Skip to main content
Log in

An Empirical Analysis of Mexican Merger Policy

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A newly created dataset including 239 decisions made by the Mexican Federal Competition Commission on horizontal mergers is used to estimate the different factors affecting the Commission’s resolution decisions. The decision-making process has been approximated by two different discrete choice models. Our results indicate that, contrary to the Commission’s objective, the presence of efficiency gains increases the probability of a case being challenged. We also find that factors different from the ones explicitly mentioned by the Commission have a significant effect upon the Commission’s final decision. In particular, the presence of a foreign company among the would-be merger firms significantly increases the likelihood of observing an allowed merger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergman M., Jakobsson M. and Razo C. (2005). An econometric enalysis of the European Commission’s merger decisions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 717–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coate M.B. (2005a). Empirical analysis of merger enforcement under the 1992 merger guidelines. Review of Industrial Organization 27: 279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coate, M. B. (2005b). Economic models in merger analysis: A case study of merger guidelines. Working Paper in Law and Economics 05-04.

  • Coate M.B., Higgins R.S. and McChesney F.S. (1990). Bureaucracy and politics in FTC merger challenges. Journal of Law and Economics 33: 463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coate M.B. and Kleit A.N. (2004). Art of the deal: The merger settlement process at the Federal Trade Commission. Southern Economic Journal 70: 977–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coate M.B. and McChesney F.S. (1992). Empirical evidence on FTC enforcement of the merger guidelines. Economic Inquiry 30: 277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies S.W., Driffield N.L. and Clarke R. (1999). Monopoly in the UK: What determines whether the MMC finds against the investigated firms? The Journal of Industrial Economics 47: 263–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J. and Shapiro C. (1990). Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review 80: 107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher F.M. (1987). Horizontal mergers: Triage and treatment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • García P.A. (1990). Un enfoque para medir la concentración industrial y su aplicación para el caso de México. El Trimestre Económico 2: 317–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene W.H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzmann R.A. (1980). Federal Trade Commission. In: Wilson, J.K. (eds) The politics of regulation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khemani R.S. and Shapiro D.M. (1993). An empirical analysis of Canadian merger policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics 41: 161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouliavtsev M.S. (2005). Some empirical evidence on the effectiveness of antimerger relief in the United States. Economic Inquiry 43: 370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy S. (2000). Observaciones sobre la nueva legislación de competencia económica en México. In: Tovar, L.R. (eds) Lecturas en regulación económica y polítca de competencia, pp 167–179. Grupo Editorial Porrúa, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1998). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series, Sage Publications.

  • Maddala G. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D.L. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. L. (1984). Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In Z. Griliches, & M. D., Intriligator (Eds.). Handbook of econometrics (pp. 1396–1446). Elsevier Science Publishers.

  • Posner R.A. (1979). A statistical study of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 365–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röller, L. H., Stennek, J., & Verboven, F. (1999). Efficiency gains from mergers. CEPR, Report for European Commission, DGII.

  • Weir C. (1992). Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Merger reports and the public interest: A probit analysis. Applied Economics 24: 27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir C. (1993). Merger policy and competition: Analysis of the monopolies and mergers commission’s decisions. Applied Economics 24: 57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White L.J. (1987). Antitrust and merger policy: A review and critique. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 13–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Avalos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avalos, M., De Hoyos, R.E. An Empirical Analysis of Mexican Merger Policy. Rev Ind Organ 32, 113–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9168-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9168-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation