Skip to main content
Log in

Dehydration of castor oil over H6P2W18O62@MCM-41

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The H6P2W18O62@MCM-41 catalyst (C-1) modified by dodecyltrimethoxysilane (DTMS) showed excellent catalytic performance during the dehydration of castor oil to produce dehydrated castor oil (DCO). The castor oil conversion and the DCO selectivity on H6P2W18O62-DTMS@Zr-MCM-41 (C-2) are higher than those of C-1. The dispersity of H6P2W18O62 is remarkably improved by an appropriate amount of DTMS modification on the C-2 because of the steric effect between the DTMS and H6P2W18O62. Therefore, the total acidic amount of C-2 is more than that of C-1, but the acidic intensity is weaker than that of C-1. The more total amount of acidity is good for improving the castor oil conversion, and the weaker acid strength leads to less carbon deposition. The amount of Brønsted acid sites is higher than that of C-1. However, the amount of Lewis acid sites is less than that of C-1, so the ration of B/(B + L) is higher than that of C-1, which is good for improving the DCO selectivity. The C-2 catalyst has proper hydrophobicity by grafting the silane group of DTMS on the surface of MCM-41, which can suppress the leaching of H6P2W18O62, because the water produced in reaction is not easily adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst. Proper lipophilicity is conducive to the absorption of castor oil to the surface of the catalyst, which can accelerate the reaction. The stability of C-2 is obviously higher than that of C-1, because the coke deposited and W elemental leaching on C-1 are more serious than those of C-2. Under the optimized reaction conditions: 220 °C, 2.8 wt% amount of C-2, H6P2W18O62 loading of 12 wt%, DTMS loading of 3.5 wt%, the iodine and hydroxyl value of product are 148.6 and 8.9, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogunniyi DS (2006) Bioresource Technol 97(9):1086–1091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naughton FC (1974) J Am Oil Chem Soc 51:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meller E, Green U, Aizenshtat Z, Sasson Y (2014) Fuel 133:89–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Azcan N, Demirel E, Yılmaz O, Erciyes AT (2011) Ind Eng Chem Res 50:398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Achaya KT (1971) J Am Oil Chem Soc 48:758–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guner FS (1997) J Am Oil Chem Soc 74:409–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolley DS (1959) J Am Oil Chem Soc 36:518–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan CX, Ding JF, Ma TL, Shao R, Xu W, He J, Wang PF (2017) Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 643:772–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen XY, Jia M, Liu GZ, Zhang XW, Wang L, Mi ZT (2010) Appl Surf Sci 256:5856–5861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zou JJ, Xu Y, Zhang XW, Wang L (2012) Appl Catal A 421:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma TL, Yun Z, Xu W, Chen LG, Li L, Ding JF, Shao R (2016) Chem Eng J 294:343–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma TL, Ding JF, Shao R, Xu W, Yun Z (2017) Chem Eng J 316:797–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO 3961 (1996) Standardization administration of the Peoples Republic of China

  14. Hartman L, Lago RC, Azeredo LC, Azeredo MA (1987) Analyst 112:145–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karthikeyan G, Pandurangan A (2009) J Mol Catal A 311:36–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matkovic SR, Valle GM, Gambaro LA, Briand LE (2008) Catal Today 133:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo SS, Fan GZ, Luo M, Li JF, Song GS (2016) J. CO2 Util 14:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasmina T, Müllera K (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3362–3374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu Y, He YY, Wang XW, Wei CH (2014) Appl Surf Sci 311:825–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS (1992) Nature 359:710–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114(27):10834–10843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berteau P, Delmon B (1989) Catal Today 5:121–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khder AERS, Hassan HMA, El-Shall MS (2012) Appl. Catal. A 411:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21303154), National high Technology Research and Development Program (2015AA021003) and the joint research fund between Collaborative Innovation Center for Ecological Building Materials and Environmental Protection Equipments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfei Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, J., Ma, T., Yan, C. et al. Dehydration of castor oil over H6P2W18O62@MCM-41. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 125, 1007–1021 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1450-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1450-9

Keywords

Navigation