Skip to main content
Log in

Schumpeter the incomplete rhetorician

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schumpeter’s Capitalism Socialism, Democracy was typical of 1942 in being pessimistic about all three terms of its title. Socialism would come, he thought, but without liberalism. His historical evidence was necessarily imperfect in light of later scholarship. But so too is his economics, good in parts, but falling in with the pre-analytic vision of the “imperfections” of something called “capitalism,” neither of which has held up well. The book later became popular because it had his characteristic breadth of scholarship, especially historical, but also his ironic stance on almost all issues. What’s finally missing in Schumpeter’s grim prognoses, largely falsified by events, is an acknowledgment of the power of language. Ideas, words, rhetoric, ideology, language games—indeed the world is governed, said another economist, by little else. Denying it is the paradox of the conflicted materialist writer: while denying rhetoric, he enacts it, for what purpose is unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, D. (1978). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1992). Athenian economy and society: A banking perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (2013). Average is over: Powering America beyond the age of the great stagnation. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A.M. Jr. (2018). Personal correspondence with McCloskey

  • Diamond Jr., A. M. (2019). Openness to creative destruction: Sustaining innovative dynamism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2018). The square and the tower: Networks, hierarchies and the struggle for global power from the freemasons to Facebook. New York: Penguin/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1967) (2007). The New Industrial State. With a new introduction by Sean Wilentz and a new foreword by James K. Galbraith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1957) (1962). “Reflections on the Concept of ‘Prerequisites’ of Modern Industrialization.” L’industria 2. Reprinted as pp. 31–51 in Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Gilder, G. (2009). The Israel test. Minneapolis: Richard Vigilante Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2002). Efflorescences and economic growth in world history: Rethinking the ‘rise of the west’ and the industrial revolution. Journal of World History, 13, 323–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth: The U.S. standard of living since the civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1977) (1992). “Interview by Thomas W. Hazlett.” Reason July 1992.

  • Higgs, R. H. (1997). Regime uncertainty: Why the great depression lasted so long and why prosperity resumed after the war. Independent Review, 1(Spring), 561–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. H. (2008). The complex course of ideological change. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67, 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1976). “Equilibrium vs. Market Processes.” In Edwin Dolan, ed., The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward. In Liberty Fund, Library of Liberty.

  • Klamer, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (1995). One Quarter of GDP Is Persuasion. American Economic Review, 85(2, May), 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1998). “Ricardo’s Difficult Idea.” Unpublished teaching material at http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm

  • Langlois, R.N. (2002). "Schumpeter and the Obsolescence of the Entrepreneur." Economics Working Papers. 200219. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/econ_wpapers/200219

  • Levy, D.M. & Peart, S.J. (2009). “ Soviet Growth & American Textbooks. Working paper December 3. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1517983 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1517983

  • Lodge, D. (1988) (1990). Nice work. London: Penguin.

  • Machlup, F. (1943). Capitalism and its future appraised by two Liberal economists. American Economic Review, 33(Jun.), 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A critique of political economy. Vol. 1. F. Engels, ed. Trans. 3rd German ed. by S. Moore and E. Aveling. New York: Modern Library, n.d.

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (1990). If You’re so smart: The narrative of economic expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2016). Bourgeois equality: How ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2017). The Myth of Technological Unemployment" Reason August, 2017.

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2018). “The two movements in economic thought, 1700-2000: Empty economic boxes revisited.” History of Economic Ideas 2018.

  • McCraw, T. K. (2010). Prophet of innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and creative destruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. D. (1999). Capitalism, democracy, and Ralph’s pretty good grocery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozment, S. (2004). A mighty fortress: A new history of the German people. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. (1981). Peaceful conquest: The industrialization of Europe, 1760–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1943). Review of Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Economic Journal, 53(Dec.), 381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1970). “Joseph Schumpeter.” Newsweek, April 13, p. 75.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. English trans. From the 1926 German edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1926 (1934). First German revision of Schumpeter 1911.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. Two vols. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd. ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1950. Richard Swedberg, ed., Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003, from which all quotations are taken. At http://cnqzu.com/library/Economics/marxian%20economics/Schumpeter,%20Joeseph-Capitalism,%20Socialism%20and%20Democracy.pdf

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Science and ideology. American Economic Review, 39(2), 346–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). The march into socialism. American Economic Review, 40(2), 446–456 Reprinted in subsequent editions of CSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter ed. London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Smith, F. (2015). “A new history of American business.” Forbes Sept. 8.

  • Sombart, W. (1913). Krieg und Kapitalismus. München: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, R., & Toniolo, G. (Eds.). (1992). Patterns of European industrialization: The nineteenth century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, L. D. (2017). Thoreau: A life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wex, M. (2005). Born to kvetch: Yiddish language and culture in all its moods. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves Humanity's Most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Arthur M. Diamond, Jr. of the University of Nebraska Omaha for his detailed and illuminating comments on a draft, and not Jeffrey Friedman.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deirdre Nansen McCloskey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCloskey, D.N. Schumpeter the incomplete rhetorician. Rev Austrian Econ 35, 423–443 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00530-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00530-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation