Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of the water–ethanol molar ratio in the ethanol steam reforming reaction over a Co/CeO2/MgAl2O4 catalyst

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Co/MgAl2O4 catalyst with Ce addition was prepared and characterized by different techniques (BET, XRD, SEM-EDX, TPR and TG-TPO). Its catalytic performance was tested in the ethanol steam reforming reaction at 650 °C and a \({\text{W/F}}_{{{\text{C}}_{ 2} {\text{H}}_{ 5} {\text{OH}}}}\) = 50 g min mol−1 using different H2O:C2H5OH molar ratios (MR) in the feed. The presence of Ce on the catalyst markedly increased selectivity of hydrogen (from 3.2 to 5.2 molH2/molC2H5OH for MR = 4.8) and carbon resistance. The increase of the H2O:C2H5OH MR led to a significant decrease in the CO/CO2 ratio (from 0.84 for RM = 4.8 to 0.5 for RM = 8) and in the carbon amount after 7 h on stream (from 22.9 % for RM = 4.8 to 6.8 % for RM = 8). MR higher than 6 did not significantly improve the catalytic performance. Taking into account previous studies about the thermal balance of this reaction, the optimum MR in the ethanol steam reforming seems to be around 6. The ethanol conversion was nearly constant after 7 h in spite of the carbon amount detected by TG-TPO and SEM-EDX. It could be inferred that an important Co fraction was exposed on the filament tips and/or a fraction of carbonaceous species was deposited on the support surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Midilli A, Ay M, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2005) On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies: I: current status and needs. Renew Sust Energy Rev 9:255–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K (2003) The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:267–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balat M, Balat M (2009) Political, economic and environmental impacts of biomass-based hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:3589–3603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH (2007) A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:3238–3247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liguras DK, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE (2003) Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by steam reforming of ethanol over supported noble metal catalysts. Appl Catal B 43:345–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Breen JP, Burch R, Coleman HM (2002) Metal-catalysed steam reforming of ethanol in the production of hydrogen for fuel cell applications. Appl Catal B 39:65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Busca G, Costantino U, Montanari T, Ramis G, Resini C, Sisani M (2010) Nickel versus cobalt catalysts for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming: Ni–Co–Zn–Al catalysts from hydrotalcite-like precursors. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:5356–5366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Batista M, Santos R, Assaf E, Assaf J, Ticianelli E (2003) Characterization of the activity and stability of supported cobalt catalysts for the steam reforming of ethanol. J Power Sources 124:99–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Llorca J, Homs N, Sales J, de la Piscina P (2002) Efficient production of hydrogen over supported cobalt catalysts from ethanol steam reforming. J Catal 209:306–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soykal I, Bayram B, Sohn H, Gawade P, Miller JT, Ozkan U (2012) Ethanol steam reforming over Co/CeO2 catalysts: investigation of the effect of ceria morphology. Appl Catal A 449:47–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barroso MN, Gomez M, Arrua L, Abello MC (2010) CoZnAl catalysts for ethanol steam reforming reaction. Chem Eng J 158:225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Song H, Ozkan U (2010) Changing the oxygen mobility in Co/Ceria catalysts by Ca incorporation: implications for ethanol steam reforming. J Phys Chem A 114:3796–3801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferencz Zs, Erdőhelyi A, Baán K, Oszkó A, Óvári L, Kónya Z, Papp C, Steinrück HP, Kiss J (2014) Effects of support and Rh additive on Co-based catalysts in the ethanol steam reforming reaction. ACS Catal 4:1205–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Avila-Neto CN, Zanchet D, Hori CE, Ribeiro RU, Bueno JMC (2013) Interplay between particle size, composition, and structure of MgAl2O4-supported Co–Cu catalysts and their influence on carbon accumulation during steam reforming of ethanol. J Catal 307:222–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barroso MN, Gomez MF, Arrua LA, Abello MC (2014) Co catalysts modified by rare earths (La, Ce or Pr) for hydrogen production from ethanol. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:8712–8719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattos LV, Jacobs G, Davis BH, Noronha FB (2012) Production of hydrogen from ethanol: review of reaction mechanism and catalyst deactivation. Chem Rev 112:4094–4123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benito M, Padilla R, Rodriguez L, Sanz JL, Daza L (2007) Zirconia supported catalysts for bioethanol steam reforming: effect of active phase and zirconia structure. J Power Sources 169:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ioannides T (2001) Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol processors for fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 92:17–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Francesconi JA, Mussati MC, Mato RO, Aguirre PA (2007) Analysis of the energy efficiency of an integrated ethanol processor for PEM fuel cell systems. J Power Sources 167:151–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Avila CN, Hori CE, de Assis AJ (2011) Thermodynamic assessment of hydrogen production and cobalt oxidation susceptibility under ethanol reforming. Energy 36:4385–4395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin SS-Y, Kim DH, Ha SY (2009) Metallic phases of cobalt-based catalysts in ethanol steam reforming: the effect of cerium oxide. Appl Catal A 355:69–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Varga E, Ferencz Z, Oszkó A, Erdőhelyi A, Kiss J (2015) Oxidation states of active catalytic centers in ethanol steam reforming reaction on ceria based Rh promoted Co catalysts: an XPS study. J Mol Catal 397:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mas V, Baronetti G, Amadeo N, Laborde MA (2008) Ethanol steam reforming using Ni(II)-Al(III) layered double hydroxide as catalyst precursor: kinetic study. Chem Eng J 138:602–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo J, Lou H, Zhao H, Chai D, Zheng X (2004) Dry reforming of methane over nickel catalysts supported on magnesium aluminate spinels. Appl Catal A 273:75–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nandini A, Pant K, Dhingra S (2005) K-, CeO2-, and Mn-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for stable CO2 reforming of methane. Appl Catal A 290:166–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sánchez-Sánchez M, Navarro RM, Fierro JLG (2007) Ethanol steam reforming over Ni/MxOy–Al2O3 (M = Ce, La, Zr and Mg) catalysts: influence of support on the hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:1462–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ros T, Van Dillen A, Geus J, Koningsberger D (2002) Surface oxidation of carbon nanofibres. Chem Eur J 8:1151–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin SS-Y, Kim DH, Engelhard MH, Ha SY (2010) Water-induced formation of cobalt oxides over supported cobalt/ceria–zirconia catalysts under ethanol-steam conditions. J Catal 273:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bayram B, Soykal I, Deak D, Miller J, Ozkan U (2011) Ethanol steam reforming over Co-based catalysts: investigation of cobalt coordination environment under reaction conditions. J Catal 284:77–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Passos A, Martins L, Pulcinelli S, Santilli C, Briois V (2014) Effect of the balance between Co(II) and Co(0) oxidation states on the catalytic activity of cobalt catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming. Catal Today 229:88–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial supports are acknowledged to CONICET, ANPCyT and Universidad Nacional de San Luis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Instituto de Investigaciones en Tecnología Química (INTEQUI-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Chacabuco y Pedernera, 5700, San Luis, Argentina

    Mariana N. Barroso, Manuel F. Gomez, Luis A. Arrúa & Maria C. Abello

Authors
  1. Mariana N. Barroso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuel F. Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis A. Arrúa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria C. Abello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariana N. Barroso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barroso, M.N., Gomez, M.F., Arrúa, L.A. et al. Effect of the water–ethanol molar ratio in the ethanol steam reforming reaction over a Co/CeO2/MgAl2O4 catalyst. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 115, 535–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-015-0852-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-015-0852-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation