Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Boettke, The Austrian School and the Reclamation of Reality in Modern Economics

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a series of recent papers, the prominent Austrian economist Peter Boettke has criticised orthodox economics for its lack of realism. This paper situates Boettke’s critique in the context provided by recent developments in the methodology of economics, most notably critical realism. While there is a good deal of common ground between Boettke’s approach and critical realism, the latter also helps to reveal some of the limitations of the variant of Austrian economics to which Boettke subscribes. Suggestions are made as to how critical realists and Austrians such as Boettke might move forward together in developing a more realistic, relevant and fruitful approach to economic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, M. S. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1996) Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1998) “Social Theory and Analysis of Society.” In: May, T. and Williams, M. (Eds.) Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2000) “For Structure: Its Reality, properties and Powers. A Reply to Anthony King.” The Sociological Review, 48: 464–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F. H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Beaulier, S. and Boettke, P. J. (2000) “Of Norms, Rules and Markets: A Comment on Samuels.” Mimeo, George Mason University.

  • Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 2nd edition. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1989) “Evolution and Economics: Austrians as Institutionalists.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6: 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1990a) “Individuals and Institutions.” Critical Review, 4: 10–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1990b) “Interpretative Reasoning and the Study of Social Life.” In: Prychitko (Ed., 1995).

  • Boettke, P. J. (1994) “Alternative Paths Forward for Austrian Economics.” In: Boettke (Ed., 1994).

  • Boettke, P. J. (Ed., 1994) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1996) “What is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics (and What is Still Wrong with Austrian Economics)?” In: Foldvary, F.E. (Ed.) Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1997) “Where did Economics Go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight From Reality.” Critical Review, 11: 11–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1998) “Formalism and Contemporary Economics: A Reply to Hausman, Heilbroner and Mayer.” Critical Review, 12: 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1999) “Introduction: Which Enlightenment, Whose Liberalism? Hayek’s Research Programme for Understanding the Liberal Society.” In: Boettke, P. (Ed.) The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek Vol. I: Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., Horwitz, S. and Prychitko, D. (1994) “Beyond Equilibrium Economics: Reflections on the Uniqueness of the Austrian Tradition.” In: Boettke, P. and Prychitko, D. L. (Eds.) The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. and Prychitko, D. L. (1998) “Introduction: Varieties of Market Process Theory.” In: Boettke, P. J. and Prychitko, D. L. (Eds.) Market Process Theories, Vol. I: Classical and Neoclassical. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. and Storr, V. H. (2000) “Post Classical Political Economy: Polity, Society and Economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek.” Mimeo, George Mason University.

  • Boettke, P. J. and Subrick, J. R. (2001) “From the Philosophy of the Mind to the Philosophy of the Market.” Paper presented at the 2001 ASSA Meetings in New Orleans.

  • Buchanan, J. M. ([1969] 1979) “Is Economics the Science of Choice?” In: Buchanan, J. M. (Ed., 1979), What Should Economists Do?Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchvarov, P. (1995) “Metaphysics.” In: Audi, R. (Ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2001) “Hodgson on Hayek: A Critique.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25: 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. (1994) “Causation and Genetic Causation in Economic Theory.” In: Boettke, P. J. (Ed., 1994).

  • Cowan, R. and Rizzo, M. J. (1996) “The Genetic-Causal Tradition and Modern Economic Theory.” Kyklos, 49: 273–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, R. M. (1986) “Towards a Hermeneutical Economics: Expectations, Prices, and the Role of Interpretation in a Theory of the Market Process.” In: Kirzner, I. M. (Ed.) Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honour of Ludwig M. Lachmann on his Eightieth Birthday. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, R. M. (1987) “Cooperation in Anonymity.” Critical Review, 1: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, R. M. (1990) “What is a Price? Explanation and Understanding.” In: Lavoie, D. (Ed.) Economics and Hermeneutics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, S. (1995) Hayek’s Political Economy: The Socio-Economics of Order. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, S. (1996) “Order without Equilibrium: A Critical Realist Interpretation of Hayek’s Notion of Spontaneous Order.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20: 729–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstater, M. (1997) “Adolph Lowe and the Austrians.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 4: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstater, M. (2001) “Phenomenological and Interpretive-Structural Approaches to Economics and Sociology: Schutzian Themes in Adolph Lowe’s Political Economics.” The Review of Austrian Economics, 14: 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J. (1987) “Arrow-Debreu Model of General Equilibrium.” In: Eatwell, J. Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (Eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. I. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. (1984) Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N., and Lawrence, T. (1998) “Distinguishing Trust and Power in Interorganizational Relations: Forms and Façades of Trust.” In: Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (Eds.) Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, H. R. (1988) The Philosophies of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. (1998) “The Faults of Formalism and the Magic of Markets.” Critical Review, 12: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. ([1937] 1948) “Economics and Knowledge.” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed., 1948).

  • Hayek, F. A. ([1945] 1948a) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed., 1948).

  • Hayek, F. A. ([1945] 1948b) “Individualism: True and False.” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed., 1948).

  • Hayek, F. A. (1948) “The Meaning of Competition.” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed., 1948).

  • Hayek, F. A. (1948) Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. I: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978) “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In Hayek, F. A. (Ed.), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. (1998) “The Self-Deception of Economics.” Critical Review, 12: 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1992) The Meaning of the Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (2000) The Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1971) he Legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley: Glendessary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1977) Capital, Expectations and the Market Process. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1987) “The Accounting of Interpretations and the Interpretation of Accounts: The Communicative Function of ‘The Language of Business’.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12: 579–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1990) “Understanding Differently: Hermeneutics and the Spontaneous Order of Communicative Processes.” Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, 22: 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1991) “The Discovery and Interpretation of Profit Opportunities: Culture and the Kirznerian Entrepreneur.” In: Berger, B. (Ed.), The Culture of Entrepreneurship. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1994) “The Interpretive Turn.” In: Boettke, P. J. (Ed., 1994).

  • Lavoie, D. (1995) “The ‘Objectivity’ of Scholarship and the Ideal of the University.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 2B: 371–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1998) “Clarifying and Developing the Economics and Reality Project: Closed and Open Systems, Deductivism, Prediction, and Teaching.” Review of Social Economy, 56: 356–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1999a). “Critical Issues in Economics as Realist Social Theory.” In: Fleetwood, S. (Ed., 1999), Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1999b) “What has Realism Got to do with It?” Economics and Philosophy, 15: 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (2001a) ‘Two Responses to the Failings of Modern Economics: The Instrumentalist and the Realist.” Review of Population and Social Policy, 10: 1–27. Tokyo: National Institute for Population and Social Security Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (2001a) “Mathematical Formalism in Economics: What Really is the Problem?” In Arestis, P., Desai, M. and Dow, S. (Eds.) Methodology, Microeconomics and Keynes: Essays in Honour of Vicky Chick. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1997) Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. A. (2000) “Realism, Causality and the Problem of Social Structure.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30: 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. A. (2003) “The Social Embeddedness of Organisational Activity: Beyond Granovetter.” Paper Presented at the European Group for Organisational Studies Annual Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School.

  • Lewis, P. A. and Runde, J. H. (2001) “Intersubjectivity in Economics: A Critical Realist Perspective.” In: Fullbrook, E. (Ed.), Intersubjectivity in Economics: Agents and Structures. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. A. and Runde, J. H. (2003) “Lachmann on the Possibility of Socio-Economic Order: A View from Cambridge.’ Mimeo, Cambridge University.

  • Madison, G. B. (1990) “How Individualistic is Methodological Individualism?” Critical Review, 4: 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G.B. (1994) “Phenomenology and Economics.” In Boettke, P. J. (Ed., 1994).

  • Mayer, H. ([1932] 1994) “The Cognitive Value of Functional Theories of Price.” In: Kirzner, I. M. (Ed.), Classics in Austrian Economics: A Sampling in the History of a Tradition. Vol. II: The Interwar Period. London: William Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. (1998) “Boettke’s Austrian Critique of Mainstream Economics: An Empiricist’s Response.” Critical Review, 12: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (1994) Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (1994) “One Quarter of GDP is Persuasion.” American Economic Review, 84: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, E. J. and Zannoni, D. C. (2000–2001) “Post Keynesian Economics and Nihilism.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23: 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. ([1883] 1985) Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R. and Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von (1949) Human Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G.P. and Rizzo, M. J. (1996) The Economics of Time and Ignorance, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. V. (1998) “Four Concepts of Social Structure.” In: Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R. Collier, A. Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (Eds., 1998) Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko, D. L. ([1989–1990] 1995) “Methodological Individualism and the Austrian School.” In: Prychitko, D. L. (Ed., 1995).

  • Prychitko, D. L. (Ed., 1995) Individuals, Institutions, Interpretations: Hermeneutics Applied to Economics. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M. J. (1996) “Introduction: Time and Ignorance After Ten Years.” In: O’Driscoll and Rizzo (Eds., 1996).

  • Rizzo, M. J. (2000) “Real Time and Relative Indeterminacy in Economic Theory.” In: Baert, P. J. N. (Ed.) Time in Contemporary Intellectual Thought. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runde, J. H. (1996) “Abstraction, Idealisation and Economic Theory.” In: Arestis, P., Palma, G. and Sawyer, M. (Eds.) Markets, Unemployment and Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, Vol. II. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runde, J. H. (1998) “Assessing Causal Economic Explanations.” Oxford Economic Papers, 50: 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runde, J. H. (2001) “Bringing Social Structure Back into Economics: On Critical Realism and Hayek’s ScientismEssay.” Review of Austrian Economics, 14: 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runde, J. H. (2002) “Information, Knowledge and Agency: The Information-Theoretic Approach and the Austrians.” Review of Social Economy, 60: 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1989a) “Determinate Solutions and Valuational Processes: Overcoming the Foreclosure of Process. “Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 11: 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1989b) “Austrian and Institutional Economics: Some Common Elements.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1999) “Hayek from the Perspective of an Institutionalist Historian of Economic Thought: An Interpretive Essay.” Journal Des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 9: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (2000) “An Essay on the Unmagic of Norms and Rules and of Markets.” Journal Des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 10: 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (2001) “The Political-Economic Logic of World Governance.” Review of Social Economy, 54: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J., Medema, S. G., and Schmid, A. A. (1997) The Economy as a Process of Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1995). Radical Political Economy: A Critique. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciabarra, C. M. (1995) Marx, Hayek and Utopia. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1958) Time in Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1966) The Nature of Economic Thought: Selected Papers 1955–1964. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1969) Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. ([1972] 1992) Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1993) The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, K. I. (1994) Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of a Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, K. I. (1999) “Hayek’s Implicit Economics: Rules and the Problem of Order.” Review of Austrian Economics, 128–144.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Politics, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, and Selwyn College, Cambridge University, UK

    Paul Lewis

Authors
  1. Paul Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, P. Boettke, The Austrian School and the Reclamation of Reality in Modern Economics. Rev Austrian Econ 18, 83–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-005-5594-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-005-5594-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation