Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Testing the effects of self-regulation on industrial accidents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study, the first to test the impact of self-regulation on industrial accidents, examines Responsible Care (RC) in the US chemical manufacturing sector. RC requires members to adhere to codes of conduct on production safety and pollution prevention. Using our author-constructed database of 1,867 firms that own 2,963 plants between 1988 and 2001, we instrument for firms’ self-selection into RC using pollution-related regulatory pressure on firms that influences their probability of joining RC, but not plant-level accidents. We find that participation in RC reduces the likelihood of accidents by 2.99 accidents per 100 plants in a given year, or by 69.3%. Participation in RC also reduces the likelihood of process safety accidents and accidents related to violations of RC codes by 5.75 accidents per 100 plants in a given year, or by 85.9%. Alternatively, estimates using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methods indicate that participation in RC reduces the likelihood of accidents by 0.66 accidents per 100 plants in a given year. The reduction in the likelihood of accidents, due to participation in RC, contributes to economically significant averted losses, with savings, even based on the smaller PSM estimates, totaling $180 million per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aakvik A. (2001) Bounding a matching estimator: The case of a norwegian training program. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63(1): 115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen D. T., Shonnard D. R. (2001) Green engineering: Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Altonji J. G., Elder T. E., Taber C. R. (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. The Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 151–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Chemistry Council (ACC) (Renamed Chemical Manufacturers’ Association). (1990). Responsible care: Codes of management practices. Archived at the International Labor Organization Corporate Codes of Conduct.

  • Angrist J. D. (1999) Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 19(1): 2–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenti, K. (2004). Pollution prevention and worker protection. In U.S. general services administration. Sustainable development and society (pp. 41–48). Washington, DC: GSA Office of Governmental Policy.

  • Armenti K., Moure-Eraso R., Slatin C., Geiser K. (2003) Joint occupational and environmental pollution prevention strategies: A model for primary prevention. New Solutions, A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 13(3): 241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker Report. (2007). The report of the BP U.S. refineries independent safety review panel.

  • Baram M. S. (1986) Public health and the law: Chemical industry accidents, liability, and community right to know. American Journal of Public Health 76(5): 568–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkenbus J. N. (1983) Is self-regulation possible?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2(4): 576–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belke J. C., Dietrich D. Y. (2005) The post-Bhopal and post-9/11 transformations in chemical emergency prevention and response policy in the United States. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 18: 375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya J., Goldman D., McCaffrey D. (2006) Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments. Statistics in Medicine 25(3): 389–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacconiere W. G., Patten D. M. (1994) Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18: 357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker K., Sass T. R., Gill B., Zimmer R. (2011) The effects of charter high schools on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics 29(2): 377–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomsel O., Börkey P., Glachant M., Lévêque F. (1996) Is there room for environmental self-regulation in the mining sector?. Resources Policy 22(1–2): 79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börkey, P., Glachant, M., Lévêque, F. (2000). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy in OECD countries: An assessment. Center for Industrial Economics, Paris School of Mines and OECD.

  • Broder I. E., Morrall J. F. (1991) Incentives for firms to provide safety: Regulatory authority and capital market reactions. Journal of Regulatory Economics 3(4): 309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo M., Hujer R., Thomson S. (2008) The employment effects of job creation schemes in germany: A microeconometric evaluation. In: Fomby T., Hill R. C., Millimet D. L., Smith J. A. (Eds.) Advances in econometrics, volume 21: Estimating and evaluating treatment effects in econometrics. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley, pp 383–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Capelle-Blancard G., Laguna M.-A. (2010) How does the stock market respond to chemical disasters?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(2): 192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates, Inc. (1989). Industrial profile and cost assessment of a proposed OSHA. Standard concerning process hazard managements in the chemical and petroleum industries. Prepared for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Boston, MA.

  • Chemical Safety Board (CSB-First Chemical Corp). (2003). Investigation report: Explosion and fire: First chemical corp. Chemical Safety Board: Washington, DC.

  • Chemical Safety Board (CSB-Texas City). (2007). Final investigation report: Refinery explosion and fire. Texas City, TX: BP American Refinery Explosion.

  • Chiburis, R. C., Das, J., & Lokshin, M. (2011). A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5601.

  • Christen, P. (2008). FEBRL: A freely available record linkage system with a graphical user interface. In Proceedings of the second Australasian workshop on health data and knowledge management (Vol. 80, pp. 17–25). Wollongong, NSW.

  • Cohen, M. A., Gottlieb, M., Linn, J., & Richardson, N. (2011). Deepwater drilling: Law, policy, and economics of firm organization and safety. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 10-65.

  • Cosslett S. (1981) Efficient estimation of discrete-choice models. In: Manski C. F., McFadden D. (Eds.) Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 51–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson N. L., Segerson K. (2008) Voluntary agreements with industries: Participation incentives with industry-wide targets. Land Economics 84(1): 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechy N., Bourdeaux T., Ayrault N., Kordek M.-A., Le Coze J.-C. (2004) First lessons of the Toulouse ammonium nitrate disaster, 21st September 2001, AZF plant, France. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111(1–3): 131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepwater Horizon Study Group. (2011). Final report on the investigation of the macondo well blowout. Center for Catastrophic Risk Management, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Deily M. E., Gray W. B. (2007) Agency structure and firm culture: OSHA, EPA, and the steel industry. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23(3): 685–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhy, J. A. (2011). Safety plans could clash: Offshore drillers pressured to form watchdog. Houston Chronicle January 9, 2011.

  • Elliott M. R., Wang Y., Kleindorfer P. R., Lowe R. A. (2004) Environmental justice: Community pressure and frequency and severity of U.S. chemical industry accidents. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 58(1): 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Er J., Kunreuther H. C., Rosenthal I. (1998) Utilizing third-party inspections for preventing major chemical accidents. Risk Analysis 18(2): 145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans W. N., Schwab R. M. (1995) Finishing high school and starting college: Do catholic schools make a difference?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(4): 947–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellegi I. P., Sunter A. B. (1969) A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64(328): 1183–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamper-Rabindran S. (2006) Did the EPA’s voluntary industrial toxics program reduce plants’ emissions? A gis analysis of distributional impacts and a by-media analysis of substitution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1): 391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamper-Rabindran, S., & Finger, S. (2012). Does self-regulation reduce pollution? Responsible care program in the chemical industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics, forthcoming.

  • Garber S., Hammitt J. K. (1998) Risk premiums for environmental liability: Does superfund increase the cost of capital?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(3): 267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glachant M. (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(1): 32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray W. B., Jones C. A. (1991) Are OSHA health inspections effective? A longitudinal study in the manufacturing sector. Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3): 504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray W. B., Mendeloff J. M. (2005) The declining effects of OSHA inspections on manufacturing injuries: 1979 to 1998. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 58(4): 571–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray W. B., Scholz J. T. (1993) Does regulatory enforcement work? A panel analysis of OSHA enforcement. Law and Society Review 27(1): 177–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W. (2004) The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econometrics Journal 7: 98–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J. T. (1995) Testing for environmental racism: Prejudice, profits, political power?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14(1): 107–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J. J. (1978) Dummy endogenous variables in simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46(6): 931–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Todd P. E. (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 64(221): 605–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A. (2005) A signalling motive for self-regulation in the shadow of coercion. Journal of Economics and Business 57(3): 238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann D. A., Jacobs R., Landy F. L. (1995) High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety. Journal of Safety Research 26(3): 131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins A. (2000) Lessons from Longford: The Esso gas plant explosion. CCH Australia Limited, North Ryde

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M., Damon L. (1999) EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 698–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein L. R. (1953) A textbook of econometrics. Row, Peterson & Co, Evanston, IL, p 258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer P. R., Belke J. C., Elliott M. R., Lee K., Lowe R. A., Feldman H. I. (2003) Accident epidemiology and the U.S. chemical industry: Accident history and worst-case data from RMP info. Risk Analysis 23(5): 865–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer P. R., Elliott M. R., Wang Y., Lowe R. (2004) drivers of accident preparedness and safety: Evidence from the RMP rule. Journal of Hazardous Material 115(1–3): 9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C. (Eds.) (1987) Insuring and managing hazardous risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and beyond. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Konar S., Cohen M. A. (2001) Does the market value environmental performance?. Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2): 281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause R. T. (2004) Influencing the behavior of senior leadership: What makes a great safety leader?. Professional Safety 49(6): 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A. (2004) Review of new tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures. Journal of Economic Literature 42(1): 171–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon T. P., Maxwell J. W. (2004) Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala G. S. (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell J. W., Lyon T., Hackett S. (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics 63(43): 583–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendeloff J. M., Gray W. B. (2005) Inside the black box: How do OSHA inspections lead to reductions in workplace injuries?. Law and Policy 27(2): 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendeloff J. M., Kagey B. T. (1990) Using OSHA accident investigations to study patterns in work fatalities. Journal of Occupational Medicine 32(11): 1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern R., Pizer W. A. (2007) Reality check: The nature and performance of voluntary environmental programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. RFF Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfardini C., Radice R. (2008) Testing exogeneity in the bivariate probit model: A Monte Carlo study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70(2): 271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering National Research Council (2010) Interim report on causes of the deepwater horizon oil rig blowout and ways to prevent such events. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (NCBP). (2011). deep water: The gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore drilling. Part I: Report to the President. Part II Recommendations.

  • Nichols, A. (2011). Causal inference for binary regression. In Stata conference Chicago, (version June 14, 2011).

  • Pidgeon N., O’Leary M. (2000) Man-made disasters: Why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science 34(1–3): 15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash A. (2000) Responsible care: An assessment. Business & Society 39(2): 183–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J. (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees J. V. (1997) The development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy 17(4): 477–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandy R., Elliott R. F. (1996) Unions and risk: Their impact on the level of compensation for fatal risk. Economica 63(250): 291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J. T., Gray W. B. (1990) OSHA enforcement and workplace injuries: A behavioral approach to risk assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3(3): 283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivin, D. (2002). Impact of a pollution prevention program on occupational exposures. In American Public health association 130th annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S. (1982) Why study risk perception?. Risk Analysis 2(2): 83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. A., Todd P. E. (2005) Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?. Journal of Econometrics 125(1–2): 305–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellman F. R. (1997) A guide to compliance for process safety management/risk management planning. Technomic Publishing Co, Lancaster, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai E. (2000) OSHA compliance management: A guide for long-term health care facilities. CRC Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Asten M., Martinson C. (2005) MON MACT impact. Products Finishing 70(3): 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidovic M., Khanna N. (2007) Can voluntary pollution control programs fulfill their promises? Further evidence from EPA’s 33/50 program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil D. (1996) If OSHA is so bad, why is compliance so good?. Rand Journal of Economics 27(3): 618–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde J. (2000) Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors. Economics Letters 69: 309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J. (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosie T. F. (2003) Peer reviewed: Responsible care at 15 years. Environmental Science & Technology 37(21): 400A–406A

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, 1705 College Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Stephen R. Finger

  2. Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, 3205 Posvar Hall, 230 S. Bouquet St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, USA

    Shanti Gamper-Rabindran

Authors
  1. Stephen R. Finger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shanti Gamper-Rabindran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanti Gamper-Rabindran.

Additional information

Authors are listed alphabetically.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.

ESM 1 (DOC 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finger, S.R., Gamper-Rabindran, S. Testing the effects of self-regulation on industrial accidents. J Regul Econ 43, 115–146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9201-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9201-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation