commission’s final decision. In particular, the presence of a foreign company among the would-be merger firms significantly increases the likelihood of observing an allowed merger.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergman M., Jakobsson M. and Razo C. (2005). An econometric enalysis of the European Commission’s merger decisions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 717–737
Coate M.B. (2005a). Empirical analysis of merger enforcement under the 1992 merger guidelines. Review of Industrial Organization 27: 279–301
Coate, M. B. (2005b). Economic models in merger analysis: A case study of merger guidelines. Working Paper in Law and Economics 05-04.
Coate M.B., Higgins R.S. and McChesney F.S. (1990). Bureaucracy and politics in FTC merger challenges. Journal of Law and Economics 33: 463–483
Coate M.B. and Kleit A.N. (2004). Art of the deal: The merger settlement process at the Federal Trade Commission. Southern Economic Journal 70: 977–997
Coate M.B. and McChesney F.S. (1992). Empirical evidence on FTC enforcement of the merger guidelines. Economic Inquiry 30: 277–293
Davies S.W., Driffield N.L. and Clarke R. (1999). Monopoly in the UK: What determines whether the MMC finds against the investigated firms? The Journal of Industrial Economics 47: 263–283
Farrell J. and Shapiro C. (1990). Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review 80: 107–126
Fisher F.M. (1987). Horizontal mergers: Triage and treatment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 23–40
García P.A. (1990). Un enfoque para medir la concentración industrial y su aplicación para el caso de México. El Trimestre Económico 2: 317–341
Greene W.H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Katzmann R.A. (1980). Federal Trade Commission. In: Wilson, J.K. (eds) The politics of regulation. Basic Books, New York
Khemani R.S. and Shapiro D.M. (1993). An empirical analysis of Canadian merger policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics 41: 161–177
Kouliavtsev M.S. (2005). Some empirical evidence on the effectiveness of antimerger relief in the United States. Economic Inquiry 43: 370–384
Levy S. (2000). Observaciones sobre la nueva legislación de competencia económica en México. In: Tovar, L.R. (eds) Lecturas en regulación económica y polítca de competencia, pp 167–179. Grupo Editorial Porrúa, México DF
Long, J. S. (1998). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series, Sage Publications.
Maddala G. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McFadden D.L. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328
McFadden, D. L. (1984). Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In Z. Griliches, & M. D., Intriligator (Eds.). Handbook of econometrics (pp. 1396–1446). Elsevier Science Publishers.
Posner R.A. (1979). A statistical study of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 365–426
Röller, L. H., Stennek, J., & Verboven, F. (1999). Efficiency gains from mergers. CEPR, Report for European Commission, DGII.
Weir C. (1992). Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Merger reports and the public interest: A probit analysis. Applied Economics 24: 27–34
Weir C. (1993). Merger policy and competition: Analysis of the monopolies and mergers commission’s decisions. Applied Economics 24: 57–66
White L.J. (1987). Antitrust and merger policy: A review and critique. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 13–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avalos, M., De Hoyos, R.E. An Empirical Analysis of Mexican Merger Policy. Rev Ind Organ 32, 113–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9168-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9168-x