Abstract
This paper examines how patent renewal fees may be restructured to discourage low-value patents with the goal of reducing the burden on patent offices without unduly impairing innovation incentives. We depart from Pakes’ (1986, Econometrica, 54, 755–784) real-option model by moving to an approach involving binomial trees, widely used in valuing financial options. The new approach has the advantage of allowing the dynamics of the patent rent to follow a wide range of stochastic processes. The model is estimated using French data from 1970 to 2002. Policy simulations cast some doubt on the relevance of the current schedule of renewal fees. An alternative fee schedule is suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. C. Cox S. A. Ross M. Rubinstein (1979) ArticleTitle‘Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach’ Journal of Financial Economics 7 229–263 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
F. Cornelli M. Schankerman (1999) ArticleTitle‘Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives’ RAND Journal of Economics 30 197–213
Dixit, A. K., (1991) ‘Investment and Hysteresis’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 107–132.
A. K. Dixit R. S. Pindyck (1994) ‘Investment under Uncertainty’ Princeton University Press NJ
Gans, J., S. P. King, and R. Lampe (2004) ‘Patent Renewal Fees and Self-Funding Patent Offices’. Working Paper No 64, Faculty of Law, The University of Melbourne.
M. A. Heller R. S. Eisenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research’ Science 280 698–701 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.280.5364.698
Institut National de la Propriété Intellectuelle (1970–2004) ‘Bulletin Officiel de la Propriété Industrielle’.
Journal Officiel (1968–2002) ‘Arrêtés Relatifs aux Redevances de Procédures Perçues par l’INPI’.
Lanjouw, J. O. (1993) ‘Patent Protection: of What Value and for How Long?’, NBER Working Paper, No 4475.
M. A. Lemley (2001) ArticleTitle‘Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office’ Northwestern University Law Review 95 IssueID4 1495–1532
R. Mariano M. Schuermann J. Weeks (Eds) (2000) ‘Simulation-Based Inference in Econometrics : Methods and Applications’ Cambridge University press Cambridge 462
R. Merges (1999) ArticleTitle‘As Many as Six Impossible Patents before Breakfast : Property Right for Business Concepts and Patent System Reforms’ Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14 577–615
A. S. Pakes (1986) ArticleTitle‘Patents as Options : Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks’ Econometrica 54 755–784
R. S. Pindyck (1991) ArticleTitle‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Investment’ Journal of Economic Literature 29 IssueID3 1110–1148
M. Schankerman A. Pakes (1986) ArticleTitle‘Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries during the Post-1950 Period’ The Economic Journal 96 1052–1076
E. S. Schwartz (2004) ArticleTitle‘Patents and R&D as Real Options’ Economic Notes 33 IssueID1 23–54
S. Scotchmer (1999) ArticleTitle‘On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System’ RAND Journal of Economics 30 IssueID2 181–196
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baudry, M., Dumont, B. Patent Renewals as Options: Improving the Mechanism for Weeding Out Lousy Patents. Rev Ind Organ 28, 41–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-0001-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-0001-0